| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously the loop_state was allocated in the loop_analysis
constructor, but not freed in the (nonexistent) destructor. Moving
the allocation of the loop_state makes this code appear less sketchy.
Either way, there is no actual leak. The loop_state is freed by the
single caller of analyze_loop_variables.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While ~loop_state() is already freeing the loop_variable_state objects
via ralloc_free(this->mem_ctx), the ~loop_variable_state() destructor
was never getting called, so the hash table inside loop_variable_state
was never getting destroyed.
Fixes a memory leak in any shader with loops.
NOTE: This is a candidate for stable release branches.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Function calls may have side effects that alter variables used inside
the loop. In the fragment shader, they may even terminate the shader.
This means our analysis about loop-constant or induction variables may
be completely wrong.
In general it's impossible to determine whether they actually do or not
(due to the halting problem), so we'd need to perform conservative
static analysis. For now, it's not worth the complexity: most functions
will be inlined, at which point we can unroll them successfully.
Fixes Piglit tests:
- shaders/glsl-fs-unroll-out-param
- shaders/glsl-fs-unroll-side-effect
NOTE: This is a candidate for release branches.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Shaves 1.6% (+/- 1.0%) off of ff_fragment_shader glean texCombine time
(n=5).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This increases the chance that GLSL programs will actually work.
Note that continues and returns are not yet lowered, so linking
will just fail if not supported.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the next step on the road to loop unrolling
|
|
This is the first step eventually leading to loop unrolling.
|