| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are due how we implemented the atomic tests, not the atomic
implementation itself. It's also difficult to refactor the code to
avoid the warnings due to the use of macros -- the code would be quite
hairy.
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add another class of tests.
Fixes https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89112
I failed to spot this in my previous change, because bool was a typedef
for char on the system I tested.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This provides for atomic addition, which will be used by an upcoming
shader-cache patch. A simple test is added to "make check" as well.
Note: The various O/S functions differ on whether they return the
original value or the value after the addition, so I did not provide
an add_return() macro which would be sensitive to that difference.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Watry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: José Fonseca <[email protected]>
|
|
|
It was much easier for me to verify things build and run as expected
with this simple test, than building and testing whole Mesa.
With scons the test can be build and run merely by doing:
scons u_atomic_test
Building the test with autotools is left as a future exercise.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
