aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/sys/dmu.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthew Ahrens <[email protected]>2016-07-20 15:42:13 -0700
committerBrian Behlendorf <[email protected]>2016-08-19 12:48:03 -0700
commit2bce8049c3d782f4feb72493564754c0595606bf (patch)
treecbeb72318d3d772c4c689ad9e9cccc52a9229676 /include/sys/dmu.h
parent8bea9815048e4b1a85905e0b381865dedd266f2d (diff)
OpenZFS 7004 - dmu_tx_hold_zap() does dnode_hold() 7x on same object
Using a benchmark which has 32 threads creating 2 million files in the same directory, on a machine with 16 CPU cores, I observed poor performance. I noticed that dmu_tx_hold_zap() was using about 30% of all CPU, and doing dnode_hold() 7 times on the same object (the ZAP object that is being held). dmu_tx_hold_zap() keeps a hold on the dnode_t the entire time it is running, in dmu_tx_hold_t:txh_dnode, so it would be nice to use the dnode_t that we already have in hand, rather than repeatedly calling dnode_hold(). To do this, we need to pass the dnode_t down through all the intermediate calls that dmu_tx_hold_zap() makes, making these routines take the dnode_t* rather than an objset_t* and a uint64_t object number. In particular, the following routines will need to have analogous *_by_dnode() variants created: dmu_buf_hold_noread() dmu_buf_hold() zap_lookup() zap_lookup_norm() zap_count_write() zap_lockdir() zap_count_write() This can improve performance on the benchmark described above by 100%, from 30,000 file creations per second to 60,000. (This improvement is on top of that provided by working around the object allocation issue. Peak performance of ~90,000 creations per second was observed with 8 CPUs; adding CPUs past that decreased performance due to lock contention.) The CPU used by dmu_tx_hold_zap() was reduced by 88%, from 340 CPU-seconds to 40 CPU-seconds. Sponsored by: Intel Corp. Signed-off-by: Matthew Ahrens <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ned Bass <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/7004 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/109 Closes #4641 Closes #4972
Diffstat (limited to 'include/sys/dmu.h')
-rw-r--r--include/sys/dmu.h13
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/include/sys/dmu.h b/include/sys/dmu.h
index 98da92890..a8ed2868f 100644
--- a/include/sys/dmu.h
+++ b/include/sys/dmu.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
- * Copyright (c) 2011, 2014 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2011, 2016 by Delphix. All rights reserved.
* Copyright 2011 Nexenta Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (c) 2012, Joyent, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright 2014 HybridCluster. All rights reserved.
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ struct sa_handle;
typedef struct objset objset_t;
typedef struct dmu_tx dmu_tx_t;
typedef struct dsl_dir dsl_dir_t;
+typedef struct dnode dnode_t;
typedef enum dmu_object_byteswap {
DMU_BSWAP_UINT8,
@@ -420,7 +421,7 @@ dmu_write_embedded(objset_t *os, uint64_t object, uint64_t offset,
#define WP_DMU_SYNC 0x2
#define WP_SPILL 0x4
-void dmu_write_policy(objset_t *os, struct dnode *dn, int level, int wp,
+void dmu_write_policy(objset_t *os, dnode_t *dn, int level, int wp,
struct zio_prop *zp);
/*
* The bonus data is accessed more or less like a regular buffer.
@@ -446,7 +447,7 @@ int dmu_rm_spill(objset_t *, uint64_t, dmu_tx_t *);
*/
int dmu_spill_hold_by_bonus(dmu_buf_t *bonus, void *tag, dmu_buf_t **dbp);
-int dmu_spill_hold_by_dnode(struct dnode *dn, uint32_t flags,
+int dmu_spill_hold_by_dnode(dnode_t *dn, uint32_t flags,
void *tag, dmu_buf_t **dbp);
int dmu_spill_hold_existing(dmu_buf_t *bonus, void *tag, dmu_buf_t **dbp);
@@ -466,6 +467,8 @@ int dmu_spill_hold_existing(dmu_buf_t *bonus, void *tag, dmu_buf_t **dbp);
*/
int dmu_buf_hold(objset_t *os, uint64_t object, uint64_t offset,
void *tag, dmu_buf_t **, int flags);
+int dmu_buf_hold_by_dnode(dnode_t *dn, uint64_t offset,
+ void *tag, dmu_buf_t **dbp, int flags);
/*
* Add a reference to a dmu buffer that has already been held via
@@ -620,6 +623,8 @@ void *dmu_buf_remove_user(dmu_buf_t *db, dmu_buf_user_t *user);
void *dmu_buf_get_user(dmu_buf_t *db);
objset_t *dmu_buf_get_objset(dmu_buf_t *db);
+dnode_t *dmu_buf_dnode_enter(dmu_buf_t *db);
+void dmu_buf_dnode_exit(dmu_buf_t *db);
/* Block until any in-progress dmu buf user evictions complete. */
void dmu_buf_user_evict_wait(void);
@@ -799,7 +804,7 @@ extern const dmu_object_byteswap_info_t dmu_ot_byteswap[DMU_BSWAP_NUMFUNCS];
int dmu_object_info(objset_t *os, uint64_t object, dmu_object_info_t *doi);
void __dmu_object_info_from_dnode(struct dnode *dn, dmu_object_info_t *doi);
/* Like dmu_object_info, but faster if you have a held dnode in hand. */
-void dmu_object_info_from_dnode(struct dnode *dn, dmu_object_info_t *doi);
+void dmu_object_info_from_dnode(dnode_t *dn, dmu_object_info_t *doi);
/* Like dmu_object_info, but faster if you have a held dbuf in hand. */
void dmu_object_info_from_db(dmu_buf_t *db, dmu_object_info_t *doi);
/*