| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The glcpp parser is line-based, so it needs to see a NEWLINE token at the end
of each line. This causes a trick for files that end without a final newline.
Previously, the lexer for glcpp punted in this case by unconditionally
returning a NEWLINE token at end-of-file, (causing most files to have an extra
blank line at the end). Here, we refine this by lexing end-of-file as a
NEWLINE token only if the immediately preceding token was not a NEWLINE token.
The patch is a minor change that only looks huge for two reasons:
1. Almost all glcpp test result ".expected" files are updated to drop
the extra newline.
2. All return statements from the lexer are adjusted to use a new
RETURN_TOKEN macro that tracks the last-token-was-a-newline state.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The glcpp implementation has long had code to support a file that ends without
a final newline. But we didn't have a "make check" test for this.
Additionally, the <EOF> action was restricted only to the <INITIAL> state so
it would fail to get invoked if the EOF was encountered in the <COMMENT> or
the <DEFINE> case. Neither of these was a bug, per se, since EOF in either
of these cases is an error anyway, (either "unterminated comment" or
"missing macro name for #define").
But with the new explicit support for these cases, we not generate clean error
messages in these cases, (rather than "unexpected $end" from before).
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The recent adddition of an error for "#define followed by a non-identifier"
was a bit to aggressive since it used a regular expression in the lexer to
flag any character that's not legal as the first character of an identifier.
But we need to allow comments to appear here, (since we aren't removing
comments in a preliminary pass). So we refine the error here to only flag
characters that could not be an identifier, nor a comment, nor whitespace.
We also augment the existing comment support to be active in the <DEFINE>
state as well.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, if the preprocessor encountered a #define with a non-identifier,
such as:
#define 123 456
The lexer had no explicit rules to match non-identifiers in the <DEFINE> start
state. Because of this, flex's default rule was being invoked, (printing
characters to stdout), and all text was being discarded by the compiler until
the next identifier. As one can imagine, this led to all sorts of interesting
and surprising results.
Fix this by adding an explicit rule complementing the existing
identifier-based rules that should catch all non-identifiers after #define and
reliably give a well-formatted error message.
A new test is added to "make check" to ensure this bug stays fixed.
This commit also fixes the following Khronos GLES3 CTS test:
define_non_identifier_vertex
(The "fragment" variant was passing earlier only because the preprocessor was
behaving so randomly and causing the compilation to fail. It's lucky, in fact,
that the "vertex" version succesfully compiled so we could find and fix this
bug.)
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test simply has one of each directive, all of which are preceded by a
single space character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The glcpp lexer and parser use the space_tokens state bit to avoid emitting
tokens for spaces while parsing a directive. Previously, this bit was only
being set again by the first non-space token following a directive.
This led to a bug where a space, (or a comment that should emit a space),
immediately following a directive, (optionally searated by newlines), would be
omitted from the output.
Here we fix the bug by also setting the space_tokens bit whenever we lex a
newline in the standard start conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The lexer was insisting that there be at least one character after "#pragma"
and before the end of the line. This caused an error for a line consisting
only of "#pragma" which volates at least the following sentence from the GLSL
ES Specification 3.00.4:
The scope as well as the effect of the optimize and debug pragmas is
implementation-dependent except that their use must not generate an
error. [Page 12 (Page 28 of PDF)]
and likely the following sentence from that specification and also in
GLSLangSpec 4.30.6:
If an implementation does not recognize the tokens following #pragma,
then it will ignore that pragma.
Add a "make check" test to ensure no future regressions.
This change fixes at least part of the following Khronos GLES3 CTS test:
preprocessor.pragmas.pragma_vertex
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We've always warned about this case, but a recent confromance test expects
this to be an error that causes compilation to fail. Make it so.
Also add a "make check" test to ensure these errors are generated.
This fixes the following Khronos GLES3 conformance tests:
invalid_conditionals.tokens_after_ifdef_vertex
invalid_conditionals.tokens_after_ifdef_fragment
invalid_conditionals.tokens_after_ifndef_vertex
invalid_conditionals.tokens_after_ifndef_fragment
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While writing the previous commit message, I just felt bad documenting the
shortcoming of the change, (that undefined macro names would not be reported
in error messages).
Fix this by preserving the first-encounterd undefined macro name and reporting
that in any resulting error message.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The GLSL ES Specification 3.00.4 says:
#if, #ifdef, #ifndef, #else, #elif, and #endif are defined to operate
as for C++ except for the following:
...
• Undefined identifiers not consumed by the defined operator do not
default to '0'. Use of such identifiers causes an error.
[Page 11 (page 127 of the PDF file)]
as well as:
The semantics of applying operators in the preprocessor match those
standard in the C++ preprocessor with the following exceptions:
• The 2nd operand in a logical and ('&&') operation is evaluated if
and only if the 1st operand evaluates to non-zero.
• The 2nd operand in a logical or ('||') operation is evaluated if
and only if the 1st operand evaluates to zero.
If an operand is not evaluated, the presence of undefined identifiers
in the operand will not cause an error.
(Note that neither of these deviations from C++ preprocessor behavior apply to
non-ES GLSL, at least as of specfication version 4.30.6).
The first portion of this, (generating an error for an undefined macro in an
(short-circuiting to squelch errors), was not implemented previously, but is
implemented in this commit.
A test is added for "make check" to ensure this behavior.
Note: The change as implemented does make the error message a bit less
precise, (it just states that an undefined macro was encountered, but not the
name of the macro).
This commit fixes the following Khronos GLES3 conformance test:
undefined_identifiers.valid_undefined_identifier_1_vertex
undefined_identifiers.valid_undefined_identifier_1_fragment
undefined_identifiers.valid_undefined_identifier_2_vertex
undefined_identifiers.valid_undefined_identifier_2_fragment
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The preprocessor defines a notions of a "preprocessing number" that
starts with either a digit or a decimal point, and continues with zero
or more of digits, decimal points, identifier characters, or the sign
symbols, ('-' and '+').
Prior to this change, preprocessing numbers were lexed as some
combination of OTHER and IDENTIFIER tokens. This had the problem of
causing undesired macro expansion in some cases.
We add tests to ensure that the undesired macro expansion does not
happen in cases such as:
#define e +1
#define xyz -2
int n = 1e;
int p = 1xyz;
In either case these macro definitions have no effect after this
change, so that the numeric literals, (whether valid or not), will be
passed on as-is from the preprocessor to the compiler proper.
This fixes the following Khronos GLES3 CTS tests:
preprocessor.basic.correct_phases_vertex
preprocessor.basic.correct_phases_fragment
v2. Thanks to Anuj Phogat for improving the original regular expression,
(which accepted a '+' or '-', where these are only allowed after one of
[eEpP]. I also expanded the test to exercise this.
v3. Also fixed regular expression to require at least one digit at the
beginning (after an optional period). Otherwise, a string such as ".xyz" was
getting sucked up as a preprocessing number, (where obviously this should be a
field access). Again, I expanded the test to exercise this.
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, a line such as:
#else garbage
would flag an error if it followed "#if 0", but not if it followed "#if 1".
We fix this by setting a new bit of state (lexing_else) that allows the lexer
to defer switching to the <SKIP> start state until after the NEWLINE following
the #else directive.
A new test case is added for:
#if 1
#else garbage
#endif
which was untested before, (and did not generate the desired error).
This fixes the following Khronos GLES3 CTS tests:
tokens_after_else_vertex
tokens_after_else_fragment
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the test suite was expecting the compiler to allow a redefintion
of a macro with whitespace added, but gcc is more strict and allows only for
changes in the amounts of whitespace, (but insists that whitespace exist or
not in exactly the same places).
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Undefining-and-Redefining-Macros.html:
These definitions are effectively the same:
#define FOUR (2 + 2)
#define FOUR (2 + 2)
#define FOUR (2 /* two */ + 2)
but these are not:
#define FOUR (2 + 2)
#define FOUR ( 2+2 )
#define FOUR (2 * 2)
#define FOUR(score,and,seven,years,ago) (2 + 2)
This change adjusts the existing "redefine-macro-legitimate" test to work with
the more strict understanding, and adds a new "redefine-whitespace" test to
verify that changes in the position of whitespace are flagged as errors.
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently verifying that an #undef of __FILE__, __LINE__, or __VERSION__ will
generate an error.
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After preprocessing by glcpp all adjacent spaces were replaced by
single one and glsl parser received column-shifted shader source.
It negatively affected ast location set up and produced wrong error
messages for heavily-spaced shaders.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Section 3.3 (Preprocessor) of the GLSL 1.30 spec (and later) and the
GLSL ES spec (all versions) say:
"All macro names containing two consecutive underscores ( __ ) are
reserved for future use as predefined macro names. All macro names
prefixed with "GL_" ("GL" followed by a single underscore) are also
reserved."
The intention is that names containing __ are reserved for internal use
by the implementation, and names prefixed with GL_ are reserved for use
by Khronos. Since every extension adds a name prefixed with GL_ (i.e.,
the name of the extension), that should be an error. Names simply
containing __ are dangerous to use, but should be allowed. In similar
cases, the C++ preprocessor specification says, "no diagnostic is
required."
Per the Khronos bug mentioned below, a future version of the GLSL
specification will clarify this.
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Cc: "9.2 10.0 10.1" <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Darius Spitznagel <[email protected]>
Cc: Tapani Pälli <[email protected]>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71870
Bugzilla: Khronos #11702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the innocent-looking but killer test case to verify the bug fixed in
the preceding commit.
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The preprocessor currently accepts multiple else/elif-groups
per if-section. The GLSL-preprocessor is defined by the C++
specification, which defines the following parse-rule:
if-section:
if-group elif-groups(opt) else-group(opt) endif-line
This clearly only allows a single else-group, that has to come
after any elif-groups.
So let's modify the code to follow the specification. Add test
to prevent regressions.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Cc: 10.0 <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
definition)
The preprocessor has always replaced multi-line comments with a single space
character, (as required by the specification), but as of commit
bd55ba568b301d0f764cd1ca015e84e1ae932c8b the lexer also emitted a NEWLINE
token for each newline within the comment, (in order to preserve line
numbers).
The emitting of NEWLINE tokens within the comment broke the rule of "replace a
multi-line comment with a single space" as could be exposed by code like the
following:
#define FOO a/*
*/b
FOO
Prior to commit bd55ba568b301d0f764cd1ca015e84e1ae932c8b, this code defined
the macro FOO as "a b" as desired. Since that commit, this code instead
defines FOO as "a" and leaves a stray "b" in the output.
In this commit, we fix this by not emitting the NEWLINE tokens while lexing
the comment, but instead merely counting them in the commented_newlines
variable. Then, when the lexer next encounters a non-commented newline it
switches to a NEWLINE_CATCHUP state to emit as many NEWLINE tokens as
necessary (so that subsequent parsing stages still generate correct line
numbers).
Of course, it would have been more clear if we could have written a loop to
emit all the newlines, but flex conventions prevent that, (we must use
"return" for each token we emit).
It similarly would have been clear to have a new rule restricted to the
<NEWLINE_CATCHUP> state with an action much like the body of this if
condition. The problem with that is that this rule must not consume any
characters. It might be possible to write a rule that matches a single
lookahead of any character, but then we would also need an additional rule to
ensure for the <EOF> case where there are no additional characters available
for the lookahead to match.
Given those considerations, and given that the SKIP-state manipulation already
involves a code block at the top of the lexer function, before any rules, it
seems best to me to go with the implementation here which adds a similar
pre-rule code block for the NEWLINE_CATCHUP.
Finally, this commit also changes the expected output of a few, existing glcpp
tests. The change here is that the space character resulting from the
multi-line comment is now emitted before the newlines corresponding to that
comment. (Previously, the newlines were emitted first, and the space character
afterward.)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72686
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To trigger the bug, it suffices to have a line-continuation followed by
a newline and then a non-line-continuation backslash.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removing the subdirectory recursion provides a small speed up.
Tested-by: Andreas Boll <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
First we test that line continuations are honored within a comment, (as
recently changed in glcpp), then we test that line continuations can be
disabled via an option within the context. This is tested via the new support
for a test-specific command-line option passed to glcpp.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will allow the test exercising disabled line continuations to arrange
for the --disable-line-continuations argument to be passed to the standalone
glcpp.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test file is very similar to test 113-line-and-file-macros but uses token
pasting for cleaner quiz answers (without spaces between the digits). This
test passes thanks to the recent addition of support for pasting INTEGER
tokens, (but would have failed without that).
(Note that this test is distinct from test 059-token-pasting-integer which
pastes integers parsed from the source. Those are parsed to INTEGER_STRING
tokens and are already pasted correctly as verified by that test. The only way
to generate the INTEGER tokens which currently fail to paste is with an
internal define such as __LINE__ that results in an integer.)
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code lets a few invalid pastes through, such as an string pasted
onto the end of an integer. Extend the invalid-paste test to catch some of
these.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These tokens are easy to expand by just looking at the current, tracked
location values, (and no need to look anything up in the hash table).
Add a test which verifies __LINE__ with several values, (and verifies __FILE__
for the single value of 0). Our testing framework isn't sophisticated enough
here to have a test with multiple file inputs.
This commit fixes part of es3conform's preprocess16_frag test.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And add test cases to ensure that this works
- 110 verifies that glcpp rejects #elif<digits> which glcpp
previously accepted.
- 111 verifies that glcpp accepts #if followed immediately by
(, +, -, !, or ~.
- 112 does the same as 111 but for #elif.
See 17f9beb6 for #if change.
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes part of es3conform's preprocess16_frag test.
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51802
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51506
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41152
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
By moving the HASH_LINE rule out of control_line: and into line:, we avoid
adding control_line's additional \n (as seen in the first hunk).
mattst88: Carl and I determined independently of Fabian that the 091
test needed to be modified identically to this, and our patch to fix the
test was more complicated.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51506
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously we were accepting garbage after #else and #endif tokens when
the previous preprocessor conditional evaluated to false (eg, #if 0).
When the preprocessor hits a false conditional, it switches the lexer
into the SKIP state, in which it ignores non-control tokens. The parser
pops the SKIP state off the stack when it reaches the associated #elif,
#else, or #endif. Unfortunately, that meant that it only left the SKIP
state after the lexing the entire line containing the #token and thus
would accept garbage after the #token.
To fix this we use a mid-rule, which is executed immediately after the
#token is parsed.
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branch
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56442
Fixes: preprocess17_frag.test from oglconform
Reviewed-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]> (glcpp-parse.y)
Acked-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The most recent commit adds support for comments and macro expansion
on #line directives. Add testing to verify the new features.
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The GLSL specification requires that #line directives be interpreted
after macro expansion. Our existing implementation of #line macros in
the lexer prevents conformance on this point.
Moving the handling of #line from the lexer to the parser gives us the
macro expansion we need. An additional benefit is that the
preprocessor also now supports comments on the same line as #line
directives.
Finally, the preprocessor now emits the (fully-macro-expanded) #line
directives into the output. This allows the full GLSL compiler to also
see and interpret these directives so it can also generate correct
line numbers in error messages.
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A strict reading of the GLSL specification would have this be an
error, but we've received reports from users who expect the
preprocessor to interepret undefined macros as 0. This is the standard
behavior of the rpeprocessor for C, and according to these user
reports is also the behavior of other OpenGL implementations.
So here's one of those cases where we can make our users happier by
ignoring the specification. And it's hard to imagine users who really,
really want to see an error for this case.
The two affected tests cases are updated to reflect the new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This test cases exposes a bug as described in this bug report:
"ralloc.c:78: get_header: Assertion `info->canary == 0x5A1106'
failed." when using a macro in GLSL
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45082
Clearly, some memory is getting (incorrectly) freed on the first macro
invocation, leading to problems with the second macro invocation.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This demonstrates a bug that was recently triggered in piglit.
Here is the original bug report (containing a test case almost identical
to this one):
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44764
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 2bb9f9e1fda61fceb9284cbb4619d7e60e39f190.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Success was (tests-passed AND valgrind-tests-passed) but this meant that
if the valgrind tests weren't run it would be considered a failure.
The logic is now (tests-passed AND (!valgrind OR valgrind-tests-passed))
which lets us return success if the valgrind tests aren't run.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As written, this test correctly raises an error for #elif being used
with an undefined macro (and not as an argument to "defined"). If the
preceding #if were '#if 1' then this diagnositc would correctly be
hidden. That allows code such as the following to not raise an error:
#ifndef MAYBE_UNDEFINED
#elif MAYBE_UNDEFINED < 5
...
#endif
So this test case is working as expected already. We add it here just
to improve test coverage.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The specification reserves any macro name containing two consecutive
underscores, (anywhere within the name). Previously, we only raised
this error for macro names that started with two underscores.
Fix the implementation to check for two underscores anywhere, and also
update the corresponding 086-reserved-macro-names test.
This also fixes the following two piglit tests:
spec/glsl-1.30/preprocessor/reserved/double-underscore-02.frag
spec/glsl-1.30/preprocessor/reserved/double-underscore-03.frag
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apparently we never implemented this, (but we've got a GLSL 1.30 test
in piglit that is exercising this case).
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is something that piglit is exercising that currently fails.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's clear enough that the current segmentation fault isn't what we
want. And it's also very easy to know what we do want here, (just
check with any functional C preprocessor such as "gcc -E").
Add the desired output as an expected file so that the test suite
gives useful output, (showing the omitted output and the segfault),
rather than just reporting "No such file" for the expected file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The common case for this test suite is to quickly test that everything
returns the correct results. In this case, the second run of the test
suite under valgrind was just annoying, (and the user would often
interrupt it).
Now, do what is wanted in the common case by default (just run the
test suite), and require a run with "glcpp-test --valgrind" in order
to test with valgrind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The expected file here captures the current behavior of glcpp (which
is to generate an obscure "syntax error, unexpected $end" diagnostic
for this case).
It would certainly be better for glcpp to generate a nicer diagnostic,
(such as "missing closing parenthesis in function-like macro
definition" or so), but the current behavior is at least correct, and
expected. So we can make the test suite more useful by marking the
current behavior as expected.
|