summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/module
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPrakash Surya <[email protected]>2017-09-01 11:04:26 -0700
committerBrian Behlendorf <[email protected]>2017-12-06 11:38:10 -0800
commit1b2b0acab54ad4320e9fab9f46612fdb2a71cf87 (patch)
tree34549af94080a0be5bcf04b6275f08fba6b77cab /module
parent0c415a93d286ced3c552b671228e7d5d6c49d472 (diff)
OpenZFS 8603 - rename zilog's "zl_writer_lock" to "zl_issuer_lock"
This is a purely cosmetic change. The zilog's "zl_writer_lock" field is being renamed to "zl_issuer_lock" to try and make the code easier to understand; no other changes are made. Authored by: Prakash Surya <[email protected]> Reviewed by: C Fraire <[email protected]> Approved by: Dan McDonald <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Ported-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <[email protected]> OpenZFS-issue: https://www.illumos.org/issues/8603 OpenZFS-commit: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/2daf06546b Closes #6927
Diffstat (limited to 'module')
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/zil.c44
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/module/zfs/zil.c b/module/zfs/zil.c
index 5300b3408..b5685d73b 100644
--- a/module/zfs/zil.c
+++ b/module/zfs/zil.c
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ zil_lwb_write_open(zilog_t *zilog, lwb_t *lwb)
zbookmark_phys_t zb;
zio_priority_t prio;
- ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
ASSERT3P(lwb, !=, NULL);
EQUIV(lwb->lwb_root_zio == NULL, lwb->lwb_state == LWB_STATE_CLOSED);
EQUIV(lwb->lwb_root_zio != NULL, lwb->lwb_state == LWB_STATE_OPENED);
@@ -1261,7 +1261,7 @@ zil_lwb_write_issue(zilog_t *zilog, lwb_t *lwb)
int i, error;
boolean_t slog;
- ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
ASSERT3P(lwb->lwb_root_zio, !=, NULL);
ASSERT3P(lwb->lwb_write_zio, !=, NULL);
ASSERT3S(lwb->lwb_state, ==, LWB_STATE_OPENED);
@@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ zil_lwb_commit(zilog_t *zilog, itx_t *itx, lwb_t *lwb)
char *lr_buf;
uint64_t dlen, dnow, lwb_sp, reclen, txg;
- ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
ASSERT3P(lwb, !=, NULL);
ASSERT3P(lwb->lwb_buf, !=, NULL);
@@ -1837,7 +1837,7 @@ zil_get_commit_list(zilog_t *zilog)
uint64_t otxg, txg;
list_t *commit_list = &zilog->zl_itx_commit_list;
- ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
if (spa_freeze_txg(zilog->zl_spa) != UINT64_MAX) /* ziltest support */
otxg = ZILTEST_TXG;
@@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@ zil_prune_commit_list(zilog_t *zilog)
{
itx_t *itx;
- ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
while ((itx = list_head(&zilog->zl_itx_commit_list)) != NULL) {
lr_t *lrc = &itx->itx_lr;
@@ -1994,12 +1994,12 @@ zil_commit_writer_stall(zilog_t *zilog)
* crash (because the previous lwb on-disk would not point to
* it).
*
- * We must hold the zilog's zl_writer_lock while we do this, to
+ * We must hold the zilog's zl_issuer_lock while we do this, to
* ensure no new threads enter zil_process_commit_list() until
* all lwb's in the zl_lwb_list have been synced and freed
* (which is achieved via the txg_wait_synced() call).
*/
- ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
txg_wait_synced(zilog->zl_dmu_pool, 0);
ASSERT3P(list_tail(&zilog->zl_lwb_list), ==, NULL);
}
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ zil_process_commit_list(zilog_t *zilog)
lwb_t *lwb;
itx_t *itx;
- ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
/*
* Return if there's nothing to commit before we dirty the fs by
@@ -2207,17 +2207,17 @@ zil_commit_writer(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
ASSERT(spa_writeable(zilog->zl_spa));
ASSERT0(zilog->zl_suspend);
- mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
+ mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
if (zcw->zcw_lwb != NULL || zcw->zcw_done) {
/*
* It's possible that, while we were waiting to acquire
- * the "zl_writer_lock", another thread committed this
+ * the "zl_issuer_lock", another thread committed this
* waiter to an lwb. If that occurs, we bail out early,
* without processing any of the zilog's queue of itxs.
*
* On certain workloads and system configurations, the
- * "zl_writer_lock" can become highly contended. In an
+ * "zl_issuer_lock" can become highly contended. In an
* attempt to reduce this contention, we immediately drop
* the lock if the waiter has already been processed.
*
@@ -2236,13 +2236,13 @@ zil_commit_writer(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
zil_process_commit_list(zilog);
out:
- mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
+ mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
}
static void
zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
{
- ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zcw->zcw_lock));
ASSERT3B(zcw->zcw_done, ==, B_FALSE);
@@ -2254,7 +2254,7 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
* If the lwb has already been issued by another thread, we can
* immediately return since there's no work to be done (the
* point of this function is to issue the lwb). Additionally, we
- * do this prior to acquiring the zl_writer_lock, to avoid
+ * do this prior to acquiring the zl_issuer_lock, to avoid
* acquiring it when it's not necessary to do so.
*/
if (lwb->lwb_state == LWB_STATE_ISSUED ||
@@ -2263,13 +2263,13 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
/*
* In order to call zil_lwb_write_issue() we must hold the
- * zilog's "zl_writer_lock". We can't simply acquire that lock,
+ * zilog's "zl_issuer_lock". We can't simply acquire that lock,
* since we're already holding the commit waiter's "zcw_lock",
* and those two locks are aquired in the opposite order
* elsewhere.
*/
mutex_exit(&zcw->zcw_lock);
- mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
+ mutex_enter(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
mutex_enter(&zcw->zcw_lock);
/*
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
/*
* We've already checked this above, but since we hadn't
- * acquired the zilog's zl_writer_lock, we have to perform this
+ * acquired the zilog's zl_issuer_lock, we have to perform this
* check a second time while holding the lock. We can't call
* zil_lwb_write_issue() if the lwb had already been issued.
*/
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ zil_commit_waiter_timeout(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
}
out:
- mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
+ mutex_exit(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
ASSERT(MUTEX_HELD(&zcw->zcw_lock));
}
@@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@ static void
zil_commit_waiter(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
{
ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_lock));
- ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_writer_lock));
+ ASSERT(!MUTEX_HELD(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock));
ASSERT(spa_writeable(zilog->zl_spa));
ASSERT0(zilog->zl_suspend);
@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ zil_commit_itx_assign(zilog_t *zilog, zil_commit_waiter_t *zcw)
* on two fundamental concepts:
*
* 1. The creation and issuance of lwb zio's is protected by
- * the zilog's "zl_writer_lock", which ensures only a single
+ * the zilog's "zl_issuer_lock", which ensures only a single
* thread is creating and/or issuing lwb's at a time
* 2. The "previous" lwb is a child of the "current" lwb
* (leveraging the zio parent-child depenency graph)
@@ -2906,7 +2906,7 @@ zil_alloc(objset_t *os, zil_header_t *zh_phys)
zilog->zl_last_lwb_latency = 0;
mutex_init(&zilog->zl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
- mutex_init(&zilog->zl_writer_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ mutex_init(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
for (int i = 0; i < TXG_SIZE; i++) {
mutex_init(&zilog->zl_itxg[i].itxg_lock, NULL,
@@ -2953,7 +2953,7 @@ zil_free(zilog_t *zilog)
mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_itxg[i].itxg_lock);
}
- mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_writer_lock);
+ mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_issuer_lock);
mutex_destroy(&zilog->zl_lock);
cv_destroy(&zilog->zl_cv_suspend);