Non-l2arc pool reads shouldn't be l2arc misses

The current l2_misses accounting behavior treats all reads to pools 
without a configured l2arc as an l2arc miss, IFF there is at least 
one other pool on the system which does have an l2arc configured.

This makes it extremely hard to tune for an improved l2arc hit/miss 
ratio because this ratio will be modulated by reads from pools which 
do not (and should not) have l2arc devices; its upper limit will 
depend on the ratio of reads from l2arc'd pools and non-l2arc'd pools.

This PR prevents ARC reads affecting l2arc stats (n.b. l2_misses is 
the only relevant one) where the target spa doesn't have an l2arc.

Includes new test - l2arc_l2miss_pos.ksh

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: George Amanakis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Adam Moss <[email protected]>
Closes #10921

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions