From 6d43ce54024ede3ef91fc00d00bf19b815f6396e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Keith Whitwell Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:03:53 +0000 Subject: Fix batch.ptr when dropping a batchbuffer segment due to zero cliprects. --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_ioctl.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/mesa/drivers/dri') diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_ioctl.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_ioctl.c index 2fa88b52014..ce20acbe564 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_ioctl.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_ioctl.c @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ void intelFlushBatchLocked( intelContextPtr intel, * single buffer. */ if (intel->numClipRects == 0 && !ignore_cliprects) { - intel->batch.space = intel->batch.size; /* Without this yeild, an application with no cliprects can hog * the hardware. Without unlocking, the effect is much worse - @@ -157,6 +156,8 @@ void intelFlushBatchLocked( intelContextPtr intel, /* Note that any state thought to have been emitted actually * hasn't: */ + intel->batch.ptr -= (intel->batch.size - intel->batch.space); + intel->batch.space = intel->batch.size; intel->vtbl.lost_hardware( intel ); } -- cgit v1.2.3