From ae4f48b2bc3b9e1969be738fe230a7b5a880bd0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alyssa Rosenzweig Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:05:02 -0400 Subject: pan/bi: Don't set the back-to-back bit yet This is bad for performance but we can't assume it's true without some analysis, which we presently don't do. Leave it for future work and don't break the present. Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig Part-of: --- src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c b/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c index 0f72fc12713..b3f7ca605c3 100644 --- a/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c +++ b/src/panfrost/bifrost/bi_schedule.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ bi_schedule(bi_context *ctx) ids = ids & 1; last_id = u->scoreboard_id; - u->back_to_back = true; + u->back_to_back = false; u->constant_count = 1; u->constants[0] = ins->constant.u64; -- cgit v1.2.3