From ccfcb9d818b40564001b3cf2516367526de26c1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marek Olšák Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 22:16:20 -0400 Subject: ac: rename SI-CIK-VI to GFX6-GFX7-GFX8 Acked-by: Dave Airlie We already use GFX9 and I don't want us to have confusing naming in the driver. GFXn naming is better from the driver perspective, because it's the real version of the gfx portion of the hw. Also, CIK means Bonaire-Kaveri-Kabini, it doesn't mean CI. It shouldn't confuse our SDMA, UVD, VCE etc. code much. Those have nothing to do with GFXn and they have their own version numbers. --- src/amd/common/ac_surface.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/amd/common/ac_surface.h') diff --git a/src/amd/common/ac_surface.h b/src/amd/common/ac_surface.h index 10d25e23d32..08aac94d3a9 100644 --- a/src/amd/common/ac_surface.h +++ b/src/amd/common/ac_surface.h @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct radeon_surf { uint32_t cmask_alignment; union { - /* R600-VI return values. + /* Return values for GFX8 and older. * * Some of them can be set by the caller if certain parameters are * desirable. The allocator will try to obey them. -- cgit v1.2.3