From 1bb339493cd892c8065266b93a296a84b1dfce9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Ekstrand Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:36:35 -0700 Subject: i965/fs: Don't do redundant RA setup on IVB+ Acked-by: Matt Turner --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp index 211f70ee942..b70895ec2ff 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_reg_allocate.cpp @@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ brw_alloc_reg_set(struct brw_compiler *compiler, int dispatch_width) int base_reg_count = BRW_MAX_GRF; int index = (dispatch_width / 8) - 1; + if (dispatch_width > 8 && devinfo->gen >= 7) { + /* For IVB+, we don't need the PLN hacks or the even-reg alignment in + * SIMD16. Therefore, we can use the exact same register sets for + * SIMD16 as we do for SIMD8 and we don't need to recalculate them. + */ + compiler->fs_reg_sets[index] = compiler->fs_reg_sets[0]; + return; + } + /* The registers used to make up almost all values handled in the compiler * are a scalar value occupying a single register (or 2 registers in the * case of SIMD16, which is handled by dividing base_reg_count by 2 and -- cgit v1.2.3