| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It should speed up the Python packages installation.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
As that's what most people are bound to use.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
That's what we (and I suppose most people out there) are using now.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The git core.autocrlf setting defaults to true (ie, all text files get
checked out as CRLF on Windows), except on Appveyor where's set to
"input" (ie, all text files get checked out with the upstream
repository's line endings, which for us typically means LF.)
And this was masking on Appveyor a regression in gen_xmlpool.py
processing t_options.h with CRLF line endings.
This change makes core.autocrlf to be true, which would have enabled to
immediately catch the issue, as seen in
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jrfonseca/mesa/build/51
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jrfonseca/mesa/build/47
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The MSVC version we (at VMware) primarily care about from now on is
2015.
See https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jrfonseca/mesa/build/46
We can drop support for building with 2013 in a future commit. I'm not
aware of significant changes in C99/C11 support from MSVC 2013 to 2015,
but there's no point in continuing supporting old MSVC versions when
nobody cares.
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Use explicit versions everywhere.
- Avoid deprecate `--egg` pip option.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
| |
This particular version got moved into a `old_versions` subdirectory.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
It seems the default build image is now Visual Studio 2015, and Visual
Studio 2013 is not installed.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
AppVeyor build images seem to have been upgraded to Python 2.7.12, but
no longer have pywin32 pre-installed.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To prevent build failures when a large patch series is committed, like
happened in https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jrfonseca-fdo/mesa/build/322
due to 10 commits between dac2964f3ebd96d5ac227984ab0cd79c2c3b2a1a and
6f428328d34bed16edb8709e4a117eb710d7893d where submitted before the
build slave started the git clone.
100 commits should be bigger than any patch series seen in practice, and
it takes practically the same time to download as 5 commits.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unforunately the Appveyor -> SourceForge connection seems a bit
unreliable, causing frequent build failures while downloading
winflexbison (approx once every 2 days).
Fetching winflexbison archive into Appveyor's cache should eliminate
these.
Fetching Python modules from PyPI doesn't seem to be a problem, so they
are left alone for now, though they could eventually get the same
treatment.
|
|
|
AppVeyor doesn't require an appveyor.yml in the repos (in fact it has
some limitations as noted in comments below), but doing so has two great
advantages over the web UI:
- appveyor.yml can be revisioned together with the code, so instructions
should always be in synch with the code
- appveyor.yml can be reused for people's private repositories (be on
fdo or GitHub, etc.)
Acked-by: Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]>
|
