From 050ce17799cbe652962f898942ae6551d31f21a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: José Fonseca Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:45:35 +0000 Subject: pipebuffer: Cleanup code & comments. --- src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_buffer_fenced.c | 18 +++++++----------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_buffer_fenced.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_buffer_fenced.c index 788bf9087f7..9282bca2eb8 100644 --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_buffer_fenced.c +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipebuffer/pb_buffer_fenced.c @@ -419,16 +419,14 @@ buffer_fence(struct pb_buffer *buf, if(buf->vtbl != &fenced_buffer_vtbl) return; + if(!fence) + return; + fenced_buf = fenced_buffer(buf); fenced_list = fenced_buf->list; winsys = fenced_list->winsys; - if(!fence || fence == fenced_buf->fence) { - /* Handle the same fence case specially, not only because it is a fast - * path, but mostly to avoid serializing two writes with the same fence, - * as that would bring the hardware down to synchronous operation without - * any benefit. - */ + if(fence == fenced_buf->fence) { fenced_buf->flags |= flags & PIPE_BUFFER_USAGE_GPU_READ_WRITE; return; } @@ -436,11 +434,9 @@ buffer_fence(struct pb_buffer *buf, pipe_mutex_lock(fenced_list->mutex); if (fenced_buf->fence) _fenced_buffer_remove(fenced_list, fenced_buf); - if (fence) { - winsys->fence_reference(winsys, &fenced_buf->fence, fence); - fenced_buf->flags |= flags & PIPE_BUFFER_USAGE_GPU_READ_WRITE; - _fenced_buffer_add(fenced_buf); - } + winsys->fence_reference(winsys, &fenced_buf->fence, fence); + fenced_buf->flags |= flags & PIPE_BUFFER_USAGE_GPU_READ_WRITE; + _fenced_buffer_add(fenced_buf); pipe_mutex_unlock(fenced_list->mutex); } -- cgit v1.2.3