| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note: This is a candidate for the 9.0 branch.
Reviewed-by: José Fonseca <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: José Fonseca <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are other similar int->float casts elsewhere in the function.
Reviewed-by: José Fonseca <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lower them to arithmetic and bit manipulation expressions.
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That is, evaluate constant expressions for the following functions:
packSnorm4x8, unpackSnorm4x8
packUnorm4x8, unpackUnorm4x8
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For each function {pack,unpack}{Snorm,Unorm}4x8, add a corresponding
opcode to enum ir_expression_operation. Validate the new opcodes in
ir_validate.cpp.
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We were using the NEED_RADEON_GALLIUM conditional to decide whether or not
to build llvm_wrapper.cpp, which is required for using the LLVM backend.
llvm_wrapper.cpp needs to be linked against the LLVM IPO libary
and this library is only added to LLVM_LIBS if either opencl or the
r600-llvm-compiler is enabled.
The NEED_RADEON_GALLIUM conditional is set to true when enabling the
radeonsi driver, so if the radeonsi and r600 drivers are enabled without
also enabling opencl or r600-llvm-compiler, llvm_wrapper.cpp will be
built, but the IPO library won't be added to LLVM_LIBS. This was
causing unresolved symbol errors when buiding with this configuration.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59831
Tested-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Dereffing all the values in the two callers was just pointless, and
the function isn't inlined so there was actual code impact.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vb.inputs_read has never been a thing, even in the initial import.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If you want debug, set --enable-debug in your config flags.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The core Mesa code has just one more case than this (GL_BITMAP), so I
don't see any cause to special-case it.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was added in b93684f5f311f89c965960ab42bfea71a397b180, but there's
no need for it -- get_size has to succeed, and it has an assert for us
in debug builds.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For our current types, the required alignment is actually just 1 byte.
When we get doubles, we have to worry (those have to be aligned to the
natural size), but we don't have doubles yet and they'll just be a
special case.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the same logic from _mesa_map_function_array().
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: A previous patch contained a spurious hunk that removed an
assignment to ir_variable::uniform_block. That hunk was moved to this
patch. Suggested by Carl Worth.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
glGetActiveUniform is not supposed to report block members that are not
active even if they are included in the layout of the block. The block
layout is determined from the GLSL_TYPE_INTERFACE that defines the
block, so eliminating the ir_variables that correspond to the individual
fields is safe.
Fixes gles3conform test
uniform_buffer_object_getuniformindices_for_for_nonexistent_or_not_active_uniform_names.
This also fixes the assertion failures (added in the previous commit) in
gles3conform uniform_buffer_object_index_of_not_active_block,
uniform_buffer_object_inherit_and_override_layouts, and
uniform_buffer_object_repeat_global_scope_layouts.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the function added in the previous commit.
This temporarily causes gles3conform
uniform_buffer_object_index_of_not_active_block,
uniform_buffer_object_inherit_and_override_layouts, and
uniform_buffer_object_repeat_global_scope_layouts to assertion fail.
This is fixed in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Calculate all of the block member offsets, the IndexNames, and
everything else to do with every UBO.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pretty much all of the compile-time, per-compilation unit block data is
about to get the axe.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
glGetUniformIndices requires that the block instance index not be
present in the name of queried uniforms. However,
gl_uniform_buffer_variable::Name will include the instance index. The
IndexName field is added to handle this difference.
Note that currently IndexName will always point to the same string as
Name. This will change soon.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
block data
Pretty much all of the compile-time, per-compilation unit block data is
about to get the axe.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This flavor takes a type and a base name. It will be used to handle
cases where the block name (instead of the instance name) is used for an
interface block.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: Inspite of the spell checker, spell recurse correctly. Suggested by
Carl Worth.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: Add a comment and an assertion about the array size in the
non-instance name case. Suggested by Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gl_uniform_block
Eventually the gl_uniform_block information won't be calculated until
linking. Block names need to be checked for name clashes during
compiling, so we have to track it differently.
v2: Update the commit message. Suggested by Carl Worth.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not used yet, but the UBO layout visitor will use this.
v2: Remove a spruious hunk. This is moved to the patch "glsl: Remove
ir_variable::uniform_block". Suggested by Carl Worth.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not used yet, but the UBO layout visitor will use this.
v2: Add some commentary as to why row_major is always set to false in
process. Suggesed by Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For the first declaration below, there will be an ir_variable named
"instance" whose type and whose instance_type will be the same
glsl_type. For the second declaration, there will be an ir_variable
named "f" whose type is float and whose instance_type is B2.
"instance" is an interface instance variable, but "f" is not.
uniform B1 {
float f;
} instance;
uniform B2 {
float f;
};
v2: Copy the comment message documentation into the code. Suggested by
Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For variables that are in an interface block or are an instance of an
interface block, this is the GLSL_TYPE_INTERFACE type for that block.
Convert the ir_variable::is_in_uniform_block method added in the
previous commit to use this field instead of ir_variable::uniform_block.
v2: Fix the place-holder comment on ir_variable::interface_type.
Suggested by Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The way a variable is tested for this property is about to change, and
this makes the code easier to modify.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the block has an instance name, add the instance name to the symbol
table instead of the individual fields.
Fixes the piglit test interface-name-access-without-interface-name.vert
for real.
v2: Update the comment before the assertion that interface block
definitions won't generate instructions. Suggested by Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interfaces are structurally identical to structures from the compiler's
point of view. They have some additional restrictions, and generally
GPUs use different instructions to access them. Using a different base
type should make this a bit easier.
This commit also adds the glsl_type::interface_packing fields. For
GLSL_TYPE_INTERFACE types, this will track the specified packing mode.
It is analogous to gl_uniform_buffer::_Packing.
v2: Add serveral missing GLSL_TYPE_INTERFACE cases in switch-statements.
v3: Add information about glsl_type::interface_packing. Move row_major
checking in glsl_type::record_key_compare from this patch to the
previous patch. Both suggested by Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For now, this will always be false. In the near future, an "interface"
type will be added that shares a lot of infrastructure with structures.
v2: Move row_major checking in glsl_type::record_key_compare from the
next patch to this patch. Suggested by Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will soon also be used for processing interface block fields.
v2: Add a comment explaining the interface of
ast_process_structure_or_interface_block. Suggested by Paul Berry.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The size is parsed and stored in the AST, but it is not used yet.
Processing of the array size is added in the patch "glsl: Handle
instance array declarations"
v2: Update the commit message (suggested by Carl Worth). Add a comment
to ast_uniform_block::array_size (suggested by Paul Berry).
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In GLSL ES 3.00 (and GLSL 1.50), uniform blocks can have an associated
"instance name", which essentially namespaces the variables inside.
This patch adds basic parsing for this new feature, but doesn't yet hook
it up to actually do anything yet.
It does not support for arrays of interface blocks; a later commit will
take care of that.
This change temporarily regresses the piglit test
interface-name-access-without-interface-name.vert. This shader failed
to compile before (the expected result), but it failed to compile for
the wrong reason. This is not a real regression.
v2: Add some comments to ast_uniform_block::instance_name. Suggested by
Paul Berry.
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing code has a lot of duplication; the only difference between
the two cases is whether we merge in an additional layout qualifier.
Apparently creating a layout_qualifieropt rule that can be empty causes
a lot of conflicts and confusion. However, refactoring out the guts of
the ast_uniform_block creation works fine.
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|