summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/mesa/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa/drivers')
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp73
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h7
2 files changed, 76 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp
index ca5b01cd03d..b8e5e2edba3 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ link(void *mem_ctx, bblock_t *block)
}
bblock_t::bblock_t(cfg_t *cfg) :
- cfg(cfg), start_ip(0), end_ip(0), num(0)
+ cfg(cfg), idom(NULL), start_ip(0), end_ip(0), num(0)
{
instructions.make_empty();
parents.make_empty();
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ cfg_t::cfg_t(exec_list *instructions)
block_list.make_empty();
blocks = NULL;
num_blocks = 0;
+ idom_dirty = true;
bblock_t *cur = NULL;
int ip = 0;
@@ -373,6 +374,7 @@ cfg_t::remove_block(bblock_t *block)
this->blocks[this->num_blocks - 1]->num = this->num_blocks - 2;
this->num_blocks--;
+ idom_dirty = true;
}
bblock_t *
@@ -409,10 +411,13 @@ cfg_t::make_block_array()
}
void
-cfg_t::dump(backend_visitor *v) const
+cfg_t::dump(backend_visitor *v)
{
+ if (idom_dirty)
+ calculate_idom();
+
foreach_block (block, this) {
- fprintf(stderr, "START B%d", block->num);
+ fprintf(stderr, "START B%d IDOM(B%d)", block->num, block->idom->num);
foreach_list_typed(bblock_link, link, link, &block->parents) {
fprintf(stderr, " <-B%d",
link->block->num);
@@ -428,3 +433,65 @@ cfg_t::dump(backend_visitor *v) const
fprintf(stderr, "\n");
}
}
+
+/* Calculates the immediate dominator of each block, according to "A Simple,
+ * Fast Dominance Algorithm" by Keith D. Cooper, Timothy J. Harvey, and Ken
+ * Kennedy.
+ *
+ * The authors claim that for control flow graphs of sizes normally encountered
+ * (less than 1000 nodes) that this algorithm is significantly faster than
+ * others like Lengauer-Tarjan.
+ */
+void
+cfg_t::calculate_idom()
+{
+ foreach_block(block, this) {
+ block->idom = NULL;
+ }
+ blocks[0]->idom = blocks[0];
+
+ bool changed;
+ do {
+ changed = false;
+
+ foreach_block(block, this) {
+ if (block->num == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ bblock_t *new_idom = NULL;
+ foreach_list_typed(bblock_link, parent, link, &block->parents) {
+ if (parent->block->idom) {
+ if (new_idom == NULL) {
+ new_idom = parent->block;
+ } else if (parent->block->idom != NULL) {
+ new_idom = intersect(parent->block, new_idom);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (block->idom != new_idom) {
+ block->idom = new_idom;
+ changed = true;
+ }
+ }
+ } while (changed);
+
+ idom_dirty = false;
+}
+
+bblock_t *
+cfg_t::intersect(bblock_t *b1, bblock_t *b2)
+{
+ /* Note, the comparisons here are the opposite of what the paper says
+ * because we index blocks from beginning -> end (i.e. reverse post-order)
+ * instead of post-order like they assume.
+ */
+ while (b1->num != b2->num) {
+ while (b1->num > b2->num)
+ b1 = b1->idom;
+ while (b2->num > b1->num)
+ b2 = b2->idom;
+ }
+ assert(b1);
+ return b1;
+}
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h
index 0b60fec9825..215f2487e41 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct bblock_t {
struct exec_node link;
struct cfg_t *cfg;
+ struct bblock_t *idom;
int start_ip;
int end_ip;
@@ -269,8 +270,10 @@ struct cfg_t {
bblock_t *new_block();
void set_next_block(bblock_t **cur, bblock_t *block, int ip);
void make_block_array();
+ void calculate_idom();
+ static bblock_t *intersect(bblock_t *b1, bblock_t *b2);
- void dump(backend_visitor *v) const;
+ void dump(backend_visitor *v);
#endif
void *mem_ctx;
@@ -278,6 +281,8 @@ struct cfg_t {
struct exec_list block_list;
struct bblock_t **blocks;
int num_blocks;
+
+ bool idom_dirty;
};
/* Note that this is implemented with a double for loop -- break will