| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Missing from:
commit b15aba940a3b6fc7c9bebc692968e7e9b72b9f29
Author: Adam Jackson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Jul 21 11:43:42 2015 -0400
glx: Fix image size computation for EXT_texture_integer (v2)
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: Indent according to Mesa style, reuse sbc instead of making a new
swap_count field, and actually get a usable back before returning the
age of the back (fixing updated piglit tests). Changes by anholt.
Signed-off-by: Adel Gadllah <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <[email protected]> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Adel Gadllah <[email protected]> (v2)
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From the GLX perspective, the ARB and EXT extensions are identical. Use
a single bit for both.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Cc: Maciej Wieczorek <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add the infrastructure required for this extension. There is no
xserver support and no driver support yet. Drivers can enable this be
advertising DRI2 version 4 and accepting the
__DRI_CTX_FLAG_ROBUST_BUFFER_ACCESS flag and the
__DRI_CTX_ATTRIB_RESET_STRATEGY attribute in create context.
Some additional Mesa infrastructure is needed before drivers can do
this. The GL_ARB_robustness spec, which all Mesa drivers already
advertise, requires:
"If the behavior is LOSE_CONTEXT_ON_RESET_ARB, a graphics reset
will result in the loss of all context state, requiring the
recreation of all associated objects."
It is necessary to land this infrastructure now so that the related
infrastructure can land in the xserver. The xserver has very long
release schedules, and the remaining Mesa parts should land long, long
before the next xserver merge window opens.
v2: Expose robustness as a DRI2 extension rather than bumping
__DRI_DRI2_VERSION.
v3: Add a comment explaining why dri2->base.version >= 3 is also
required for GLX_ARB_create_context_robustness.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This extension is only enabled if the underlying driver advertises
support for OpenGL ES 2.0. This happens either through the getAPIMask
function in version 2 of the DRI2 extension or implicity through
version 2 of the DRISW extension.
Since there is no OpenGL ES 2.0 protocol, this extension is marked as
only available with direct-rendering.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
GLX_ARB_create_context_profile
Note that these extensions are not automatically enabled for screens
capable of direct-rendering.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are a few unsupported extensions (e.g., the ATI and NV float
extensions) that are still in the list. There is some small chance
that these may be supported some day.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this doesn't bind to drivers yet, just enough to in theory make indirect
work against other servers.
I'm really not sure what the rules for adding extensions to the known_gl_extensions list as it looks to be missing a few. are these GL extensions that have GLX
protocol??
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This extension allows a client to bind one context in multiple threads
simultaneously. It is then up to the client to manage synchronization of
access to the GL, just as normal multithreaded GL from multiple contexts
requires synchronization management to shared objects.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Because double underscores in private type names is painful.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Only r200 implemented it.
|
| |
|
