diff options
author | Ian Romanick <[email protected]> | 2019-08-07 08:54:04 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ian Romanick <[email protected]> | 2019-08-29 13:15:52 -0700 |
commit | ccb236d1bc6375bdf9bc47550bdfa348ea7369b9 (patch) | |
tree | 807311d6723461b3e0ced2e6e56b08aa4291e59e /src | |
parent | 30b9ed92ea423a4857023ca5e2222ae409672fa5 (diff) |
nir/algebraic: Mark some value range analysis-based optimizations imprecise
This didn't fix bug #111308, but it was found will trying to find the
actual cause of that bug.
Fixes piglit tests (new in piglit!110):
- fs-fract-of-NaN.shader_test
- fs-lt-nan-tautology.shader_test
- fs-ge-nan-tautology.shader_test
No shader-db changes on any Intel platform.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111308
Fixes: b77070e293c ("nir/algebraic: Use value range analysis to eliminate tautological compares")
Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r-- | src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py | 22 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py index 6f0a4393524..3fc35995bca 100644 --- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py +++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_opt_algebraic.py @@ -807,7 +807,8 @@ optimizations.extend([ (('ffloor', 'a(is_integral)'), a), (('fceil', 'a(is_integral)'), a), (('ftrunc', 'a(is_integral)'), a), - (('ffract', 'a(is_integral)'), 0.0), + # fract(x) = x - floor(x), so fract(NaN) = NaN + (('~ffract', 'a(is_integral)'), 0.0), (('fabs', 'a(is_not_negative)'), a), (('iabs', 'a(is_not_negative)'), a), (('fsat', 'a(is_not_positive)'), 0.0), @@ -837,15 +838,18 @@ optimizations.extend([ (('fne', 'a(is_not_zero)', 0.0), True), (('feq', 'a(is_not_zero)', 0.0), False), - (('fge', 'a(is_not_negative)', 'b(is_not_positive)'), True), - (('fge', 'b(is_not_positive)', 'a(is_gt_zero)'), False), - (('fge', 'a(is_lt_zero)', 'b(is_not_negative)'), False), - (('fge', 'b(is_not_negative)', 'a(is_not_positive)'), True), + # The results expecting true, must be marked imprecise. The results + # expecting false are fine because NaN compared >= or < anything is false. - (('flt', 'a(is_not_negative)', 'b(is_not_positive)'), False), - (('flt', 'b(is_not_positive)', 'a(is_gt_zero)'), True), - (('flt', 'a(is_lt_zero)', 'b(is_not_negative)'), True), - (('flt', 'b(is_not_negative)', 'a(is_not_positive)'), False), + (('~fge', 'a(is_not_negative)', 'b(is_not_positive)'), True), + (('fge', 'b(is_not_positive)', 'a(is_gt_zero)'), False), + (('fge', 'a(is_lt_zero)', 'b(is_not_negative)'), False), + (('~fge', 'b(is_not_negative)', 'a(is_not_positive)'), True), + + (('flt', 'a(is_not_negative)', 'b(is_not_positive)'), False), + (('~flt', 'b(is_not_positive)', 'a(is_gt_zero)'), True), + (('~flt', 'a(is_lt_zero)', 'b(is_not_negative)'), True), + (('flt', 'b(is_not_negative)', 'a(is_not_positive)'), False), (('ine', 'a(is_not_zero)', 0), True), (('ieq', 'a(is_not_zero)', 0), False), |