diff options
author | Martin Matuska <[email protected]> | 2011-07-26 13:08:02 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> | 2011-08-01 12:09:11 -0700 |
commit | ca5252204aa25f81e9f19084917e0a46fdd470b0 (patch) | |
tree | 6a4b998b3df18ac80d16d9fbf1a62039f81084c0 /module/zfs | |
parent | 3e31d2b080b4e6665a93691d171a13d7e29a768a (diff) |
Illumos #1043: Recursive zfs snapshot destroy fails
Prior to revision 11314 if a user was recursively destroying
snapshots of a dataset the target dataset was not required to
exist. The zfs_secpolicy_destroy_snaps() function introduced
the security check on the target dataset, so since then if the
target dataset does not exist, the recursive destroy is not
performed. Before 11314, only a delete permission check on
the snapshot's master dataset was performed.
Steps to reproduce:
zfs create pool/a
zfs snapshot pool/a@s1
zfs destroy -r pool@s1
Therefore I suggest to fallback to the old security check, if
the target snapshot does not exist and continue with the destroy.
References to Illumos issue and patch:
- https://www.illumos.org/issues/1043
- https://www.illumos.org/attachments/217/recursive_dataset_destroy.patch
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Issue #340
Diffstat (limited to 'module/zfs')
-rw-r--r-- | module/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/module/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c b/module/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c index 693ffc0c8..088c64b27 100644 --- a/module/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c +++ b/module/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c @@ -701,6 +701,9 @@ zfs_secpolicy_destroy(zfs_cmd_t *zc, cred_t *cr) * and destroying snapshots requires descendent permissions, a successfull * check of the top level snapshot applies to snapshots of all descendent * datasets as well. + * + * The target snapshot may not exist when doing a recursive destroy. + * In this case fallback to permissions of the parent dataset. */ static int zfs_secpolicy_destroy_snaps(zfs_cmd_t *zc, cred_t *cr) @@ -711,6 +714,8 @@ zfs_secpolicy_destroy_snaps(zfs_cmd_t *zc, cred_t *cr) dsname = kmem_asprintf("%s@%s", zc->zc_name, zc->zc_value); error = zfs_secpolicy_destroy_perms(dsname, cr); + if (error == ENOENT) + error = zfs_secpolicy_destroy_perms(zc->zc_name, cr); strfree(dsname); return (error); |