| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When used with a cube array in VS, failed assertion in ir_validate:
Assignment count of LHS write mask channels enabled not
matching RHS vector size (3 LHS, 4 RHS).
To fix this, swizzle the RHS correctly for the writemask.
This showed up in the ARB_texture_gather tests, which exercise cube
arrays in the VS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <[email protected]>
Cc: "9.2" <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Consider only the top-left and top-right pixels to approximate DDX in a 2x2
subspan, unless the application requests a more accurate approximation via
GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER_DERIVATIVE_HINT or this optimization is disabled from the
new driconf option disable_derivative_optimization.
This results in a less accurate approximation. However, it improves the
performance of Xonotic with Ultra settings by 24.3879% +/- 0.832202% (at 95.0%
confidence) on Haswell. No noticeable image quality difference observed.
The improvement comes from faster sample_d. It seems, on Haswell, some
optimizations are introduced to allow faster sample_d when all pixels in a
subspan have the same derivative. I considered SAMPLE_STATE too, which allows
one to control the quality of sample_d on Haswell. But it gave much worse
image quality without giving better performance comparing to this change.
No piglit quick.tests regression on Haswell (tested with v1).
v2: better guess for precompile program key
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chris Forbes <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We have the destination framebuffer object passed in; there's no need to
go digging around in the context.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using it encourages the (IMHO worrying) practice of leaving member
variables uninitialized in constructor definitions. This macro
shouldn't be necessary anymore after the last patch series fixing all
its users to initialize all member variables from the class
constructor. Remove it.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of glsl_to_tgsi_instruction are already being
initialized from its implicitly defined constructor, it's not
necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of ir_to_mesa_instruction are already being
initialized from its implicitly defined constructor, it's not
necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of vec4_live_variables are already being
initialized from its constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to
allocate its memory, and doing so makes it more likely that we will
start relying on the allocator to zero out all memory if the class is
ever extended with new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of fs_live_variables are already being
initialized from its constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to
allocate its memory, and doing so makes it more likely that we will
start relying on the allocator to zero out all memory if the class is
ever extended with new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of fs_inst are already being initialized from its
constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory,
and doing so makes it more likely that we will start relying on the
allocator to zero out all memory if the class is ever extended with
new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of ip_record are already being initialized from
its constructor, it's not necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its
memory, and doing so makes it more likely that we will start relying
on the allocator to zero out all memory if the class is ever extended
with new member variables.
That's bad because it ties objects to some specific allocation scheme,
and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with a
different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The cfg_t object relies on the memory allocator zeroing out its
contents before it's initialized, which is quite an unusual practice
in the C++ world because it ties objects to some specific allocation
scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with
a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields from the
constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The bblock_t object relies on the memory allocator zeroing out its
contents before it's initialized, which is quite an unusual practice
in the C++ world because it ties objects to some specific allocation
scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with
a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields from the
constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
v2: Use zero initialization for numeric types instead of default construction.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of ast_type_qualifier are already being
initialized from its implicitly defined constructor, it's not
necessary to use rzalloc to allocate its memory.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All member variables of ast_node are already being initialized from
its constructor, but some of its derived classes were leaving members
uninitialized -- Fix them.
Using rzalloc makes it more likely that we will start relying on the
allocator to zero out all memory if the class is ever extended with
new member variables. That's bad because it ties objects to some
specific allocation scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an
object is created with a different allocator -- Stack allocation,
array allocation, or aggregation inside a different object are some of
the useful possibilities that come to my mind.
v2: Use NULL initialization instead of default construction for pointers.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The vec4_instruction object relies on the memory allocator zeroing out
its contents before it's initialized, which is quite an unusual
practice in the C++ world because it ties objects to some specific
allocation scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is
created with a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array
allocation, or aggregation inside a different object are some of the
useful possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields from
the constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The _mesa_glsl_parse_state object relies on the memory allocator
zeroing out its contents before it's initialized, which is quite an
unusual practice in the C++ world because it ties objects to some
specific allocation scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an
object is created with a different allocator -- Stack allocation,
array allocation, or aggregation inside a different object are some of
the useful possibilities that come to my mind. Initialize all fields
from the constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Several C++ source files include "main/uniforms.h" from an extern "C"
block, which is both unnecessary, because "uniforms.h" already checks
for a C++ compiler and sets the right linkage, and incorrect, because
the header file includes other C++ headers ("glsl_types.h" and
"ir_uniform.h") that are supposed to get C++ linkage.
Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes regression on r600g due to fast clear introduced by commit
edbbfac6.
Signed-off-by: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In commit 247f90c77e8f3894e963d796628246ba0bde27b5 (i965/gs: Set
control data header size/format appropriately for EndPrimitive()), I
incorrectly numbered the DWORDs in the 3DSTATE_GS command starting
from 1 instead of starting from 0. This caused the control data
format to be programmed into the wrong DWORD, resulting in corruption
in some geometry shaders that used an output type of points.
This patch numbers the DWORDs starting from 0, as we do for all other
commands, which causes the control data format to be programmed into
the correct DWORD.
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The spec doesn't say GL_INVALID_VALUE should be raised for bufSize <= 0.
In any case, memcpy(len < 0) will lead to a crash, so don't allow it.
CC: "9.2" <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Return bool instead of int. Const-qualify the syncObj. Add some comments.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Error checking bufSize isn't mentioned in the spec, but it is in the
man pages. However, I believe the man page is incorrect. Typically,
GL functions that take GLsizei parameters check that they're positive
or non-negative. Negative values don't make sense here.
A spec bug has been filed with Khronos/ARB.
v2: check for negative values, not <= 0.
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This incorporates Vinson's change to check for a null src pointer as
detected by coverity.
Also, rename the function params to be src/dst, const-qualify src,
and use GL types to match the calling functions. And add some more
comments.
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes build errors.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move glx/{,xlib/}Makefile.am to preserve file list
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <[email protected]>
|