diff options
author | Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> | 2012-08-26 13:34:06 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov> | 2012-08-30 15:49:00 -0700 |
commit | efcd0ca32d099b0dcb556617c82403c150e6018b (patch) | |
tree | f2deca28296fc0ea9aeb6d2f9e5fd77ffef3da52 /module/splat/splat-kmem.c | |
parent | cd5ca4b2f86a606aa6ed68341a3672fdde1c9856 (diff) |
Enhance SPLAT kmem:slab_overcommit test
After the emergency slab objects were merged I started observing
timeout failures in the kmem:slab_overcommit test. These were
due to the ineffecient way the slab_overcommit reclaim function
was implemented. And due to the additional cost of potentially
allocating ten of thousands of emergency objects and tracking
them on a single list.
This patch addresses the first concern by enhansing the test
case to trace all of the allocations objects as a linked list.
This allows for a cleaner version of the reclaim function to
simply release SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_RECLAIM objects.
Since this touches some common code all the tests which share
these data structions were also updated. After making these
changes slab_overcommit is reliably passing. However, there
is certainly additional cleanup which could be done here.
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Diffstat (limited to 'module/splat/splat-kmem.c')
-rw-r--r-- | module/splat/splat-kmem.c | 401 |
1 files changed, 208 insertions, 193 deletions
diff --git a/module/splat/splat-kmem.c b/module/splat/splat-kmem.c index 284c7c30e..d0ad9a666 100644 --- a/module/splat/splat-kmem.c +++ b/module/splat/splat-kmem.c @@ -242,23 +242,22 @@ splat_kmem_test4(struct file *file, void *arg) #define SPLAT_KMEM_TEST_MAGIC 0x004488CCUL #define SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME "kmem_test" #define SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_COUNT 1024 -#define SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_RECLAIM 20 /* percent */ +#define SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_RECLAIM 1000 /* objects */ #define SPLAT_KMEM_THREADS 32 #define KCP_FLAG_READY 0x01 typedef struct kmem_cache_data { unsigned long kcd_magic; + struct list_head kcd_node; int kcd_flag; char kcd_buf[0]; } kmem_cache_data_t; typedef struct kmem_cache_thread { - kmem_cache_t *kct_cache; spinlock_t kct_lock; int kct_id; - int kct_kcd_count; - kmem_cache_data_t *kct_kcd[0]; + struct list_head kct_list; } kmem_cache_thread_t; typedef struct kmem_cache_priv { @@ -276,18 +275,15 @@ typedef struct kmem_cache_priv { int kcp_count; int kcp_alloc; int kcp_rc; - int kcp_kcd_count; - kmem_cache_data_t *kcp_kcd[0]; } kmem_cache_priv_t; static kmem_cache_priv_t * splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(struct file *file, char *name, - int size, int align, int alloc, int count) + int size, int align, int alloc) { kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp; - kcp = vmem_zalloc(sizeof(kmem_cache_priv_t) + - count * sizeof(kmem_cache_data_t *), KM_SLEEP); + kcp = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(kmem_cache_priv_t), KM_SLEEP); if (!kcp) return NULL; @@ -304,7 +300,6 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(struct file *file, char *name, kcp->kcp_count = 0; kcp->kcp_alloc = alloc; kcp->kcp_rc = 0; - kcp->kcp_kcd_count = count; return kcp; } @@ -312,34 +307,83 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(struct file *file, char *name, static void splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_free(kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp) { - vmem_free(kcp, sizeof(kmem_cache_priv_t) + - kcp->kcp_kcd_count * sizeof(kmem_cache_data_t *)); + kmem_free(kcp, sizeof(kmem_cache_priv_t)); } static kmem_cache_thread_t * -splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_alloc(int id, int count) +splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_alloc(kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp, int id) { kmem_cache_thread_t *kct; ASSERTF(id < SPLAT_KMEM_THREADS, "id=%d\n", id); - kct = vmem_zalloc(sizeof(kmem_cache_thread_t) + - count * sizeof(kmem_cache_data_t *), KM_SLEEP); + ASSERT(kcp->kcp_kct[id] == NULL); + + kct = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(kmem_cache_thread_t), KM_SLEEP); if (!kct) return NULL; spin_lock_init(&kct->kct_lock); - kct->kct_cache = NULL; kct->kct_id = id; - kct->kct_kcd_count = count; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kct->kct_list); + + spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + kcp->kcp_kct[id] = kct; + spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); return kct; } static void -splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_free(kmem_cache_thread_t *kct) +splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_free(kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp, + kmem_cache_thread_t *kct) +{ + spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + kcp->kcp_kct[kct->kct_id] = NULL; + spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + + kmem_free(kct, sizeof(kmem_cache_thread_t)); +} + +static void +splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_free(kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp, + kmem_cache_thread_t *kct) +{ + kmem_cache_data_t *kcd; + + spin_lock(&kct->kct_lock); + while (!list_empty(&kct->kct_list)) { + kcd = list_entry(kct->kct_list.next, + kmem_cache_data_t, kcd_node); + list_del(&kcd->kcd_node); + spin_unlock(&kct->kct_lock); + + kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcd); + + spin_lock(&kct->kct_lock); + } + spin_unlock(&kct->kct_lock); +} + +static int +splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_alloc(kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp, + kmem_cache_thread_t *kct, int count) { - vmem_free(kct, sizeof(kmem_cache_thread_t) + - kct->kct_kcd_count * sizeof(kmem_cache_data_t *)); + kmem_cache_data_t *kcd; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + kcd = kmem_cache_alloc(kcp->kcp_cache, KM_SLEEP); + if (kcd == NULL) { + splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_free(kcp, kct); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + spin_lock(&kct->kct_lock); + list_add_tail(&kcd->kcd_node, &kct->kct_list); + spin_unlock(&kct->kct_lock); + } + + return 0; } static void @@ -372,6 +416,7 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test_constructor(void *ptr, void *priv, int flags) if (kcd && kcp) { kcd->kcd_magic = kcp->kcp_magic; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kcd->kcd_node); kcd->kcd_flag = 1; memset(kcd->kcd_buf, 0xaa, kcp->kcp_size - (sizeof *kcd)); kcp->kcp_count++; @@ -406,51 +451,41 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test_reclaim(void *priv) { kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp = (kmem_cache_priv_t *)priv; kmem_cache_thread_t *kct; - int i, j, count; + kmem_cache_data_t *kcd; + LIST_HEAD(reclaim); + int i, count; ASSERT(kcp->kcp_magic == SPLAT_KMEM_TEST_MAGIC); - count = kcp->kcp_kcd_count * SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_RECLAIM / 100; - /* Objects directly attached to the kcp */ + /* For each kct thread reclaim some objects */ spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - for (i = 0; i < kcp->kcp_kcd_count; i++) { - if (kcp->kcp_kcd[i]) { - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcp->kcp_kcd[i]); - kcp->kcp_kcd[i] = NULL; - - if ((--count) == 0) - break; - } - } - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - - /* No threads containing objects to consider */ - if (kcp->kcp_kct_count == -1) - return; - - /* Objects attached to a kct thread */ - for (i = 0; i < kcp->kcp_kct_count; i++) { - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + for (i = 0; i < SPLAT_KMEM_THREADS; i++) { kct = kcp->kcp_kct[i]; - if (!kct) { - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + if (!kct) continue; - } + spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); spin_lock(&kct->kct_lock); - count = kct->kct_kcd_count * SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_RECLAIM / 100; - - for (j = 0; j < kct->kct_kcd_count; j++) { - if (kct->kct_kcd[j]) { - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache,kct->kct_kcd[j]); - kct->kct_kcd[j] = NULL; - if ((--count) == 0) - break; - } + count = SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_RECLAIM; + while (count > 0 && !list_empty(&kct->kct_list)) { + kcd = list_entry(kct->kct_list.next, + kmem_cache_data_t, kcd_node); + list_del(&kcd->kcd_node); + list_add(&kcd->kcd_node, &reclaim); + count--; } + spin_unlock(&kct->kct_lock); - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + } + spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + + /* Freed outside the spin lock */ + while (!list_empty(&reclaim)) { + kcd = list_entry(reclaim.next, kmem_cache_data_t, kcd_node); + list_del(&kcd->kcd_node); + kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcd); } return; @@ -485,8 +520,7 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test_thread(void *arg) { kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp = (kmem_cache_priv_t *)arg; kmem_cache_thread_t *kct; - int rc = 0, id, i; - void *obj; + int rc = 0, id; ASSERT(kcp->kcp_magic == SPLAT_KMEM_TEST_MAGIC); @@ -499,16 +533,12 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test_thread(void *arg) kcp->kcp_kct_count++; spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kct = splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_alloc(id, kcp->kcp_alloc); + kct = splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_alloc(kcp, id); if (!kct) { rc = -ENOMEM; goto out; } - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kcp->kcp_kct[id] = kct; - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - /* Wait for all threads to have started and report they are ready */ if (kcp->kcp_kct_count == SPLAT_KMEM_THREADS) wake_up(&kcp->kcp_ctl_waitq); @@ -516,34 +546,14 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test_thread(void *arg) wait_event(kcp->kcp_thr_waitq, splat_kmem_cache_test_flags(kcp, KCP_FLAG_READY)); - /* - * Updates to kct->kct_kcd[] are performed under a spin_lock so - * they may safely run concurrent with the reclaim function. If - * we are not in a low memory situation we have one lock per- - * thread so they are not expected to be contended. - */ - for (i = 0; i < kct->kct_kcd_count; i++) { - obj = kmem_cache_alloc(kcp->kcp_cache, KM_SLEEP); - spin_lock(&kct->kct_lock); - kct->kct_kcd[i] = obj; - spin_unlock(&kct->kct_lock); - } - - for (i = 0; i < kct->kct_kcd_count; i++) { - spin_lock(&kct->kct_lock); - if (kct->kct_kcd[i]) { - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kct->kct_kcd[i]); - kct->kct_kcd[i] = NULL; - } - spin_unlock(&kct->kct_lock); - } + /* Create and destroy objects */ + rc = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_alloc(kcp, kct, kcp->kcp_alloc); + splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_free(kcp, kct); out: - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - if (kct) { - splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_free(kct); - kcp->kcp_kct[id] = kct = NULL; - } + if (kct) + splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_free(kcp, kct); + spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); if (!kcp->kcp_rc) kcp->kcp_rc = rc; @@ -560,16 +570,15 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test(struct file *file, void *arg, char *name, int size, int align, int flags) { kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp; - kmem_cache_data_t *kcd; + kmem_cache_data_t *kcd = NULL; int rc = 0, max; - kcp = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(file, name, size, align, 0, 1); + kcp = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(file, name, size, align, 0); if (!kcp) { splat_vprint(file, name, "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kcp"); return -ENOMEM; } - kcp->kcp_kcd[0] = NULL; kcp->kcp_cache = kmem_cache_create(SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME, kcp->kcp_size, kcp->kcp_align, @@ -592,11 +601,8 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test(struct file *file, void *arg, char *name, rc = -EINVAL; goto out_free; } - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kcp->kcp_kcd[0] = kcd; - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - if (!kcp->kcp_kcd[0]->kcd_flag) { + if (!kcd->kcd_flag) { splat_vprint(file, name, "Failed to run contructor for '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); @@ -604,7 +610,7 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test(struct file *file, void *arg, char *name, goto out_free; } - if (kcp->kcp_kcd[0]->kcd_magic != kcp->kcp_magic) { + if (kcd->kcd_magic != kcp->kcp_magic) { splat_vprint(file, name, "Failed to pass private data to constructor " "for '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); @@ -613,10 +619,7 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test(struct file *file, void *arg, char *name, } max = kcp->kcp_count; - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcp->kcp_kcd[0]); - kcp->kcp_kcd[0] = NULL; - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcd); /* Destroy the entire cache which will force destructors to * run and we can verify one was called for every object */ @@ -636,12 +639,8 @@ splat_kmem_cache_test(struct file *file, void *arg, char *name, return rc; out_free: - if (kcp->kcp_kcd[0]) { - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcp->kcp_kcd[0]); - kcp->kcp_kcd[0] = NULL; - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - } + if (kcd) + kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcd); if (kcp->kcp_cache) kmem_cache_destroy(kcp->kcp_cache); @@ -661,7 +660,7 @@ splat_kmem_cache_thread_test(struct file *file, void *arg, char *name, char cache_name[32]; int i, rc = 0; - kcp = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(file, name, size, 0, alloc, 0); + kcp = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(file, name, size, 0, alloc); if (!kcp) { splat_vprint(file, name, "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kcp"); return -ENOMEM; @@ -755,7 +754,9 @@ splat_kmem_test5(struct file *file, void *arg) return splat_kmem_cache_test(file, arg, name, 128, 0, KMC_VMEM); } -/* Validate large object cache behavior for dynamic/kmem/vmem caches */ +/* + * Validate large object cache behavior for dynamic/kmem/vmem caches + */ static int splat_kmem_test6(struct file *file, void *arg) { @@ -773,7 +774,9 @@ splat_kmem_test6(struct file *file, void *arg) return splat_kmem_cache_test(file, arg, name, 1024*1024, 0, KMC_VMEM); } -/* Validate object alignment cache behavior for caches */ +/* + * Validate object alignment cache behavior for caches + */ static int splat_kmem_test7(struct file *file, void *arg) { @@ -789,19 +792,31 @@ splat_kmem_test7(struct file *file, void *arg) return rc; } +/* + * Validate kmem_cache_reap() by requesting the slab cache free any objects + * it can. For a few reasons this may not immediately result in more free + * memory even if objects are freed. First off, due to fragmentation we + * may not be able to reclaim any slabs. Secondly, even if we do we fully + * clear some slabs we will not want to immediately reclaim all of them + * because we may contend with cache allocations and thrash. What we want + * to see is the slab size decrease more gradually as it becomes clear they + * will not be needed. This should be achievable in less than a minute. + * If it takes longer than this something has gone wrong. + */ static int splat_kmem_test8(struct file *file, void *arg) { kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp; - kmem_cache_data_t *kcd; + kmem_cache_thread_t *kct; int i, rc = 0; kcp = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, - 256, 0, 0, SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_COUNT); + 256, 0, 0); if (!kcp) { splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kcp"); - return -ENOMEM; + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out; } kcp->kcp_cache = @@ -811,34 +826,27 @@ splat_kmem_test8(struct file *file, void *arg) splat_kmem_cache_test_reclaim, kcp, NULL, 0); if (!kcp->kcp_cache) { - splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_free(kcp); splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, "Unable to create '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); - return -ENOMEM; + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out_kcp; } - for (i = 0; i < SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_COUNT; i++) { - kcd = kmem_cache_alloc(kcp->kcp_cache, KM_SLEEP); - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kcp->kcp_kcd[i] = kcd; - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - if (!kcd) { - splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, - "Unable to allocate from '%s'\n", - SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); - } + kct = splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_alloc(kcp, 0); + if (!kct) { + splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, + "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kct"); + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out_cache; + } + + rc = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_alloc(kcp, kct, SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_COUNT); + if (rc) { + splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, "Unable to " + "allocate from '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); + goto out_kct; } - /* Request the slab cache free any objects it can. For a few reasons - * this may not immediately result in more free memory even if objects - * are freed. First off, due to fragmentation we may not be able to - * reclaim any slabs. Secondly, even if we do we fully clear some - * slabs we will not want to immedately reclaim all of them because - * we may contend with cache allocs and thrash. What we want to see - * is the slab size decrease more gradually as it becomes clear they - * will not be needed. This should be acheivable in less than minute - * if it takes longer than this something has gone wrong. - */ for (i = 0; i < 60; i++) { kmem_cache_reap_now(kcp->kcp_cache); splat_kmem_cache_test_debug(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, kcp); @@ -864,31 +872,39 @@ splat_kmem_test8(struct file *file, void *arg) } /* Cleanup our mess (for failure case of time expiring) */ - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - for (i = 0; i < SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_COUNT; i++) - if (kcp->kcp_kcd[i]) - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcp->kcp_kcd[i]); - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - + splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_free(kcp, kct); +out_kct: + splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_free(kcp, kct); +out_cache: kmem_cache_destroy(kcp->kcp_cache); +out_kcp: splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_free(kcp); - +out: return rc; } +/* Test cache aging, we have allocated a large number of objects thus + * creating a large number of slabs and then free'd them all. However, + * since there should be little memory pressure at the moment those + * slabs have not been freed. What we want to see is the slab size + * decrease gradually as it becomes clear they will not be be needed. + * This should be achievable in less than minute. If it takes longer + * than this something has gone wrong. + */ static int splat_kmem_test9(struct file *file, void *arg) { kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp; - kmem_cache_data_t *kcd; + kmem_cache_thread_t *kct; int i, rc = 0, count = SPLAT_KMEM_OBJ_COUNT * 128; kcp = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST9_NAME, - 256, 0, 0, count); + 256, 0, 0); if (!kcp) { splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST9_NAME, "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kcp"); - return -ENOMEM; + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out; } kcp->kcp_cache = @@ -897,38 +913,29 @@ splat_kmem_test9(struct file *file, void *arg) splat_kmem_cache_test_destructor, NULL, kcp, NULL, 0); if (!kcp->kcp_cache) { - splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_free(kcp); splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST9_NAME, "Unable to create '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); - return -ENOMEM; + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out_kcp; } - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { - kcd = kmem_cache_alloc(kcp->kcp_cache, KM_SLEEP); - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kcp->kcp_kcd[i] = kcd; - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - if (!kcd) { - splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST9_NAME, - "Unable to allocate from '%s'\n", - SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); - } + kct = splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_alloc(kcp, 0); + if (!kct) { + splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST8_NAME, + "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kct"); + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out_cache; } - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) - if (kcp->kcp_kcd[i]) - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcp->kcp_kcd[i]); - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); + rc = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_alloc(kcp, kct, count); + if (rc) { + splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST9_NAME, "Unable to " + "allocate from '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); + goto out_kct; + } + + splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_free(kcp, kct); - /* We have allocated a large number of objects thus creating a - * large number of slabs and then free'd them all. However since - * there should be little memory pressure at the moment those - * slabs have not been freed. What we want to see is the slab - * size decrease gradually as it becomes clear they will not be - * be needed. This should be acheivable in less than minute - * if it takes longer than this something has gone wrong. - */ for (i = 0; i < 60; i++) { splat_kmem_cache_test_debug(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST9_NAME, kcp); @@ -952,9 +959,13 @@ splat_kmem_test9(struct file *file, void *arg) rc = -ENOMEM; } +out_kct: + splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_free(kcp, kct); +out_cache: kmem_cache_destroy(kcp->kcp_cache); +out_kcp: splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_free(kcp); - +out: return rc; } @@ -971,7 +982,7 @@ splat_kmem_test10(struct file *file, void *arg) { uint64_t size, alloc, rc = 0; - for (size = 16; size <= 1024*1024; size *= 2) { + for (size = 32; size <= 1024*1024; size *= 2) { splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST10_NAME, "%-22s %s", "name", "time (sec)\tslabs \tobjs \thash\n"); @@ -1013,7 +1024,7 @@ splat_kmem_test11(struct file *file, void *arg) { uint64_t size, alloc, rc; - size = 256*1024; + size = 8 * 1024; alloc = ((4 * physmem * PAGE_SIZE) / size) / SPLAT_KMEM_THREADS; splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST11_NAME, "%-22s %s", "name", @@ -1132,7 +1143,7 @@ static int splat_kmem_test13(struct file *file, void *arg) { kmem_cache_priv_t *kcp; - kmem_cache_data_t *kcd; + kmem_cache_thread_t *kct; dummy_page_t *dp; struct list_head list; struct timespec start, delta = { 0, 0 }; @@ -1143,11 +1154,12 @@ splat_kmem_test13(struct file *file, void *arg) count = ((physmem * PAGE_SIZE) / 4 / size); kcp = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_alloc(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST13_NAME, - size, 0, 0, count); + size, 0, 0); if (!kcp) { splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST13_NAME, "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kcp"); - return -ENOMEM; + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out; } kcp->kcp_cache = @@ -1157,22 +1169,25 @@ splat_kmem_test13(struct file *file, void *arg) splat_kmem_cache_test_reclaim, kcp, NULL, 0); if (!kcp->kcp_cache) { - splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_free(kcp); splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST13_NAME, "Unable to create '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); - return -ENOMEM; + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out_kcp; } - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { - kcd = kmem_cache_alloc(kcp->kcp_cache, KM_SLEEP); - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - kcp->kcp_kcd[i] = kcd; - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - if (!kcd) { - splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST13_NAME, - "Unable to allocate from '%s'\n", - SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); - } + kct = splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_alloc(kcp, 0); + if (!kct) { + splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST13_NAME, + "Unable to create '%s'\n", "kct"); + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto out_cache; + } + + rc = splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_alloc(kcp, kct, count); + if (rc) { + splat_vprint(file, SPLAT_KMEM_TEST13_NAME, "Unable to " + "allocate from '%s'\n", SPLAT_KMEM_CACHE_NAME); + goto out_kct; } i = 0; @@ -1180,6 +1195,7 @@ splat_kmem_test13(struct file *file, void *arg) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list); start = current_kernel_time(); + /* Apply memory pressure */ while (kcp->kcp_cache->skc_slab_total > (slabs >> 2)) { if ((i % 10000) == 0) @@ -1226,15 +1242,14 @@ splat_kmem_test13(struct file *file, void *arg) } /* Release remaining kmem cache objects */ - spin_lock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - for (i = 0; i < count; i++) - if (kcp->kcp_kcd[i]) - kmem_cache_free(kcp->kcp_cache, kcp->kcp_kcd[i]); - spin_unlock(&kcp->kcp_lock); - + splat_kmem_cache_test_kcd_free(kcp, kct); +out_kct: + splat_kmem_cache_test_kct_free(kcp, kct); +out_cache: kmem_cache_destroy(kcp->kcp_cache); +out_kcp: splat_kmem_cache_test_kcp_free(kcp); - +out: return rc; } |