| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the set API required the user to do all of the hashing of keys
as it passed them in. Since the hashing function is intrinsically tied to
the comparison function, it makes sense for the hash set to know about
it. Also, it makes for a somewhat clumsy API as the user is constantly
calling hashing functions many of which have long names. This is
especially bad when the standard call looks something like
_mesa_set_add(ht, _mesa_pointer_hash(key), key);
In the above case, there is no reason why the hash set shouldn't do the
hashing for you. We leave the option for you to do your own hashing if
it's more efficient, but it's no longer needed. Also, if you do do your
own hashing, the hash set will assert that your hash matches what it
expects out of the hashing function. This should make it harder to mess up
your hashing.
This is analygous to 94303a0750 where we did this for hash_table
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This hash table is used in core Mesa, the GLSL compiler, and the i965
driver, which makes it a good candidate for the new src/util module.
It's much faster than program/hash_table.[ch] (see commit 6991c2922f5
for data), and José's u_hash_table.c has a comment saying Gallium should
probably consider switching to a linear probing hash table at some point.
So this seems like the best candidate for a shared data structure.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
v2 (Jason Ekstrand): Pick up another hash_table use and patch up scons
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Verify _mesa_lookup_texture() returned valid pointer before using it.
Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The spec incorrectly used void as return type, when it should have
been GLboolean. This has now been fixed. According to Nvidia, their
implementation always used GLboolean.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
v2: Actually implement interop between the gallium
state tracker and the VDPAU backend.
v3: Make it also available in non legacy contexts,
fix video buffer sharing.
v4: deny interop if we don't have the same screen object
v5: rebased on upstream changes
v6: implemented VDPAUGetSurfaceivNV, improved error handling,
unregister all surfaces in VDPAUFiniNV
v7: squash merge with Mareks changes
Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
|
