aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/module/zfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGordon Ross <[email protected]>2011-07-26 11:37:06 -0700
committerBrian Behlendorf <[email protected]>2011-08-01 12:09:11 -0700
commitef3c1dea7024b07b4ace6115de9f22a99c1394d8 (patch)
treea0528b9043a6eaf0c7b68e7f51bcbd0016c8cd1b /module/zfs
parent7b8518cb8d39aa340fecf559143763b27b212b0d (diff)
Illumos #764: panic in zfs:dbuf_sync_list
Hypothesis about what's going on here. At some time in the past, something, i.e. dnode_reallocate() calls one of: dbuf_rm_spill(dn, tx); These will do: dbuf_rm_spill(dnode_t *dn, dmu_tx_t *tx) dbuf_free_range(dn, DMU_SPILL_BLKID, DMU_SPILL_BLKID, tx) dbuf_undirty(db, tx) Currently dbuf_undirty can leave a spill block in dn_dirty_records[], (it having been put there previously by dbuf_dirty) and free it. Sometime later, dbuf_sync_list trips over this reference to free'd (and typically reused) memory. Also, dbuf_undirty can call dnode_clear_range with a bogus block ID. It needs to test for DMU_SPILL_BLKID, similar to how dnode_clear_range is called in dbuf_dirty(). References to Illumos issue and patch: - https://www.illumos.org/issues/764 - https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/3f2366c2bb Reviewed by: George Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed by: [email protected] Reviewed by: Albert Lee <[email protected] Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Issue #340
Diffstat (limited to 'module/zfs')
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/dbuf.c20
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/module/zfs/dbuf.c b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
index e166c81df..34ce2f62b 100644
--- a/module/zfs/dbuf.c
+++ b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
*/
/*
* Copyright (c) 2005, 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright 2011 Nexenta Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
*/
#include <sys/zfs_context.h>
@@ -1347,13 +1348,17 @@ dbuf_undirty(dmu_buf_impl_t *db, dmu_tx_t *tx)
* it, since one of the current holders may be in the
* middle of an update. Note that users of dbuf_undirty()
* should not place a hold on the dbuf before the call.
+ * Also note: we can get here with a spill block, so
+ * test for that similar to how dbuf_dirty does.
*/
if (refcount_count(&db->db_holds) > db->db_dirtycnt) {
mutex_exit(&db->db_mtx);
/* Make sure we don't toss this buffer at sync phase */
- mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
- dnode_clear_range(dn, db->db_blkid, 1, tx);
- mutex_exit(&dn->dn_mtx);
+ if (db->db_blkid != DMU_SPILL_BLKID) {
+ mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
+ dnode_clear_range(dn, db->db_blkid, 1, tx);
+ mutex_exit(&dn->dn_mtx);
+ }
DB_DNODE_EXIT(db);
return (0);
}
@@ -1366,11 +1371,18 @@ dbuf_undirty(dmu_buf_impl_t *db, dmu_tx_t *tx)
*drp = dr->dr_next;
+ /*
+ * Note that there are three places in dbuf_dirty()
+ * where this dirty record may be put on a list.
+ * Make sure to do a list_remove corresponding to
+ * every one of those list_insert calls.
+ */
if (dr->dr_parent) {
mutex_enter(&dr->dr_parent->dt.di.dr_mtx);
list_remove(&dr->dr_parent->dt.di.dr_children, dr);
mutex_exit(&dr->dr_parent->dt.di.dr_mtx);
- } else if (db->db_level+1 == dn->dn_nlevels) {
+ } else if (db->db_blkid == DMU_SPILL_BLKID ||
+ db->db_level+1 == dn->dn_nlevels) {
ASSERT(db->db_blkptr == NULL || db->db_parent == dn->dn_dbuf);
mutex_enter(&dn->dn_mtx);
list_remove(&dn->dn_dirty_records[txg & TXG_MASK], dr);