intel: Clarify first_level/last_level vs baselevel/maxlevel by deletion.

This has always been ugly about our texture code -- object base/max
level vs intel object first/last level vs image level vs miptree
first/last level.  We now get rid of intelObj->first_level which is
just tObj->BaseLevel, and make intelObj->_MaxLevel clearly based off
of tObj->_MaxLevel instead of duplicating its code (incorrectly, as
image->MaxLog2 only considers width/height and not depth!)

2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i830_texstate.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i830_texstate.c
index 26ce5c375b6..c35b4b5ed06 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i830_texstate.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i830_texstate.c
@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ i830_update_tex_unit(struct intel_context *intel, GLuint unit, GLuint ss3)
    /* Get first image here, since intelObj->firstLevel will get set in
     * the intel_finalize_mipmap_tree() call above.
     */
-   firstImage = tObj->Image[0][intelObj->firstLevel];
+   firstImage = tObj->Image[0][tObj->BaseLevel];
 
-   intel_miptree_get_image_offset(intelObj->mt, intelObj->firstLevel, 0, 0,
+   intel_miptree_get_image_offset(intelObj->mt, tObj->BaseLevel, 0, 0,
 				  &dst_x, &dst_y);
 
    drm_intel_bo_reference(intelObj->mt->region->buffer);
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i915_texstate.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i915_texstate.c
index c724a214967..af140c85f50 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i915_texstate.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i915_texstate.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ i915_update_tex_unit(struct intel_context *intel, GLuint unit, GLuint ss3)
    /* Get first image here, since intelObj->firstLevel will get set in
     * the intel_finalize_mipmap_tree() call above.
     */
-   firstImage = tObj->Image[0][intelObj->firstLevel];
+   firstImage = tObj->Image[0][tObj->BaseLevel];
 
    drm_intel_bo_reference(intelObj->mt->region->buffer);
    i915->state.tex_buffer[unit] = intelObj->mt->region->buffer;