summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/glsl/glcpp/tests
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* glsl: Add glcpp tests for a macro used twiceCarl Worth2012-02-022-0/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This test cases exposes a bug as described in this bug report: "ralloc.c:78: get_header: Assertion `info->canary == 0x5A1106' failed." when using a macro in GLSL https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45082 Clearly, some memory is getting (incorrectly) freed on the first macro invocation, leading to problems with the second macro invocation. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
* glcpp: Add new test showing bug where a trailing ':' prevents macro expansionCarl Worth2012-02-022-0/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | This demonstrates a bug that was recently triggered in piglit. Here is the original bug report (containing a test case almost identical to this one): https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44764 Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
* Revert "src/glsl/glcpp: wire up glcpp-test to make check"Matt Turner2012-01-311-5/+1
| | | | This reverts commit 2bb9f9e1fda61fceb9284cbb4619d7e60e39f190.
* src/glsl/glcpp: wire up glcpp-test to make checkMatt Turner2012-01-301-1/+5
| | | | | | Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> Tested-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
* glcpp-test: don't return failure if valgrind tests aren't runMatt Turner2012-01-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | Success was (tests-passed AND valgrind-tests-passed) but this meant that if the valgrind tests weren't run it would be considered a failure. The logic is now (tests-passed AND (!valgrind OR valgrind-tests-passed)) which lets us return success if the valgrind tests aren't run. Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> Tested-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
* glcpp: Add a test for #elif with an undefined macro.Carl Worth2011-09-302-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As written, this test correctly raises an error for #elif being used with an undefined macro (and not as an argument to "defined"). If the preceding #if were '#if 1' then this diagnositc would correctly be hidden. That allows code such as the following to not raise an error: #ifndef MAYBE_UNDEFINED #elif MAYBE_UNDEFINED < 5 ... #endif So this test case is working as expected already. We add it here just to improve test coverage. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
* glcpp: Raise error if defining any macro containing two consecutive underscoresCarl Worth2011-09-302-1/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The specification reserves any macro name containing two consecutive underscores, (anywhere within the name). Previously, we only raised this error for macro names that started with two underscores. Fix the implementation to check for two underscores anywhere, and also update the corresponding 086-reserved-macro-names test. This also fixes the following two piglit tests: spec/glsl-1.30/preprocessor/reserved/double-underscore-02.frag spec/glsl-1.30/preprocessor/reserved/double-underscore-03.frag Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
* glcpp: Test a non-function-like macro using the token paste operatorCarl Worth2011-09-302-0/+7
| | | | | | | | Apparently we never implemented this, (but we've got a GLSL 1.30 test in piglit that is exercising this case). Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
* glcpp: Add a test for a macro that implements token pasting twice.Carl Worth2011-09-302-0/+7
| | | | | | | This is something that piglit is exercising that currently fails. Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <[email protected]>
* Add expected file for 095-recursive-define test case.Carl Worth2011-04-141-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | It's clear enough that the current segmentation fault isn't what we want. And it's also very easy to know what we do want here, (just check with any functional C preprocessor such as "gcc -E"). Add the desired output as an expected file so that the test suite gives useful output, (showing the omitted output and the segfault), rather than just reporting "No such file" for the expected file.
* glcpp: Add --valgrind option to the glcpp-test utilityCarl Worth2011-04-141-16/+46
| | | | | | | | | | | The common case for this test suite is to quickly test that everything returns the correct results. In this case, the second run of the test suite under valgrind was just annoying, (and the user would often interrupt it). Now, do what is wanted in the common case by default (just run the test suite), and require a run with "glcpp-test --valgrind" in order to test with valgrind.
* Add an expected file for 084-unbalanced-parenthesesCarl Worth2011-04-141-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | The expected file here captures the current behavior of glcpp (which is to generate an obscure "syntax error, unexpected $end" diagnostic for this case). It would certainly be better for glcpp to generate a nicer diagnostic, (such as "missing closing parenthesis in function-like macro definition" or so), but the current behavior is at least correct, and expected. So we can make the test suite more useful by marking the current behavior as expected.
* Add an expected file for 094-divide-by-zero-short-circuitCarl Worth2011-04-142-0/+26
| | | | | | | | | | | The expected file here captures the current behavior of glcpp (which is to generate a division-by-zero error) for this case. It's easy to argue that it should be short-circuiting the evaluation and not generating the diagnostic (which happens to be what gcc does). But it doesn't seem like we should force this behavior on our pre-processor, (and, as always, the GLSL specification of the pre-processor is too vague on this point).
* Add an expected file for 093-divide-by-zeroCarl Worth2011-04-141-0/+4
| | | | | | This test is behaving just fine already---it's generating an informative diagnostic, ("error: division by 0 in preprocessor directive"), so adding this in the expected file makes things pass.
* glcpp/tests: Update 063-comments.c.expected to match output.Kenneth Graunke2011-03-031-0/+7
| | | | | | | The expected result has been out of sync with what glcpp produces for some time; glcpp's actual result seems to be correct and is very close to GCC's cpp. Updating this will make it easier to catch regressions in upcoming commits.
* Revert "glcpp: Demote "macro redefined" from an error to a warning"Carl Worth2011-01-291-6/+6
| | | | | | | | This reverts commit d3df641f0aba99b0b65ecd4d9b06798bca090a29. The original commit had sat unpushed on my machine for months. By the time I found it again, I had forgotten that we had decided not to use this change after all, (the relevant test was removed long ago).
* glcpp: Demote "macro redefined" from an error to a warningCarl Worth2011-01-281-6/+6
| | | | | | | | | | The GLSL specification is vague here, (just says "as is standard for C++"), though the C specifications seem quite clear that this should be an error. However, an existing piglit test (CorrectPreprocess11.frag) expects this to be a warning, not an error, so we change this, and document in README the deviation from the specification.
* glcpp: Add test for recursive #define.Vinson Lee2011-01-041-0/+3
|
* glcpp: Add division by zero test cases.Vinson Lee2011-01-042-0/+4
|
* glcpp: Add negative tests for redefintions with valueless macros.Vinson Lee2010-12-272-0/+15
|
* glcpp: Fix test suite to avoid flagging failed tests as valgrind errors.Carl Worth2010-08-231-4/+5
| | | | | | | | | | We recently added several tests that intentionally trigger preprocessor errors. During valgrind-based testing, our test script was noticing the non-zero return value from the preprocessor and incorrectly flagging the valgrind-based test as failing. To fix this, we make valgrind return an error code that is otherwise unused by the preprocessor.
* glcpp: Add new test for #line directive.Carl Worth2010-08-232-0/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | This test exposes two current bugs: 1. The source number is not being correctly emitted in error messages (instead, it's always 0). 2. A directive of "#line 0" is resulting in the following parse error: preprocessor error: Invalid tokens after #
* glcpp: Add test for the #error directive.Carl Worth2010-08-232-0/+4
| | | | | | | This directive is already implemented nicely, but wasn't previously tested. It will be convenient to use this directive in further tests that rely on error messages, (such as ensuring that #line correctly sets the line number in the error message).
* glcpp: Add two new tests for testing redefined macros.Carl Worth2010-08-174-0/+58
| | | | | | The specification says that redefining a macro is an error, unless the new definitions is identical to the old one, (identical replacement lists but ignoring differing amounts of whitespace).
* glcpp: Fix 064-version.c expected result to track recent change.Carl Worth2010-08-171-1/+0
| | | | | | In commit 6be3a8b70af4ba4fa4d037d54ecf6d5f055edbc9, the #version directive was fixed to stop generating a spurious newline. Here we simply update the expected result for the single test which includes a #version directive.
* glcpp: Add testcase for #if handling bug that breaks Savage2.Eric Anholt2010-08-172-0/+11
|
* glcpp: Fix "unterminated if" diagnostic.Carl Worth2010-08-111-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | This was previously being appended to the output string *after* a copy of the supposedly final string was made and handed to the caller. So the diagnostic was never actually visible to the user. We fix this by moving the check for an unterminated #if from glcpp_parser_destroy to the calling function, preprocess. This fixes the test case 083-unterminated-if.c.
* glcpp: Add an explicit diagnostic for #if with no expression.Carl Worth2010-08-111-1/+4
| | | | | | | This is more clear than the previously-generated diagnostic which was something confusing like "enexpected newline". This change makse test 080-if-witout-expression.c now pass.
* glcpp: Reword diagnostic for #elif with no expressionCarl Worth2010-08-111-1/+0
| | | | | | Rather than telling the user what to fix, the standard convention is to describe what the detected problem is. With this change, test 081-elif-without-expression now passes.
* glcpp: Add several tests for diagnostics.Carl Worth2010-08-1120-0/+72
| | | | | | Which are proving to be useful since some of these tests are not yet acting as desired, (in particular, the unterminated if test is not generating any diagnostic).
* glcpp-test: Capture the stderr output of the preprocessor.Carl Worth2010-08-111-1/+1
| | | | This allows writing tests that verify diagnostics from the preprocessor.
* glcpp: Clean up intermediate file when test suite is interrupted.Carl Worth2010-08-111-0/+2
| | | | | The glcpp-test script was leaving around bogus *.valgrind-errors files if a valgrind test was interrupted.
* glcpp: Additional fixes for not evaluating skipped #if/#elif expressions.Carl Worth2010-08-114-0/+20
| | | | | | This adds a couple of test cases to expand our coverage of invalid #if and being skipped, (either by being nested inside an #if/#elif that evaluates to zero or by being after an #if/#elif that evaluates to non-zero).
* glcpp/tests: Commit forgotten file 074-elif-undef.c.expected.Kenneth Graunke2010-08-101-0/+4
|
* glcpp: Discard output of cmp when running the test suite.Carl Worth2010-08-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | We're already using the return-value of cmp to print either PASS or FAIL and in the case of failure, we're subsequently running and showing the output of diff. So any warnings/errors from cmp itself are not actually needed, and can be quite confusing.
* glcpp: Fix expected result for the 064-version.c test.Carl Worth2010-08-101-0/+1
| | | | | | Commit d4a04f315560704bf1103df0b93723e468725df7 caused this test case to produce an additional blank line, which is otherwise harmless, but does need to be reflected in the .expected file for the test to pass.
* glcpp/tests: Add a corollary to testcase 073 for testing #elif.Kenneth Graunke2010-08-041-0/+3
|
* glcpp/tests: Fix 073-if-in-ifdef.c to use #ifdef, not #if.Kenneth Graunke2010-08-041-1/+1
| | | | The original intention was to use #ifdef.
* glcpp: Add a testcase for the failure in compiling xonotic's shader.Eric Anholt2010-08-012-0/+9
| | | | gcc and mesa master agree that this is OK.
* glcpp: Add expected output for a recently-added test.Carl Worth2010-07-281-0/+3
| | | | I simply forgot to add this file when adding the test case originally.
* glcpp: Fix function-like macros with an argument used multiple times.Carl Worth2010-07-221-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | It's really hard to believe that this case has been broken, but apparently no test previously exercised it. So this commit adds such a test and fixes it by making a copy of the argument token-list before expanding it. This fix causes the following glean tests to now pass: glsl1-Preprocessor test 6 (#if 0, #define macro) glsl1-Preprocessor test 7 (multi-line #define)
* glcpp: Avoid accidental token pasting in preprocessed result.Carl Worth2010-07-204-2/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consider this test case: #define EMPTY int foo = 1+EMPTY+4; The expression should compile as the sequence of tokens 1, PLUS, UNARY_POSITIVE, 4. But glcpp has been failing for this case since it results in the string "1++4" which a compiler correctly sees as a syntax error, (1, POST_INCREMENT, 4). We fix this by changing any macro with an empty definition to result in a single SPACE token rather than nothing. This then gives "1+ +4" which compiles correctly. This commit does touch up the two existing test cases which already have empty macros, (to add the space to the expected result). It also adds a new test case to exercise the above scenario.
* glcpp: Fix support for nested #ifdef and nested #ifndefCarl Worth2010-07-202-0/+81
| | | | | | | | | | | Previously, if the outer #ifdef/#ifndef evaluated to false, the inner directive would not be parsed correctly, (the identifier as the subject of the #ifdef/#ifndef would inadvertently be skipped along with the other content correctly being skipped). We fix this by setting the lexing_if state in each case here. We also add a new test to the test suite to ensure that this case is tested.
* glcpp: Support #if(expression) with no intervening space.Carl Worth2010-07-202-0/+7
| | | | And add a test case to ensure that this works.
* glcpp: Make test suite test for valgrind cleanliness.Carl Worth2010-07-201-1/+21
| | | | | | As it turns out, 4 of our current tests are not valgrind clean, (use after free errors or so), so this will be helpful for investigating and fixing those.
* glcpp: Make test suite report final count of passed/total tests.Carl Worth2010-07-201-2/+22
| | | | And report PASS or FAIL for each test along the way as well.
* glsl2: Move the compiler to the subdirectory it will live in in Mesa.Eric Anholt2010-06-24139-0/+889