| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NIR does not have these instructions. TGSI and Mesa IR both implement
them using < and >=, repsectively. Removing them deletes a bunch of
code and means I don't have to add code to the SPIR-V generator for
them.
v2: Rebase on 2+ years of change... and fix a major bug added in the
rebase.
text data bss dec hex filename
8255291 268856 294072 8818219 868e2b 32-bit i965_dri.so before
8254235 268856 294072 8817163 868a0b 32-bit i965_dri.so after
7815339 345592 420592 8581523 82f193 64-bit i965_dri.so before
7813995 345560 420592 8580147 82ec33 64-bit i965_dri.so after
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old code assumed that loop terminators will always be at
the start of the loop, resulting in otherwise unrollable
loops not being unrolled at all. For example the current
code would unroll:
int j = 0;
do {
if (j > 5)
break;
... do stuff ...
j++;
} while (j < 4);
But would fail to unroll the following as no iteration limit was
calculated because it failed to find the terminator:
int j = 0;
do {
... do stuff ...
j++;
} while (j < 4);
Also we would fail to unroll the following as we ended up
calculating the iteration limit as 6 rather than 4. The unroll
code then assumed we had 3 terminators rather the 2 as it
wasn't able to determine that "if (j > 5)" was redundant.
int j = 0;
do {
if (j > 5)
break;
... do stuff ...
if (bool(i))
break;
j++;
} while (j < 4);
This patch changes this pass to be more like the NIR unrolling pass.
With this change we handle loop terminators correctly and also
handle cases where the terminators have instructions in their
branches other than a break.
V2:
- fixed regression where loops with a break in else were never
unrolled in v1.
- fixed confusing/wrong naming of bools in complex unrolling.
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
do-while loops can increment the starting value before the
condition is checked. e.g.
do {
ndx++;
} while (ndx < 3);
This commit changes the code to detect this and reduces the
iteration count by 1 if found.
V2: fix terminator spelling
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Elie Tournier <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <[email protected]>
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jose Fonseca <[email protected]>
|
