aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRob Clark <[email protected]>2018-07-02 10:40:36 -0400
committerRob Clark <[email protected]>2018-07-18 10:10:44 -0400
commit09f240eb5ff6c24471bd55770771b7755ad07bc0 (patch)
tree6029f02b6aaf2928cae8182185604a2c6d8728a2
parent426f1c60bced83cd9d9d026249f7e99e44aeeae6 (diff)
mesa: don't double incr/decr ActiveCounters
Frameretrace ends up w/ excess calls to SelectPerfMonitorCountersAMD() which ends up re-enabling already enabled counters. Which causes ActiveCounters[group] to be double incremented for the same counter. This causes BeginPerfMonitorAMD() to fail. The AMD_performance_monitor spec doesn't say that an error should be generated in this case. So I think the safe thing to do is just safe- guard against excess increments/decrements. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/main/performance_monitor.c12
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/performance_monitor.c b/src/mesa/main/performance_monitor.c
index 359727777ff..253d42d989c 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/performance_monitor.c
+++ b/src/mesa/main/performance_monitor.c
@@ -480,14 +480,18 @@ _mesa_SelectPerfMonitorCountersAMD(GLuint monitor, GLboolean enable,
if (enable) {
/* Enable the counters */
for (i = 0; i < numCounters; i++) {
- ++m->ActiveGroups[group];
- BITSET_SET(m->ActiveCounters[group], counterList[i]);
+ if (!BITSET_TEST(m->ActiveCounters[group], counterList[i])) {
+ ++m->ActiveGroups[group];
+ BITSET_SET(m->ActiveCounters[group], counterList[i]);
+ }
}
} else {
/* Disable the counters */
for (i = 0; i < numCounters; i++) {
- --m->ActiveGroups[group];
- BITSET_CLEAR(m->ActiveCounters[group], counterList[i]);
+ if (BITSET_TEST(m->ActiveCounters[group], counterList[i])) {
+ --m->ActiveGroups[group];
+ BITSET_CLEAR(m->ActiveCounters[group], counterList[i]);
+ }
}
}
}