diff options
author | Martin Matuska <[email protected]> | 2011-07-26 13:08:02 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> | 2011-08-01 12:09:11 -0700 |
commit | ca5252204aa25f81e9f19084917e0a46fdd470b0 (patch) | |
tree | 6a4b998b3df18ac80d16d9fbf1a62039f81084c0 /cmd/zfs | |
parent | 3e31d2b080b4e6665a93691d171a13d7e29a768a (diff) |
Illumos #1043: Recursive zfs snapshot destroy fails
Prior to revision 11314 if a user was recursively destroying
snapshots of a dataset the target dataset was not required to
exist. The zfs_secpolicy_destroy_snaps() function introduced
the security check on the target dataset, so since then if the
target dataset does not exist, the recursive destroy is not
performed. Before 11314, only a delete permission check on
the snapshot's master dataset was performed.
Steps to reproduce:
zfs create pool/a
zfs snapshot pool/a@s1
zfs destroy -r pool@s1
Therefore I suggest to fallback to the old security check, if
the target snapshot does not exist and continue with the destroy.
References to Illumos issue and patch:
- https://www.illumos.org/issues/1043
- https://www.illumos.org/attachments/217/recursive_dataset_destroy.patch
Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Issue #340
Diffstat (limited to 'cmd/zfs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions