| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to the W3C, we shouldn't use the br-tag unless the line-break
is part of the content:
https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-author-20110809/the-br-element.html
All of these instances are for non-content usage, and is as such technically
out-of-spec. So let's either remove them, or split paragraphs, based on
how related the content are.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For newcomers to gitlab, it is not evident that it is better to press
the "Resolve Discussion" button when you update your branch handling
feedback.
v2:
* Fix several grammar nits, reorder, use new corrected text (Connor
Abbot)
* Use "reviewers", instead of reviewer (Eric Engestrom)
Reviewed-by: Connor Abbott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's generally frowned upon to have more than one H1 per document in
HTML4. So let's put the text directly inside the header. This means we
can drop the flex-based centering, which makes things a bit easier. We
also need to change the padding to rem instead of em, because the em has
now changed.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We're pretty insonsistent in what the headings and titles are, especially
compared to what the articles are listed as in the sidebar. Let's
harmonize this.
There's a notable exception for meson.html, where the sidebar uses a
short-hand form that makes sense in the sidebar, but not in the article
due to the visible context being different.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's illegal to nest block-level elements such as <pre> inside <p> in
HTML. This means that when the paragraphs gets closed after a <pre>-tag,
we end up closing a non-existent tag, so the browser inserts a dummy
<p>-tag. This is entirely pointless, so let's just close these tags
before the <pre>-tag instead.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
paragraphs can't contain lists, and attempting to close them after
the list just cause an extra, empty paragraph to be created. We don't
want that, so let's close the paragraphs before the list intead.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mention the tick-box otherwise only the MR author can rebase the series.
Cc: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Cc: Dylan Baker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reivewed-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sending MRs from the main Mesa repository increase clutter in the
repository, and decrease visibility of project-wide branches. So it's
better if MRs are sent from forks instead.
Let's add a note about this, in case its not obvious to everyone.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
So that gitlab will render the < and > correctly allowing the tag to be
copy-n-pasted without additional formatting.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Across several projects I've seen new contributors say "I wasn't sure if I
should provide a review tag since I'm not really an expert in this area."
Everyone I know already applies some implicit weighting to reviews from
different people, so encourage participation.
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: Mention "Tested-by" too
Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]> (v1)
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This documents a process for using GitLab Merge Requests as an second
way to submit code changes for Mesa. Only one of the two methods is
allowed for each patch series.
We will *not* require all patches to be emailed. Some code changes may
be reviewed and merged without any discussion on the mesa-dev email
list.
v2:
* No longer require email. Allow submitter to choose email or a
GitLab merge request.
* Various feedback from Brian, Daniel, Dylan, Eric, Erik, Jason,
Matt, Michel and Rob.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Erik Faye-Lund <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A while back we agreed that having a live/staging branch is beneficial.
Sadly we forgot to document that, so here is my first attempt.
Document the caveat that the branch history is not stable.
CC: Andres Gomez <[email protected]>
CC: Dylan Baker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Juan A. Suarez <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As pointed out by the w3c validator.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Juan A. Suarez <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cc: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andres Gomez <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For the next time I forget.
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Noticed a couple, found the rest using vimspell.
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide information and an example.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The version tag used to nominate has bitten even experienced mesa
developers. Not to mention that it deviates from the one used in the
kernel leading to further confusion.
Simplify things and omit it all together.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provide information about merge conflicts resolution and sending
backports.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reword the section to focus on what is allowed, using a more brief, yet
descriptive wording.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cc: Ben Crocker <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Ben Crocker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of them already redirected to https anyway, so we might as well
avoid the redirection and the security implications by linking directly
to the right protocol.
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Document what has been the unofficial way to self-reject stable patches.
Namely: drop the mesa-stable tag and push the commit.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: ba28f2136febca32fe56 ("docs: add note about r-b/other tags when resending")
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[Emil Velikov: split from the typos fixes]
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andres Gomez <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Mention the script - why/how to use alongside a useful trick to make it
work interactively (thanks Rob!).
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Elie Tournier <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: [Emil Velikov]
- Add the shorthand git send-email -vX
- Move to submittingpatches.html
- Add to the TOC.
v3: [Emil Velikov]
- Use @~8 instead of HEAD~8 (Nicolai)
Cc: Timothy Arceri <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]> (v1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the odd tag so that we're HTML 4.01 Traditional compliant
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently they are buried within the text, making it hard to find.
Move them to the top and be clear what is _not_ a good idea.
v2: Minor commit polish, use only "resending" as suggested by Matt.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
|