summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOlaf Faaland <[email protected]>2015-10-15 13:08:27 -0700
committerBrian Behlendorf <[email protected]>2015-12-22 10:21:33 -0800
commit448d7aaabc55b43663c597b91b221bed982d81dd (patch)
tree89e12793ce08d38389662ff18c9336ba4be7fb9c
parente0553a74adf1b1035e1ae25ca7feacacdeb93931 (diff)
Identify locks flagged by lockdep
When running a kernel with CONFIG_LOCKDEP=y, lockdep reports possible recursive locking in some cases and possible circular locking dependency in others, within the SPL and ZFS modules. This patch uses a mutex type defined in SPL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, to mark such mutexes when they are initialized. This mutex type causes attempts to take or release those locks to be wrapped in lockdep_off() and lockdep_on() calls to silence the dependency checker and allow the use of lock_stats to examine contention. For RW locks, it uses an analogous lock type, RW_NOLOCKDEP. The goal is that these locks are ultimately changed back to type MUTEX_DEFAULT or RW_DEFAULT, after the locks are annotated to reflect their relationship (e.g. z_name_lock below) or any real problem with the lock dependencies are fixed. Some of the affected locks are: tc_open_lock: ============= This is an array of locks, all with same name, which txg_quiesce must take all of in order to move txg to next state. All default to the same lockdep class, and so to lockdep appears recursive. zp->z_name_lock: ================ In zfs_rmdir, dzp = znode for the directory (input to zfs_dirent_lock) zp = znode for the entry being removed (output of zfs_dirent_lock) zfs_rmdir()->zfs_dirent_lock() takes z_name_lock in dzp zfs_rmdir() takes z_name_lock in zp Since both dzp and zp are type znode_t, the locks have the same default class, and lockdep considers it a possible recursive lock attempt. l->l_rwlock: ============ zap_expand_leaf() sometimes creates two new zap leaf structures, via these call paths: zap_deref_leaf()->zap_get_leaf_byblk()->zap_leaf_open() zap_expand_leaf()->zap_create_leaf()->zap_expand_leaf()->zap_create_leaf() Because both zap_leaf_open() and zap_create_leaf() initialize l->l_rwlock in their (separate) leaf structures, the lockdep class is the same, and the linux kernel believes these might both be the same lock, and emits a possible recursive lock warning. Signed-off-by: Olaf Faaland <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Closes #3895
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/dbuf.c2
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/dnode.c2
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/multilist.c2
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/txg.c2
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/vdev.c2
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/zap.c2
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/zfs_znode.c2
-rw-r--r--module/zfs/zio.c2
8 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/module/zfs/dbuf.c b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
index 31242d601..fe0ffa2d8 100644
--- a/module/zfs/dbuf.c
+++ b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
@@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ dbuf_dirty(dmu_buf_impl_t *db, dmu_tx_t *tx)
}
dr->dt.dl.dr_data = data_old;
} else {
- mutex_init(&dr->dt.di.dr_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ mutex_init(&dr->dt.di.dr_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
list_create(&dr->dt.di.dr_children,
sizeof (dbuf_dirty_record_t),
offsetof(dbuf_dirty_record_t, dr_dirty_node));
diff --git a/module/zfs/dnode.c b/module/zfs/dnode.c
index 2858bbfb4..1d587b6f5 100644
--- a/module/zfs/dnode.c
+++ b/module/zfs/dnode.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ dnode_cons(void *arg, void *unused, int kmflag)
dnode_t *dn = arg;
int i;
- rw_init(&dn->dn_struct_rwlock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ rw_init(&dn->dn_struct_rwlock, NULL, RW_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
mutex_init(&dn->dn_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
mutex_init(&dn->dn_dbufs_mtx, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
cv_init(&dn->dn_notxholds, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
diff --git a/module/zfs/multilist.c b/module/zfs/multilist.c
index e4446ded2..e02a4bae3 100644
--- a/module/zfs/multilist.c
+++ b/module/zfs/multilist.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ multilist_create(multilist_t *ml, size_t size, size_t offset, unsigned int num,
for (i = 0; i < ml->ml_num_sublists; i++) {
multilist_sublist_t *mls = &ml->ml_sublists[i];
- mutex_init(&mls->mls_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ mutex_init(&mls->mls_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
list_create(&mls->mls_list, size, offset);
}
}
diff --git a/module/zfs/txg.c b/module/zfs/txg.c
index 1d5ee97b1..d5dff58ab 100644
--- a/module/zfs/txg.c
+++ b/module/zfs/txg.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ txg_init(dsl_pool_t *dp, uint64_t txg)
int i;
mutex_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
- mutex_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_open_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT,
+ mutex_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_open_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP,
NULL);
for (i = 0; i < TXG_SIZE; i++) {
cv_init(&tx->tx_cpu[c].tc_cv[i], NULL, CV_DEFAULT,
diff --git a/module/zfs/vdev.c b/module/zfs/vdev.c
index 7aff5455b..cf0d9b7d0 100644
--- a/module/zfs/vdev.c
+++ b/module/zfs/vdev.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ vdev_alloc_common(spa_t *spa, uint_t id, uint64_t guid, vdev_ops_t *ops)
list_link_init(&vd->vdev_config_dirty_node);
list_link_init(&vd->vdev_state_dirty_node);
- mutex_init(&vd->vdev_dtl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ mutex_init(&vd->vdev_dtl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
mutex_init(&vd->vdev_stat_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
mutex_init(&vd->vdev_probe_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
for (t = 0; t < DTL_TYPES; t++) {
diff --git a/module/zfs/zap.c b/module/zfs/zap.c
index c5ea392b6..4640fb98c 100644
--- a/module/zfs/zap.c
+++ b/module/zfs/zap.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ zap_create_leaf(zap_t *zap, dmu_tx_t *tx)
ASSERT(RW_WRITE_HELD(&zap->zap_rwlock));
- rw_init(&l->l_rwlock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ rw_init(&l->l_rwlock, NULL, RW_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
rw_enter(&l->l_rwlock, RW_WRITER);
l->l_blkid = zap_allocate_blocks(zap, 1);
l->l_dbuf = NULL;
diff --git a/module/zfs/zfs_znode.c b/module/zfs/zfs_znode.c
index 6fda78e5f..a3371b733 100644
--- a/module/zfs/zfs_znode.c
+++ b/module/zfs/zfs_znode.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ zfs_znode_cache_constructor(void *buf, void *arg, int kmflags)
mutex_init(&zp->z_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
rw_init(&zp->z_parent_lock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
- rw_init(&zp->z_name_lock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ rw_init(&zp->z_name_lock, NULL, RW_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
mutex_init(&zp->z_acl_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
rw_init(&zp->z_xattr_lock, NULL, RW_DEFAULT, NULL);
diff --git a/module/zfs/zio.c b/module/zfs/zio.c
index 2bc88c52c..fef56ef7b 100644
--- a/module/zfs/zio.c
+++ b/module/zfs/zio.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ zio_create(zio_t *pio, spa_t *spa, uint64_t txg, const blkptr_t *bp,
zio = kmem_cache_alloc(zio_cache, KM_SLEEP);
bzero(zio, sizeof (zio_t));
- mutex_init(&zio->io_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DEFAULT, NULL);
+ mutex_init(&zio->io_lock, NULL, MUTEX_NOLOCKDEP, NULL);
cv_init(&zio->io_cv, NULL, CV_DEFAULT, NULL);
list_create(&zio->io_parent_list, sizeof (zio_link_t),