aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoland Scheidegger <[email protected]>2013-08-30 01:30:29 +0200
committerRoland Scheidegger <[email protected]>2013-08-30 02:16:45 +0200
commita479f34025f5f7089f45e9b7da53233db73cdf52 (patch)
tree84f3096e33a7063fb73c6d85ff5c224dcd7a95ab /src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm
parent81cfcdbd87940914fc3c59acd0e43c4f6efb3bb7 (diff)
gallivm: support per-pixel min/mag filter in SoA path
Since we can have per-pixel lod we should also honor the filter per-pixel (in fact we didn't honor it per quad neither in the multiple quad case). Do this by running the linear path and simply beating the weights into shape (the sample with the higher weight is the one which should have been chosen with nearest filtering hence adjust filter weight to 1.0/0.0 based on that). If all pixels use nearest filter (either min and mag) then still run just a nearest filter as this is way cheaper (probably around 4 times faster for 2d, more for 3d case) and it should be relatively rare that pixels really need different filtering. OTOH if all pixels would require linear don't do anything special since the linear path with filter adjustments shouldn't really be all that much more expensive than ordinary linear, and we think it's rare that min/mag filters are configured differently so there doesn't seem much value in trying to optimize this further. This does not yet fix the AoS path (though currently AoS is only used for single quads hence it could be considered less broken, just never honoring per-pixel filter decision but doing it per quad). v2: simplify code a bit (unify min linear and min nearest cases) Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm')
-rw-r--r--src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample_soa.c286
1 files changed, 243 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample_soa.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample_soa.c
index c686d82de57..7f919517cc9 100644
--- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample_soa.c
+++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_sample_soa.c
@@ -827,11 +827,14 @@ lp_build_masklerp2d(struct lp_build_context *bld,
/**
* Generate code to sample a mipmap level with linear filtering.
* If sampling a cube texture, r = cube face in [0,5].
+ * If linear_mask is present, only pixels having their mask set
+ * will receive linear filtering, the rest will use nearest.
*/
static void
lp_build_sample_image_linear(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
unsigned sampler_unit,
LLVMValueRef size,
+ LLVMValueRef linear_mask,
LLVMValueRef row_stride_vec,
LLVMValueRef img_stride_vec,
LLVMValueRef data_ptr,
@@ -905,6 +908,31 @@ lp_build_sample_image_linear(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
lp_build_name(z1, "tex.z1.layer");
}
+ if (linear_mask) {
+ /*
+ * Whack filter weights into place. Whatever pixel had more weight is
+ * the one which should have been selected by nearest filtering hence
+ * just use 100% weight for it.
+ */
+ struct lp_build_context *c_bld = &bld->coord_bld;
+ LLVMValueRef w1_mask, w1_weight;
+ LLVMValueRef half = lp_build_const_vec(bld->gallivm, c_bld->type, 0.5f);
+
+ w1_mask = lp_build_cmp(c_bld, PIPE_FUNC_GREATER, s_fpart, half);
+ /* this select is really just a "and" */
+ w1_weight = lp_build_select(c_bld, w1_mask, c_bld->one, c_bld->zero);
+ s_fpart = lp_build_select(c_bld, linear_mask, s_fpart, w1_weight);
+ if (dims >= 2) {
+ w1_mask = lp_build_cmp(c_bld, PIPE_FUNC_GREATER, t_fpart, half);
+ w1_weight = lp_build_select(c_bld, w1_mask, c_bld->one, c_bld->zero);
+ t_fpart = lp_build_select(c_bld, linear_mask, t_fpart, w1_weight);
+ if (dims == 3) {
+ w1_mask = lp_build_cmp(c_bld, PIPE_FUNC_GREATER, r_fpart, half);
+ w1_weight = lp_build_select(c_bld, w1_mask, c_bld->one, c_bld->zero);
+ r_fpart = lp_build_select(c_bld, linear_mask, r_fpart, w1_weight);
+ }
+ }
+ }
/*
* Get texture colors.
@@ -1053,8 +1081,8 @@ lp_build_sample_image_linear(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
/**
* Sample the texture/mipmap using given image filter and mip filter.
- * data0_ptr and data1_ptr point to the two mipmap levels to sample
- * from. width0/1_vec, height0/1_vec, depth0/1_vec indicate their sizes.
+ * ilevel0 and ilevel1 indicate the two mipmap levels to sample
+ * from (vectors or scalars).
* If we're using nearest miplevel sampling the '1' values will be null/unused.
*/
static void
@@ -1105,7 +1133,7 @@ lp_build_sample_mipmap(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
else {
assert(img_filter == PIPE_TEX_FILTER_LINEAR);
lp_build_sample_image_linear(bld, sampler_unit,
- size0,
+ size0, NULL,
row_stride0_vec, img_stride0_vec,
data_ptr0, mipoff0, coords, offsets,
colors0);
@@ -1131,15 +1159,8 @@ lp_build_sample_mipmap(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
* We'll do mip filtering if any of the quads (or individual
* pixel in case of per-pixel lod) need it.
* It might be better to split the vectors here and only fetch/filter
- * quads which need it.
+ * quads which need it (if there's one lod per quad).
*/
- /*
- * We unfortunately need to clamp lod_fpart here since we can get
- * negative values which would screw up filtering if not all
- * lod_fpart values have same sign.
- */
- lod_fpart = lp_build_max(&bld->lodf_bld, lod_fpart,
- bld->lodf_bld.zero);
need_lerp = lp_build_compare(bld->gallivm, bld->lodf_bld.type,
PIPE_FUNC_GREATER,
lod_fpart, bld->lodf_bld.zero);
@@ -1148,6 +1169,13 @@ lp_build_sample_mipmap(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
lp_build_if(&if_ctx, bld->gallivm, need_lerp);
{
+ /*
+ * We unfortunately need to clamp lod_fpart here since we can get
+ * negative values which would screw up filtering if not all
+ * lod_fpart values have same sign.
+ */
+ lod_fpart = lp_build_max(&bld->lodf_bld, lod_fpart,
+ bld->lodf_bld.zero);
/* sample the second mipmap level */
lp_build_mipmap_level_sizes(bld, ilevel1,
&size1,
@@ -1168,7 +1196,7 @@ lp_build_sample_mipmap(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
}
else {
lp_build_sample_image_linear(bld, sampler_unit,
- size1,
+ size1, NULL,
row_stride1_vec, img_stride1_vec,
data_ptr1, mipoff1, coords, offsets,
colors1);
@@ -1195,6 +1223,126 @@ lp_build_sample_mipmap(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
/**
+ * Sample the texture/mipmap using given mip filter, and using
+ * both nearest and linear filtering at the same time depending
+ * on linear_mask.
+ * lod can be per quad but linear_mask is always per pixel.
+ * ilevel0 and ilevel1 indicate the two mipmap levels to sample
+ * from (vectors or scalars).
+ * If we're using nearest miplevel sampling the '1' values will be null/unused.
+ */
+static void
+lp_build_sample_mipmap_both(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
+ unsigned sampler_unit,
+ LLVMValueRef linear_mask,
+ unsigned mip_filter,
+ LLVMValueRef *coords,
+ const LLVMValueRef *offsets,
+ LLVMValueRef ilevel0,
+ LLVMValueRef ilevel1,
+ LLVMValueRef lod_fpart,
+ LLVMValueRef lod_positive,
+ LLVMValueRef *colors_out)
+{
+ LLVMBuilderRef builder = bld->gallivm->builder;
+ LLVMValueRef size0 = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef size1 = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef row_stride0_vec = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef row_stride1_vec = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef img_stride0_vec = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef img_stride1_vec = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef data_ptr0 = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef data_ptr1 = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef mipoff0 = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef mipoff1 = NULL;
+ LLVMValueRef colors0[4], colors1[4];
+ unsigned chan;
+
+ /* sample the first mipmap level */
+ lp_build_mipmap_level_sizes(bld, ilevel0,
+ &size0,
+ &row_stride0_vec, &img_stride0_vec);
+ if (bld->num_mips == 1) {
+ data_ptr0 = lp_build_get_mipmap_level(bld, ilevel0);
+ }
+ else {
+ /* This path should work for num_lods 1 too but slightly less efficient */
+ data_ptr0 = bld->base_ptr;
+ mipoff0 = lp_build_get_mip_offsets(bld, ilevel0);
+ }
+
+ lp_build_sample_image_linear(bld, sampler_unit,
+ size0, linear_mask,
+ row_stride0_vec, img_stride0_vec,
+ data_ptr0, mipoff0, coords, offsets,
+ colors0);
+
+ /* Store the first level's colors in the output variables */
+ for (chan = 0; chan < 4; chan++) {
+ LLVMBuildStore(builder, colors0[chan], colors_out[chan]);
+ }
+
+ if (mip_filter == PIPE_TEX_MIPFILTER_LINEAR) {
+ struct lp_build_if_state if_ctx;
+ LLVMValueRef need_lerp;
+
+ /*
+ * We'll do mip filtering if any of the quads (or individual
+ * pixel in case of per-pixel lod) need it.
+ * Note using lod_positive here not lod_fpart since it may be the same
+ * condition as that used in the outer "if" in the caller hence llvm
+ * should be able to merge the branches in this case.
+ */
+ need_lerp = lp_build_any_true_range(&bld->lodi_bld, bld->num_lods, lod_positive);
+
+ lp_build_if(&if_ctx, bld->gallivm, need_lerp);
+ {
+ /*
+ * We unfortunately need to clamp lod_fpart here since we can get
+ * negative values which would screw up filtering if not all
+ * lod_fpart values have same sign.
+ */
+ lod_fpart = lp_build_max(&bld->lodf_bld, lod_fpart,
+ bld->lodf_bld.zero);
+ /* sample the second mipmap level */
+ lp_build_mipmap_level_sizes(bld, ilevel1,
+ &size1,
+ &row_stride1_vec, &img_stride1_vec);
+ if (bld->num_mips == 1) {
+ data_ptr1 = lp_build_get_mipmap_level(bld, ilevel1);
+ }
+ else {
+ data_ptr1 = bld->base_ptr;
+ mipoff1 = lp_build_get_mip_offsets(bld, ilevel1);
+ }
+
+ lp_build_sample_image_linear(bld, sampler_unit,
+ size1, linear_mask,
+ row_stride1_vec, img_stride1_vec,
+ data_ptr1, mipoff1, coords, offsets,
+ colors1);
+
+ /* interpolate samples from the two mipmap levels */
+
+ if (bld->num_lods != bld->coord_type.length)
+ lod_fpart = lp_build_unpack_broadcast_aos_scalars(bld->gallivm,
+ bld->lodf_bld.type,
+ bld->texel_bld.type,
+ lod_fpart);
+
+ for (chan = 0; chan < 4; chan++) {
+ colors0[chan] = lp_build_lerp(&bld->texel_bld, lod_fpart,
+ colors0[chan], colors1[chan],
+ 0);
+ LLVMBuildStore(builder, colors0[chan], colors_out[chan]);
+ }
+ }
+ lp_build_endif(&if_ctx);
+ }
+}
+
+
+/**
* Build (per-coord) layer value.
* Either clamp layer to valid values or fill in optional out_of_bounds
* value and just return value unclamped.
@@ -1637,42 +1785,94 @@ lp_build_sample_general(struct lp_build_sample_context *bld,
texels);
}
else {
- /* Emit conditional to choose min image filter or mag image filter
- * depending on the lod being > 0 or <= 0, respectively.
- */
- struct lp_build_if_state if_ctx;
-
/*
- * FIXME this should take all lods into account, if some are min
- * some max probably could hack up the weights in the linear
- * path with selects to work for nearest.
+ * Could also get rid of the if-logic and always use mipmap_both, both
+ * for the single lod and multi-lod case if nothing really uses this.
*/
- if (bld->num_lods > 1)
- lod_positive = LLVMBuildExtractElement(builder, lod_positive,
- lp_build_const_int32(bld->gallivm, 0), "");
+ if (bld->num_lods == 1) {
+ /* Emit conditional to choose min image filter or mag image filter
+ * depending on the lod being > 0 or <= 0, respectively.
+ */
+ struct lp_build_if_state if_ctx;
+
+ lod_positive = LLVMBuildTrunc(builder, lod_positive,
+ LLVMInt1TypeInContext(bld->gallivm->context), "");
+
+ lp_build_if(&if_ctx, bld->gallivm, lod_positive);
+ {
+ /* Use the minification filter */
+ lp_build_sample_mipmap(bld, sampler_unit,
+ min_filter, mip_filter,
+ coords, offsets,
+ ilevel0, ilevel1, lod_fpart,
+ texels);
+ }
+ lp_build_else(&if_ctx);
+ {
+ /* Use the magnification filter */
+ lp_build_sample_mipmap(bld, sampler_unit,
+ mag_filter, PIPE_TEX_MIPFILTER_NONE,
+ coords, offsets,
+ ilevel0, NULL, NULL,
+ texels);
+ }
+ lp_build_endif(&if_ctx);
+ }
+ else {
+ LLVMValueRef need_linear, linear_mask;
+ unsigned mip_filter_for_nearest;
+ struct lp_build_if_state if_ctx;
- lod_positive = LLVMBuildTrunc(builder, lod_positive,
- LLVMInt1TypeInContext(bld->gallivm->context), "");
+ if (min_filter == PIPE_TEX_FILTER_LINEAR) {
+ linear_mask = lod_positive;
+ mip_filter_for_nearest = PIPE_TEX_MIPFILTER_NONE;
+ }
+ else {
+ linear_mask = lp_build_not(&bld->lodi_bld, lod_positive);
+ mip_filter_for_nearest = mip_filter;
+ }
+ need_linear = lp_build_any_true_range(&bld->lodi_bld, bld->num_lods,
+ linear_mask);
+
+ if (bld->num_lods != bld->coord_type.length) {
+ linear_mask = lp_build_unpack_broadcast_aos_scalars(bld->gallivm,
+ bld->lodi_type,
+ bld->int_coord_type,
+ linear_mask);
+ }
- lp_build_if(&if_ctx, bld->gallivm, lod_positive);
- {
- /* Use the minification filter */
- lp_build_sample_mipmap(bld, sampler_unit,
- min_filter, mip_filter,
- coords, offsets,
- ilevel0, ilevel1, lod_fpart,
- texels);
- }
- lp_build_else(&if_ctx);
- {
- /* Use the magnification filter */
- lp_build_sample_mipmap(bld, sampler_unit,
- mag_filter, PIPE_TEX_MIPFILTER_NONE,
- coords, offsets,
- ilevel0, NULL, NULL,
- texels);
+ lp_build_if(&if_ctx, bld->gallivm, need_linear);
+ {
+ /*
+ * Do sampling with both filters simultaneously. This means using
+ * a linear filter and doing some tricks (with weights) for the pixels
+ * which need nearest filter.
+ * Note that it's probably rare some pixels need nearest and some
+ * linear filter but the fixups required for the nearest pixels
+ * aren't all that complicated so just always run a combined path
+ * if at least some pixels require linear.
+ */
+ lp_build_sample_mipmap_both(bld, sampler_unit,
+ linear_mask, mip_filter,
+ coords, offsets,
+ ilevel0, ilevel1,
+ lod_fpart, lod_positive,
+ texels);
+ }
+ lp_build_else(&if_ctx);
+ {
+ /*
+ * All pixels require just nearest filtering, which is way
+ * cheaper than linear, hence do a separate path for that.
+ */
+ lp_build_sample_mipmap(bld, sampler_unit,
+ PIPE_TEX_FILTER_NEAREST, mip_filter_for_nearest,
+ coords, offsets,
+ ilevel0, ilevel1, lod_fpart,
+ texels);
+ }
+ lp_build_endif(&if_ctx);
}
- lp_build_endif(&if_ctx);
}
for (chan = 0; chan < 4; ++chan) {