summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_blorp.cpp17
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_depth_state.c33
2 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_blorp.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_blorp.cpp
index 1cab8b71ff0..f75624cb0c3 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_blorp.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_blorp.cpp
@@ -780,6 +780,23 @@ gen6_blorp_emit_depth_stencil_config(struct brw_context *brw,
uint32_t draw_x = params->depth.x_offset;
uint32_t draw_y = params->depth.y_offset;
uint32_t tile_mask_x, tile_mask_y;
+ uint32_t surftype;
+ GLenum gl_target = params->depth.mt->target;
+
+ switch (gl_target) {
+ case GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_ARRAY:
+ case GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP:
+ /* The PRM claims that we should use BRW_SURFACE_CUBE for this
+ * situation, but experiments show that gl_Layer doesn't work when we do
+ * this. So we use BRW_SURFACE_2D, since for rendering purposes this is
+ * equivalent.
+ */
+ surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;
+ break;
+ default:
+ surftype = translate_tex_target(gl_target);
+ break;
+ }
brw_get_depthstencil_tile_masks(params->depth.mt,
params->depth.level,
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_depth_state.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_depth_state.c
index 5c600b72807..90b718c9452 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_depth_state.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_depth_state.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include "brw_state.h"
#include "brw_defines.h"
+#include "main/mtypes.h"
#include "main/fbobject.h"
#include "main/glformats.h"
@@ -43,6 +44,13 @@ gen6_emit_depth_stencil_hiz(struct brw_context *brw,
uint32_t width, uint32_t height,
uint32_t tile_x, uint32_t tile_y)
{
+ struct gl_context *ctx = &brw->ctx;
+ struct gl_framebuffer *fb = ctx->DrawBuffer;
+ uint32_t surftype;
+ GLenum gl_target = GL_TEXTURE_2D;
+ const struct intel_renderbuffer *irb = NULL;
+ const struct gl_renderbuffer *rb = NULL;
+
/* Enable the hiz bit if we're doing separate stencil, because it and the
* separate stencil bit must have the same value. From Section 2.11.5.6.1.1
* 3DSTATE_DEPTH_BUFFER, Bit 1.21 "Separate Stencil Enable":
@@ -61,6 +69,31 @@ gen6_emit_depth_stencil_hiz(struct brw_context *brw,
intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(brw);
intel_emit_depth_stall_flushes(brw);
+ irb = intel_get_renderbuffer(fb, BUFFER_DEPTH);
+ if (!irb)
+ irb = intel_get_renderbuffer(fb, BUFFER_STENCIL);
+ rb = (struct gl_renderbuffer*) irb;
+
+ if (rb) {
+ if (rb->TexImage)
+ gl_target = rb->TexImage->TexObject->Target;
+ }
+
+ switch (gl_target) {
+ case GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_ARRAY:
+ case GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP:
+ /* The PRM claims that we should use BRW_SURFACE_CUBE for this
+ * situation, but experiments show that gl_Layer doesn't work when we do
+ * this. So we use BRW_SURFACE_2D, since for rendering purposes this is
+ * equivalent.
+ */
+ surftype = BRW_SURFACE_2D;
+ break;
+ default:
+ surftype = translate_tex_target(gl_target);
+ break;
+ }
+
BEGIN_BATCH(7);
OUT_BATCH(_3DSTATE_DEPTH_BUFFER << 16 | (7 - 2));
OUT_BATCH((depth_mt ? depth_mt->pitch - 1 : 0) |