| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jose Fonseca <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
In addition to exercising all of the functions in blob.h, this
includes a stress test that forces some reallocing, and also tests to
verify the alignment and overrun-detection code in blob.c.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ever since the addition of interface blocks with instance names, we have
had an implicit invariant:
var->type->is_interface() ==
(var->type == var->interface_type)
The odd use of == here is intentional because !var->type->is_interface()
implies var->type != var->interface_type.
Further, if var->type->is_array() is true, we have a related implicit
invariant:
var->type->fields.array->is_interface() ==
(var->type->fields.array == var->interface_type)
However, the ir_variable constructor doesn't maintain either invariant.
That seems kind of silly... and I tripped over it while writing some
other code. This patch makes the constructor do the right thing, and it
introduces some tests to verify that behavior.
v2: Add general-ir-test to .gitignore. Update the description of the
ir_variable invariant for arrays in the commit message. Both suggested
by Paul.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I rarely run 'git status', so I failed to notice this was missing.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I started writing unit tests for a new piece of code, and discovered
they all failed due to a bug in ralloc. Clearly it needs a test suite.
v2: Rename to 'ralloc-test' and fix copyright date. (idr review)
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
This runs optimization-test and produces the usual automake test
output, which may be interesting to automated build systems.
This doesn't convert the tests to be individually exposed to the
automake runner, because automake doesn't like wildcards (due to being
nonportable in make, not that we care).
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
