| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both GFX6 and GFX9 fields are printed next to each other in parsed IBs.
The Python script parses both headers like one stream and tries to merge
all definitions.
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Otherwise we read past the end of the buffer.
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is for handling chained command buffers and secondary command
buffers. It doesn't handle the trace id for secondary command buffers
yet, but I don't think that is possible in general with just writes,
as we could call a secondary command buffer multiple times.
I think this is good enough for now, as the most useful case is the
chaining when we grow an IB.
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
|