| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems nobody's using the string hashing function. If you try to
pass it directly to the hashtable creation function, you'll get
compiler warning for non matching prototypes. Let's make them match.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Needed for bindless handles which are represented using
64-bit unsigned integers. All hash table implementations should
be uniformized later on.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use our knowledge that pointers are at least 4 byte aligned to remove
the useless digits. Then shift by 6, 10, and 14 bits and add this to
the original pointer, effectively folding in the entropy of the higher
bits of the pointer into a 4-bit section. Stopping at 14 means we can
add the entropy from 18 bits, or at least a 600Kbyte section of memory.
Assuming that ralloc allocates from a linearly allocated heap less than
this we can make a very efficient pointer hashing function for our usecase.
Even if we are not on an architecture that is 4 byte aligned, there is
still a high big chance that the thing we are allocating is at least
8 bytes in size, so even then we will have entropy into the third bit.
The 4 bit increment on the shifts is chosen rather arbitrarily; if we
had chosen a 3 bit increment we would need to add another xor to
cover a decently sized memorypool. Increasing it to 5 bits would
spread our entropy more, possibly hurting us with more collisions on
hash tables of size less than 32. With a hash table of size 16 there
are a max of 11 entries, and we can assume that with such a small table
collisions are not that painfull.
This allows us to hash the whole 32 or 64 bit pointer at once,
instead of running FNV1a, looping through each byte and doing
increments, decrements, muls, and xors on every byte. This cuts
_mesa_hash_data from 1.5 % on profiles, to making _mesa_hash_pointer
show up with a 0.09% share. Collisions on insertion actually seems to be
ever so slightly lower with this hash function, as found by printing
a loop counter and sorting the data.
perf stat shows a 1.5% reduction in instruction count,
and a 5% reduction in stalled cycles. Shader-db runtime goes
from 225 to 220 seconds.
No instruction-count changes in shader-db, but there are some minor
changes in cycle-count that is likely caused by nir walking a set
in some of its passes, and this causing a different ordering.
That might eventually lead to a difference in register allocation.
However, the effect is a net positive;
total cycles in shared programs: 24739550 -> 24738482 (-0.00%)
cycles in affected programs: 374468 -> 373400 (-0.29%)
helped: 178
HURT: 49
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is included through the util/hash_table include in
the program hash_table, so this should be safe.
This will be needed when we start converting each use of
the program_hash_table, as some places need this function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
src/util/hash_table.h:111:23: warning: ‘_mesa_fnv32_1a_offset_bias’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable]
static const uint32_t _mesa_fnv32_1a_offset_bias = 2166136261u;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
v4: coding style change (Matt Turner)
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]> (v3)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We already have search_pre_hashed. This makes the APIs match better.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way the basics of the FNV-1a hash can be reused to easily create other
hashing functions.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the hash_table API required the user to do all of the hashing
of keys as it passed them in. Since the hashing function is intrinsically
tied to the comparison function, it makes sense for the hash table to know
about it. Also, it makes for a somewhat clumsy API as the user is
constantly calling hashing functions many of which have long names. This
is especially bad when the standard call looks something like
_mesa_hash_table_insert(ht, _mesa_pointer_hash(key), key, data);
In the above case, there is no reason why the hash table shouldn't do the
hashing for you. We leave the option for you to do your own hashing if
it's more efficient, but it's no longer needed. Also, if you do do your
own hashing, the hash table will assert that your hash matches what it
expects out of the hashing function. This should make it harder to mess up
your hashing.
v2: change to call the old entrypoint "pre_hashed" rather than
"with_hash", like cworth's equivalent change upstream (change by
anholt, acked-in-general by Jason).
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This gathers macros that have been included across components into util so
that the include chain can be more vertical. In particular, this makes
util stand on its own without any dependence whatsoever on the rest of
mesa.
Signed-off-by: "Jason Ekstrand" <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
|
|
|
This hash table is used in core Mesa, the GLSL compiler, and the i965
driver, which makes it a good candidate for the new src/util module.
It's much faster than program/hash_table.[ch] (see commit 6991c2922f5
for data), and José's u_hash_table.c has a comment saying Gallium should
probably consider switching to a linear probing hash table at some point.
So this seems like the best candidate for a shared data structure.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
v2 (Jason Ekstrand): Pick up another hash_table use and patch up scons
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
|
