From 4d78446d782e2d942b4cd0cd00a27bf922ccd479 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Turner Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:34:05 -0700 Subject: glsl: Use typed foreach_in_list instead of foreach_list. Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick --- src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp') diff --git a/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp b/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp index 02f65f097cc..ec7a0c537ff 100644 --- a/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp +++ b/src/glsl/lower_jumps.cpp @@ -500,16 +500,16 @@ struct ir_lower_jumps_visitor : public ir_control_flow_visitor { /* Note: since visiting a node may change that node's next * pointer, we can't use visit_exec_list(), because * visit_exec_list() caches the node's next pointer before - * visiting it. So we use foreach_list() instead. + * visiting it. So we use foreach_in_list() instead. * - * foreach_list() isn't safe if the node being visited gets + * foreach_in_list() isn't safe if the node being visited gets * removed, but fortunately this visitor doesn't do that. */ block_record saved_block = this->block; this->block = block_record(); - foreach_list(node, list) { - ((ir_instruction *) node)->accept(this); + foreach_in_list(ir_instruction, node, list) { + node->accept(this); } block_record ret = this->block; this->block = saved_block; -- cgit v1.2.3