summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/mesa
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKenneth Graunke <[email protected]>2014-03-13 02:28:14 -0700
committerKenneth Graunke <[email protected]>2014-04-08 13:09:46 -0700
commitec1baea95a4a654de5c80089b01e0e8f38f7129a (patch)
tree76fe9bea63c8949c326afc353bb842bb7d63a357 /src/mesa
parentee839cc6ef92d37ec6a44e6036e7a2c46172a16a (diff)
i965: Delete "fast color clear unsupported" performance warning.
Applications frequently clear to colors other than 0.0 or 1.0, which prevents us from doing fast color clears. In that case, we issue this performance warning on basically every glClear call, resulting in so much spam that it's nearly impossible to see any other messages. Plus, I don't think it's useful. We aren't suggesting a better way to do what the application developers want---we're just telling them it would be faster to do something they don't want. Driver developers have no control over the clear color, so this message is totally useless to them. A better alternative to get this sort of information is to use INTEL_DEBUG=blorp, which tells you whether color clears were fast, simd16 repdata, or slow. v2: Rebase on has_color_component changes. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa')
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_clear.cpp2
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_clear.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_clear.cpp
index d16da97c3c0..d8aa53c854c 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_clear.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp_clear.cpp
@@ -155,8 +155,6 @@ is_color_fast_clear_compatible(struct brw_context *brw,
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
if (color->f[i] != 0.0 && color->f[i] != 1.0 &&
_mesa_format_has_color_component(format, i)) {
- perf_debug("Clear color unsupported by fast color clear. "
- "Falling back to slow clear.\n");
return false;
}
}