| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Corresponding to GL_ARB_fragment_shader_interlock and
GL_NV_fragment_shader_interlock. Currently, only the NIR paths
support this functionality, but someone could conceivably add it
to TGSI too.
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the future I want to expand this to 128-bits, for vec16 support, so
lets just put the code in place to use bitset ranges now.
v2: just declare the bitset to be the max of what we should ever see
and change assert to reflect it.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just use a variable already.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Our tessellation control shaders can be dispatched in several modes.
- SINGLE_PATCH (Gen7+) processes a single patch per thread, with each
channel corresponding to a different patch vertex. PATCHLIST_N will
launch (N / 8) threads. If N is less than 8, some channels will be
disabled, leaving some untapped hardware capabilities. Conditionals
based on gl_InvocationID are non-uniform, which means that they'll
often have to execute both paths. However, if there are fewer than
8 vertices, all invocations will happen within a single thread, so
barriers can become no-ops, which is nice. We also burn a maximum
of 4 registers for ICP handles, so we can compile without regard for
the value of N. It also works in all cases.
- DUAL_PATCH mode processes up to two patches at a time, where the first
four channels come from patch 1, and the second group of four come
from patch 2. This tries to provide better EU utilization for small
patches (N <= 4). It cannot be used in all cases.
- 8_PATCH mode processes 8 patches at a time, with a thread launched per
vertex in the patch. Each channel corresponds to the same vertex, but
in each of the 8 patches. This utilizes all channels even for small
patches. It also makes conditions on gl_InvocationID uniform, leading
to proper jumps. Barriers, unfortunately, become real. Worse, for
PATCHLIST_N, the thread payload burns N registers for ICP handles.
This can burn up to 32 registers, or 1/4 of our register file, for
URB handles. For Vulkan (and DX), we know the number of vertices at
compile time, so we can limit the amount of waste. In GL, the patch
dimension is dynamic state, so we either would have to waste all 32
(not reasonable) or guess (badly) and recompile. This is unfortunate.
Because we can only spawn 16 thread instances, we can only use this
mode for PATCHLIST_16 and smaller. The rest must use SINGLE_PATCH.
This patch implements the new 8_PATCH TCS mode, but leaves us using
SINGLE_PATCH by default. A new INTEL_DEBUG=tcs8 flag will switch to
using 8_PATCH mode for testing and benchmarking purposes. We may
want to consider using 8_PATCH mode in Vulkan in some cases.
The data I've seen shows that 8_PATCH mode can be more efficient in
some cases, but SINGLE_PATCH mode (the one we use today) is faster
in other cases. Ultimately, the TES matters much more than the TCS
for performance, so the decision may not matter much.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will be significantly different in 8_PATCH mode.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Having a single flag will keep both places in sync if the condition
gets more complicated.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The payload field is actually "instance" (thread number), which is used
to calculate the invocation ID.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When we add 8_PATCH mode, this will get a bit more complex, so we may
as well start by putting it in a helper function.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This lets us get devinfo and other misc. compiler settings.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
just a cleanup
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This helps fix:
piglit/bin/ext_image_dma_buf_import-sample_yuv -fmt=NV12 -auto
Fixes: d88f3392fff7c6342f3840c4bd8195a1296c2372
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This diverged back in f1374805a86d ("drm-uapi: use local files, not system
libdrm") to point at drm-uapi's copy, which we don't need now that we're
actually in drm-uapi.
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new location matches other drivers, and has a README about the rules
for updating it.
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The goal is to avoid having an extra MOV instruction to perform the
saturate. Doing the subtraction first allows the saturate to be applied
to the ADD instruction making the MOV unnecessary. Values generated in
different block and values from non-ALU instructions (e.g., texture
instructions) almost always need the extra MOV.
Multiply instructions are restricted because doing this rearrangement
can interfere with the generation of flrp and ffma instructions.
v2: Now that the final method has been selected, squash three commits
into one.
All Intel platforms has similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17223214 -> 17219386 (-0.02%)
instructions in affected programs: 1524376 -> 1520548 (-0.25%)
helped: 2686
HURT: 26
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 32 x̄: 1.44 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.03% max: 16.67% x̄: 0.54% x̃: 0.37%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 2 x̄: 1.69 x̃: 2
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.33% max: 1.67% x̄: 0.54% x̃: 0.35%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.46 -1.36
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.56% -0.50%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360811571 -> 360791896 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 103650214 -> 103630539 (-0.02%)
helped: 1557
HURT: 675
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1773 x̄: 41.44 x̃: 16
helped stats (rel) min: <.01% max: 26.77% x̄: 1.37% x̃: 0.64%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1513 x̄: 66.44 x̃: 14
HURT stats (rel) min: <.01% max: 46.16% x̄: 2.00% x̃: 0.49%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -14.82 -2.81
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.50% -0.20%
Cycles are helped.
LOST: 2
GAINED: 0
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]> [v1]
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(0, 1)
v2: Fix copy-and-paste bug in a cmp b vs b cmp a cases.
All Gen7+ platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17224337 -> 17224269 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 13578 -> 13510 (-0.50%)
helped: 68
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1 x̄: 1.00 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.31% max: 3.12% x̄: 0.84% x̃: 0.42%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.00 -1.00
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -1.05% -0.63%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360826090 -> 360825137 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 94867 -> 93914 (-1.00%)
helped: 58
HURT: 1
helped stats (abs) min: 2 max: 28 x̄: 17.74 x̃: 18
helped stats (rel) min: 0.08% max: 3.17% x̄: 1.39% x̃: 1.22%
HURT stats (abs) min: 76 max: 76 x̄: 76.00 x̃: 76
HURT stats (rel) min: 2.86% max: 2.86% x̄: 2.86% x̃: 2.86%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -19.53 -12.78
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -1.56% -1.08%
Cycles are helped.
No changes on any other Intel platform.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All Intel platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17224623 -> 17224337 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 32648 -> 32362 (-0.88%)
helped: 148
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 2 x̄: 1.93 x̃: 2
helped stats (rel) min: 0.16% max: 2.74% x̄: 1.07% x̃: 1.08%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.97 -1.89
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -1.15% -1.00%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360828714 -> 360826090 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 347416 -> 344792 (-0.76%)
helped: 148
HURT: 26
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 426 x̄: 26.33 x̃: 18
helped stats (rel) min: 0.03% max: 15.10% x̄: 1.78% x̃: 1.41%
HURT stats (abs) min: 2 max: 337 x̄: 48.96 x̃: 6
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.04% max: 18.82% x̄: 2.15% x̃: 0.27%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -23.78 -6.38
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -1.59% -0.79%
Cycles are helped.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A tiny bit of help seems to come from nir_copy_prop. Future patches
will benefit from this change.
Doing more copy propagation on the vec4 backend led to a disaster in
hurt cycles.
v2: Fix typo in comment. Noticed by Matt.
All Gen8+ platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17224634 -> 17224623 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 4586 -> 4575 (-0.24%)
helped: 11
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1 x̄: 1.00 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.19% max: 0.53% x̄: 0.27% x̃: 0.23%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.00 -1.00
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.36% -0.19%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360828542 -> 360828714 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 151159 -> 151331 (0.11%)
helped: 49
HURT: 28
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 254 x̄: 26.41 x̃: 6
helped stats (rel) min: 0.06% max: 12.02% x̄: 1.34% x̃: 0.42%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 196 x̄: 52.36 x̃: 15
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.05% max: 10.74% x̄: 2.55% x̃: 0.88%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -13.48 17.95
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.69% 0.84%
Inconclusive result (value mean confidence interval includes 0).
Haswell, Ivy Bridge, and Sandy Bridge had similar results. (Haswell shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 13529544 -> 13529542 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 358 -> 356 (-0.56%)
helped: 2
HURT: 0
total cycles in shared programs: 357290311 -> 357289678 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 178324 -> 177691 (-0.35%)
helped: 48
HURT: 40
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 201 x̄: 31.52 x̃: 13
helped stats (rel) min: 0.06% max: 10.92% x̄: 1.71% x̃: 0.66%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 224 x̄: 22.00 x̃: 6
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.05% max: 15.84% x̄: 1.29% x̃: 0.31%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -18.28 3.89
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -1.01% 0.32%
Inconclusive result (value mean confidence interval includes 0).
Iron Lake and GM45 had similar results. (Iron Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 8159110 -> 8158980 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 22719 -> 22589 (-0.57%)
helped: 65
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 3 x̄: 2.00 x̃: 2
helped stats (rel) min: 0.07% max: 1.05% x̄: 0.73% x̃: 0.74%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -2.06 -1.94
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.78% -0.68%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 188609448 -> 188609214 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 1875852 -> 1875618 (-0.01%)
helped: 109
HURT: 104
helped stats (abs) min: 2 max: 46 x̄: 5.30 x̃: 4
helped stats (rel) min: 0.02% max: 0.90% x̄: 0.09% x̃: 0.07%
HURT stats (abs) min: 2 max: 20 x̄: 3.31 x̃: 2
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.01% max: 0.26% x̄: 0.04% x̃: 0.02%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -1.95 -0.25
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.04% -0.01%
Cycles are helped.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 7acc8652268205a266068ea4d059eccce43e1f78.
With these optimizations in place, the extra constant folding added in
the next commit extends some live ranges of 0.0 and ±1.0 constants, and
that causes several hundred shaders to have more spills and fills.
I believe this optimization we made basically irrelevant by 7725d609387
"intel/fs: Emit better code for b2f(inot(a)) and b2i(inot(a))".
All Gen7.5+ platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17225303 -> 17224634 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 879402 -> 878733 (-0.08%)
helped: 679
HURT: 1
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1 x̄: 1.00 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.03% max: 0.93% x̄: 0.24% x̃: 0.05%
HURT stats (abs) min: 10 max: 10 x̄: 10.00 x̃: 10
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.45% max: 0.45% x̄: 0.45% x̃: 0.45%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.02 -0.95
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.26% -0.22%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360842595 -> 360828542 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 110443594 -> 110429541 (-0.01%)
helped: 389
HURT: 265
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 7525 x̄: 162.81 x̃: 28
helped stats (rel) min: <.01% max: 18.66% x̄: 1.11% x̃: 0.11%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 7614 x̄: 185.96 x̃: 48
HURT stats (rel) min: <.01% max: 25.08% x̄: 0.95% x̃: 0.10%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -75.65 32.67
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.49% -0.06%
Inconclusive result (value mean confidence interval includes 0).
total spills in shared programs: 12159 -> 12161 (0.02%)
spills in affected programs: 13 -> 15 (15.38%)
helped: 0
HURT: 1
total fills in shared programs: 25207 -> 25208 (<.01%)
fills in affected programs: 25 -> 26 (4.00%)
helped: 0
HURT: 1
Ivy Bridge
total instructions in shared programs: 12082019 -> 12082013 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 1033 -> 1027 (-0.58%)
helped: 6
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1 x̄: 1.00 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.41% max: 0.83% x̄: 0.61% x̃: 0.59%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.00 -1.00
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.78% -0.45%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 179849270 -> 179849157 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 4735 -> 4622 (-2.39%)
helped: 4
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 2 max: 74 x̄: 28.25 x̃: 18
helped stats (rel) min: 0.13% max: 6.53% x̄: 2.85% x̃: 2.36%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -82.73 26.23
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -7.98% 2.28%
Inconclusive result (value mean confidence interval includes 0).
Sandy Bridge
total instructions in shared programs: 10882750 -> 10882748 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 266 -> 264 (-0.75%)
helped: 2
HURT: 0
Iron Lake
total cycles in shared programs: 188609440 -> 188609448 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 4320 -> 4328 (0.19%)
helped: 0
HURT: 2
GM45
total cycles in shared programs: 129016868 -> 129016872 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 2302 -> 2306 (0.17%)
helped: 0
HURT: 1
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The value-range tracking pass that is coming is not clever enough to
know that the result of the ffma must be non-negative. Making it that
smart will require quite a bit of work. It might be possible to add a
special case that detects that a whole tree of fadd(fmul(fsat(a),
fneg(fsat(a))), 1.0) cannot be negative.
For cases when the comparison is used in the domain guard for a
square-root (see nir/algebraic: Simplify fsqrt domain guard), the
compare may be converted to a fmax. This patch also handles that case.
All of the affected cases are in DiRT: Showdown.
All Gen7+ platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17225365 -> 17225303 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 40051 -> 39989 (-0.15%)
helped: 62
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1 x̄: 1.00 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.07% max: 0.66% x̄: 0.27% x̃: 0.26%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.00 -1.00
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.31% -0.22%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360842788 -> 360842595 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 1818081 -> 1817888 (-0.01%)
helped: 29
HURT: 22
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 206 x̄: 20.66 x̃: 14
helped stats (rel) min: <.01% max: 9.55% x̄: 0.87% x̃: 0.42%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 108 x̄: 18.45 x̃: 7
HURT stats (rel) min: <.01% max: 4.48% x̄: 0.56% x̃: 0.19%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -14.48 6.91
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.71% 0.21%
Inconclusive result (value mean confidence interval includes 0).
No changes on any other Intel platform.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All Gen7+ platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17228376 -> 17225365 (-0.02%)
instructions in affected programs: 280732 -> 277721 (-1.07%)
helped: 1072
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 12 x̄: 2.81 x̃: 2
helped stats (rel) min: 0.16% max: 5.10% x̄: 1.43% x̃: 1.07%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -2.92 -2.70
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -1.48% -1.37%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360935690 -> 360842788 (-0.03%)
cycles in affected programs: 7838017 -> 7745115 (-1.19%)
helped: 1569
HURT: 69
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 1198 x̄: 63.53 x̃: 20
helped stats (rel) min: 0.06% max: 26.17% x̄: 3.44% x̃: 2.12%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 2820 x̄: 98.22 x̃: 47
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.05% max: 16.67% x̄: 3.50% x̃: 2.31%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -63.55 -49.89
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -3.33% -2.96%
Cycles are helped.
No changes on any other platform.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Without this, adding an algebraic rule like
(('bcsel', ('flt', a, 0.0), 0.0, ...), ...),
will cause assertion failures inside nir_src_comp_as_float in
GTF-GL46.gtf21.GL.lessThan.lessThan_vec3_frag (and related tests) from
the OpenGL CTS and shaders/closed/steam/witcher-2/511.shader_test from
shader-db.
All of these cases have some code that ends up like
('bcsel', ('flt', a, 0.0), 'b@1', ...)
When the 'b@1' is tested, nir_src_comp_as_float fails because there's
no such thing as a 1-bit float.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change also enables a later change (nir/algebraic: Replace
1-fsat(a) with fsat(1-a)) to affect more shaders.
Almost all of the affected shaders are in Bioshock Infinite, and all of
those shaders all require GLSL 4.10.
All Intel platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17228584 -> 17228376 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 31438 -> 31230 (-0.66%)
helped: 105
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 5 x̄: 1.98 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.08% max: 1.53% x̄: 0.73% x̃: 0.70%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -2.20 -1.76
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.80% -0.67%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360936431 -> 360935690 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 420100 -> 419359 (-0.18%)
helped: 71
HURT: 21
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 160 x̄: 19.28 x̃: 10
helped stats (rel) min: <.01% max: 9.78% x̄: 0.95% x̃: 0.48%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 198 x̄: 29.90 x̃: 10
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.05% max: 8.36% x̄: 1.24% x̃: 0.90%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -16.77 0.66
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.85% -0.06%
Inconclusive result (value mean confidence interval includes 0).
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Pushing a unary operation, like fneg, into the operation that generates
its operand allows the fsat to be applied to the inner instruction
instead of on a separate instruction that performs the unary operation.
This changes
fmul ssa_100, ssa_99, ssa_98
fmov.sat ssa_101, -ssa_100
into
fmul.sat ssa_100, -ssa_99, ssa_98
Ice Lake, Skylake, and Broadwell had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17228658 -> 17228584 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 3163 -> 3089 (-2.34%)
helped: 49
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 2 x̄: 1.51 x̃: 2
helped stats (rel) min: 0.58% max: 9.09% x̄: 3.69% x̃: 3.51%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.66 -1.37
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -4.37% -3.00%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360937144 -> 360936431 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 24029 -> 23316 (-2.97%)
helped: 47
HURT: 2
helped stats (abs) min: 4 max: 18 x̄: 15.34 x̃: 16
helped stats (rel) min: 0.69% max: 6.18% x̄: 3.78% x̃: 4.27%
HURT stats (abs) min: 4 max: 4 x̄: 4.00 x̃: 4
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.34% max: 0.67% x̄: 0.50% x̃: 0.50%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -16.05 -13.05
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -4.07% -3.15%
Cycles are helped.
All Gen7 and earlier platforms had similar results. (Haswell shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 13536059 -> 13535884 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 8797 -> 8622 (-1.99%)
helped: 150
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 2 x̄: 1.17 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.40% max: 11.11% x̄: 3.51% x̃: 1.96%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.23 -1.11
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -3.97% -3.05%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 357696119 -> 357694193 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 50216 -> 48290 (-3.84%)
helped: 109
HURT: 14
helped stats (abs) min: 2 max: 92 x̄: 18.97 x̃: 16
helped stats (rel) min: 0.26% max: 19.09% x̄: 7.37% x̃: 5.37%
HURT stats (abs) min: 2 max: 26 x̄: 10.14 x̃: 5
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.18% max: 4.73% x̄: 1.84% x̃: 0.92%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -19.27 -12.05
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -7.34% -5.31%
Cycles are helped.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All Gen6+ GPUs had similar results. (Skylake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 15336712 -> 15336622 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 3952 -> 3862 (-2.28%)
helped: 24
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 3 max: 5 x̄: 3.75 x̃: 4
helped stats (rel) min: 1.75% max: 2.70% x̄: 2.34% x̃: 2.46%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -4.06 -3.44
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -2.47% -2.22%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 355722052 -> 355721235 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 27326 -> 26509 (-2.99%)
helped: 20
HURT: 4
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 227 x̄: 44.75 x̃: 14
helped stats (rel) min: 0.12% max: 22.95% x̄: 3.83% x̃: 1.23%
HURT stats (abs) min: 2 max: 64 x̄: 19.50 x̃: 6
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.21% max: 3.63% x̄: 1.24% x̃: 0.55%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -61.61 -6.47
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -5.59% -0.39%
Cycles are helped.
No changes on Ice Lake, Iron Lake, or GM45.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: Add unit tests. Suggested by Matt.
All Intel GPUs had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17229441 -> 17228658 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 159574 -> 158791 (-0.49%)
helped: 489
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 5 x̄: 1.60 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.07% max: 2.70% x̄: 0.61% x̃: 0.59%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.72 -1.48
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -0.64% -0.58%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360944149 -> 360937144 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 1072195 -> 1065190 (-0.65%)
helped: 254
HURT: 27
helped stats (abs) min: 2 max: 234 x̄: 30.51 x̃: 9
helped stats (rel) min: 0.04% max: 8.99% x̄: 0.75% x̃: 0.24%
HURT stats (abs) min: 2 max: 83 x̄: 27.56 x̃: 24
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.09% max: 3.79% x̄: 1.28% x̃: 1.16%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -30.11 -19.75
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -0.70% -0.41%
Cycles are helped.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]> [v1]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All Gen7+ platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 17229439 -> 17229377 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 9859 -> 9797 (-0.63%)
helped: 41
HURT: 0
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 6 x̄: 1.51 x̃: 1
helped stats (rel) min: 0.08% max: 11.54% x̄: 1.65% x̃: 0.67%
95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: -1.88 -1.14
95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: -2.48% -0.81%
Instructions are helped.
total cycles in shared programs: 360944145 -> 360942989 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 178167 -> 177011 (-0.65%)
helped: 36
HURT: 19
helped stats (abs) min: 1 max: 222 x̄: 38.03 x̃: 5
helped stats (rel) min: 0.01% max: 31.01% x̄: 4.01% x̃: 0.45%
HURT stats (abs) min: 1 max: 34 x̄: 11.21 x̃: 6
HURT stats (rel) min: 0.03% max: 2.74% x̄: 0.72% x̃: 0.50%
95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -36.01 -6.02
95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -4.18% -0.57%
Cycles are helped.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This doesn't make any real difference now, but future work (not in this
series) will add a LOT of ffma patterns. Having to duplicate all of
them for ffma(a, b, c) and ffma(b, a, c) is just terrible.
No shader-db changes on any Intel platform.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: Instead of handling 3 sources as a special case, generalize with
loops to N sources. Suggested by Jason.
v3: Further generalize by only checking that number of sources is >= 2.
Suggested by Jason.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The meaning of the new name is that the first two sources are
commutative. Since this is only currently applied to two-source
operations, there is no change.
A future change will mark ffma as 2src_commutative.
It is also possible that future work will add 3src_commutative for
opcodes like fmin3.
v2: s/commutative_2src/2src_commutative/g. I had originally considered
this, but I discarded it because I did't want to deal with identifiers
that (should) start with 2. Jason suggested it in review, so we decided
that _2src_commutative would be used in nir_opcodes.py. Also add some
comments documenting what 2src_commutative means. Also suggested by
Jason.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of re-building the interference graph every time we spill, we
modify it in place so we can avoid recalculating liveness and the whole
O(n^2) interference graph building process. We make a simplifying
assumption in order to do so which is that all spill/fill temporary
registers live for the entire duration of the instruction around which
we're spilling. This isn't quite true because a spill into the source
of an instruction doesn't need to interfere with its destination, for
instance. Not re-calculating liveness also means that we aren't
adjusting spill costs based on the new liveness. The combination of
these things results in a bit of churn in spilling. It takes a large
cut out of the run-time of shader-db on my laptop.
Shader-db results on Kaby Lake:
total instructions in shared programs: 15311224 -> 15311360 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 77027 -> 77163 (0.18%)
helped: 11
HURT: 18
total cycles in shared programs: 355544739 -> 355830749 (0.08%)
cycles in affected programs: 203273745 -> 203559755 (0.14%)
helped: 234
HURT: 190
total spills in shared programs: 12049 -> 12042 (-0.06%)
spills in affected programs: 2465 -> 2458 (-0.28%)
helped: 9
HURT: 16
total fills in shared programs: 25112 -> 25165 (0.21%)
fills in affected programs: 6819 -> 6872 (0.78%)
helped: 11
HURT: 16
Total CPU time (seconds): 2469.68 -> 2360.22 (-4.43%)
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is slightly less convenient in some places but it will make it much
easier when we want to start adding nodes dynamically.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The old code was arranged by the type of interference being added. It
would set up payload registers and then add payload interference for all
VGRFs. It would set up MRFs and add MRF interference for all VGRFs.
This commit re-arranges things to be organized differently. It first
creates and sets up all RA nodes and then groups interference into two
new categories: live range and instruction interference. Once all the
RA nodes have been set up, it walks the list of VGRFs and sets up their
live range interference and then walks the list of instructions and sets
up instruction interference. This new arrangement will be advantageous
for a future patch but, at the moment, it cuts 2% off the run-time of
shader-db on my laptop.
Shader-db results on Kaby Lake:
total instructions in shared programs: 15311224 -> 15311224 (0.00%)
instructions in affected programs: 0 -> 0
helped: 0
HURT: 0
total cycles in shared programs: 355544739 -> 355544739 (0.00%)
cycles in affected programs: 0 -> 0
helped: 0
HURT: 0
Total CPU time (seconds): 2523.45 -> 2469.68 (-2.13%)
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only use of the MRF hack these days is for spilling and there we
don't need the precise MRF usage information. If we're spilling then we
know pretty well how many MRFs are going to be used. It is possible if
the only things that are spilled have fewer SIMD channels than the
dispatch width of the shader that this may be more MRFs than needed.
That's a risk we're willing to takd.
Shader-db results on Kaby Lake:
total instructions in shared programs: 15311100 -> 15311224 (<.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 16664 -> 16788 (0.74%)
helped: 1
HURT: 5
total cycles in shared programs: 355543197 -> 355544739 (<.01%)
cycles in affected programs: 731864 -> 733406 (0.21%)
helped: 3
HURT: 6
The hurt shaders are all SIMD32 compute shaders where we reserve enough
space for a 32-wide spill/fill but don't need it.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This accomplishes two things. First, it makes interfaces which are
really private to RA private to RA. Second, it gives us a place to
store some common stuff as we go through the algorithm.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's the main function from which all the other functions are called.
It belongs at the bottom.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's no reason why we need to use the calculated payload_node_count
value which is just first_non_payload_grf aligned up. The grf_used
value will be aligned up to 16 anyway (which is a much bigger alignment)
before being handed off to hardware.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We only have one node per VGRF so this was adding way too much
interference. No idea how we didn't catch this before.
Shader-db results on Kaby Lake:
total instructions in shared programs: 15311100 -> 15311100 (0.00%)
instructions in affected programs: 0 -> 0
helped: 0
HURT: 0
total cycles in shared programs: 355468050 -> 355543197 (0.02%)
cycles in affected programs: 2472492 -> 2547639 (3.04%)
helped: 17
HURT: 20
Fixes: 014edff0d20d "intel/fs: Add interference between SENDS sources"
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: 83dedb6354d "i965: Add src/dst interference for certain"
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We want to be able to call ra_allocate() and, when it fails, mutate the
graph and try again rather than re-building the graph from scratch.
This commit moves all the scratch bits except the final register
allocation (which is really an out value not scratch) into sub-structs
named "tmp" to make it clear which things are scratch. It also adds
bits to the ra_select() initialization loop to initialize things (since
we can't trust rzalloc anymore) and copy q_test and forced_reg over.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unfortunately, we can't quite follow the standard C conventions for
these because ralloc doesn't know the sizes of pointers.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the last phase of the schedule and RA loop, the RA call is redundant
if we spill. Immediately afterwards, we're going to see that we
couldn't allocate without spilling and call back into RA and tell it to
go ahead and spill. We've known about it for a while but we've always
brushed over it on the theory that, if you're going to spill, you'll be
calling RA a bunch anyway and what does one extra RA hurt? As it turns
out, it hurts more than you'd expect. Because the RA interference graph
gets sparser with each spill and the RA algorithm is more efficient on
sparser graphs, the RA call that we're duplicating is actually the most
expensive call in the RA-and-spill loop.
There's another extra RA call we do that's a bit harder to see which
this also removes. If we try to compile a shader that isn't the minimum
dispatch width and it fails to allocate without spilling we call fail()
to set an error but then go ahead and do the first spilling RA pass and
only after that's complete do we detect the fail and bail out. By
making minimum dispatch widths part of the spill condition, we side-step
this problem.
Getting rid of these extra spills takes the compile time of a nasty
Aztec Ruins shader from about 28 seconds to about 26 seconds on my
laptop. It also makes shader-db 1.5% faster
Shader-db results on Kaby Lake:
total instructions in shared programs: 15311100 -> 15311100 (0.00%)
instructions in affected programs: 0 -> 0
helped: 0
HURT: 0
total cycles in shared programs: 355468050 -> 355468050 (0.00%)
cycles in affected programs: 0 -> 0
helped: 0
HURT: 0
Total CPU time (seconds): 2524.31 -> 2486.63 (-1.49%)
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The most expensive part of register allocation is the ra_simplify step
which is a fixed-point algorithm with a worst-case complexity of O(n^2)
which adds the registers to a stack which we then use later to do the
actual allocation. This commit uses bit sets and changes the core loop
of ra_simplify to first walk 32-node chunks and then walk each chunk.
This lets us skip whole 32-node chunks in one go based on bit operations
and compute the minimum q value potentially 32x as fast. Of course, the
algorithm still has the same fundamental O(n^2) run-time but the
constant is now much lower.
In the nasty Aztec Ruins compute shader, this shaves a full four seconds
off the 30s compile time for a release build of mesa. In a debug build
(needed for accurate stack traces), perf says that ra_select takes 20%
of runtime before this patch and only 5-6% of runtime after this patch.
It also makes shader-db runs faster.
Shader-db results on Kaby Lake:
total instructions in shared programs: 15311100 -> 15311100 (0.00%)
instructions in affected programs: 0 -> 0
helped: 0
HURT: 0
total cycles in shared programs: 355468050 -> 355468050 (0.00%)
cycles in affected programs: 0 -> 0
helped: 0
HURT: 0
Total CPU time (seconds): 2602.37 -> 2524.31 (-3.00%)
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We only use q_total if the reg is not assigned so there's no point in
updating it if the reg is not assigned. This has no known perf benefit
but it will reduce churn in a future commit.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This shaves about half a second off the 30 second compile time of one of
the compute shaders in Aztec ruins.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
|