| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old way of nominating patches [NOTE: .*[Cc]andidate] was
deprecated and has been unused for approx. 3 years.
Cc: "13.0 17.0" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Analogous to previous commit.
Cc: "13.0 17.0" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We recently proposed a new syntax for stable-patch nominations such as:
CC: "9.2 and 9.1" <[email protected]>
and this has already appeared in the wild.
So we extend the regular expression to pick this up as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We recently adopted a new convention that patches can be nominated for the
stable branch by including a line in the commit message as follows:
CC: [email protected]
This is a convenient syntax as "git send-email" will notice this line and
automatically copy the resulting patch email to the mesa-stable mailing list.
Here we extend the regular expression in the get-pick-list.sh script to also
notice this pattern, (as well as the traditional "NOTE: This patch is a
candidate..." form.
|
|
|
|
| |
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Several commits on master for the 9.1 branch had "NOTE" messages in a
slightly different format.
NOTE: This is a candidate for stable branches
Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and save them temporary in already_picked
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cuts down the while loop iterations from 4600 to 380 commits at the
moment
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and add a description for the script
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches.
|