diff options
| author | ka7 <[email protected]> | 2017-01-03 18:31:18 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> | 2017-01-03 11:31:18 -0600 |
| commit | 4e33ba4c389f59b74138bf7130e924a4230d64e9 (patch) | |
| tree | 6707105987e45e846d0b0a5f0ad6e3e30191e77f /module/icp/asm-x86_64 | |
| parent | a5e046eaacad20487188c9eef231554e1401d8c9 (diff) | |
Fix spelling
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Giuseppe Di Natale <[email protected]>>
Reviewed-by: George Melikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Haakan T Johansson <[email protected]>
Closes #5547
Closes #5543
Diffstat (limited to 'module/icp/asm-x86_64')
| -rw-r--r-- | module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha256_impl.S | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha512_impl.S | 2 |
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha256_impl.S b/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha256_impl.S index d55c5eb48..367795668 100644 --- a/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha256_impl.S +++ b/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha256_impl.S @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ * level parallelism, on a given CPU implementation in this case. * * Special note on Intel EM64T. While Opteron CPU exhibits perfect - * perfromance ratio of 1.5 between 64- and 32-bit flavors [see above], + * performance ratio of 1.5 between 64- and 32-bit flavors [see above], * [currently available] EM64T CPUs apparently are far from it. On the * contrary, 64-bit version, sha512_block, is ~30% *slower* than 32-bit * sha256_block:-( This is presumably because 64-bit shifts/rotates diff --git a/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha512_impl.S b/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha512_impl.S index 248d8b2cc..5a49cff4b 100644 --- a/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha512_impl.S +++ b/module/icp/asm-x86_64/sha2/sha512_impl.S @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ * level parallelism, on a given CPU implementation in this case. * * Special note on Intel EM64T. While Opteron CPU exhibits perfect - * perfromance ratio of 1.5 between 64- and 32-bit flavors [see above], + * performance ratio of 1.5 between 64- and 32-bit flavors [see above], * [currently available] EM64T CPUs apparently are far from it. On the * contrary, 64-bit version, sha512_block, is ~30% *slower* than 32-bit * sha256_block:-( This is presumably because 64-bit shifts/rotates |