diff options
author | Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> | 2016-04-21 20:14:58 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> | 2016-04-21 20:14:58 -0700 |
commit | 6a0d036483caf87d43ebe2edd1905873446c9589 (patch) | |
tree | 7ff5af3ac27d8cb5c07893a3fc6bc1d1773b8c79 /src/mesa | |
parent | c3b88cc2c15f19e748c9c406e9ab053975adab7e (diff) |
i965: Always use Y-tiled buffers on SKL+
Starting with Skylake, the display engine is capable of scanning out from
Y-tiled buffers. As such, we can and should use Y-tiling for better efficiency.
This also has the added benefit of being able to fast clear the winsys buffer.
Note that the buffer allocation done for mipmaps will already never allocate an
X-tiled buffer for GEN9.
This has an almost universal positive impact on benchmarks, some improving by as
much as 20%.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Topi Pohjolainen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa')
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_meta_fast_clear.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c | 21 |
4 files changed, 30 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_meta_fast_clear.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_meta_fast_clear.c index 76988bfda7b..7760cce687b 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_meta_fast_clear.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_meta_fast_clear.c @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ brw_get_fast_clear_rect(const struct brw_context *brw, * alignment size returned by intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(), but * with X alignment multiplied by 16 and Y alignment multiplied by 32. */ - intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(mt, &x_align, &y_align); + intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(brw, mt, &x_align, &y_align); x_align *= 16; /* SKL+ line alignment requirement for Y-tiled are half those of the prior @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ brw_get_resolve_rect(const struct brw_context *brw, * by a factor of 2. */ - intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(mt, &x_align, &y_align); + intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(brw, mt, &x_align, &y_align); if (brw->gen >= 9) { x_scaledown = x_align * 8; y_scaledown = y_align * 8; diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c index 26c297da176..8099ea717bb 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c @@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ compute_msaa_layout(struct brw_context *brw, mesa_format format, * by half the block width, and Y coordinates by half the block height. */ void -intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(const struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt, +intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(const struct brw_context *brw, + const struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt, unsigned *width_px, unsigned *height) { switch (mt->tiling) { @@ -156,6 +157,11 @@ intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(const struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt, *height = 4; break; case I915_TILING_X: + /* The docs are somewhat confusing with the way the tables are displayed. + * However, it does clearly state: "MCS and Lossless compression is + * supported for TiledY/TileYs/TileYf non-MSRTs only." + */ + assert(brw->gen < 9); *width_px = 64 / mt->cpp; *height = 2; } @@ -1552,7 +1558,7 @@ intel_miptree_alloc_non_msrt_mcs(struct brw_context *brw, const mesa_format format = MESA_FORMAT_R_UINT32; unsigned block_width_px; unsigned block_height; - intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(mt, &block_width_px, &block_height); + intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(brw, mt, &block_width_px, &block_height); unsigned width_divisor = block_width_px * 4; unsigned height_divisor = block_height * 8; diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h index 7862152cd97..21e4718513b 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h @@ -663,7 +663,8 @@ struct intel_mipmap_tree }; void -intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(const struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt, +intel_get_non_msrt_mcs_alignment(const struct brw_context *brw, + const struct intel_mipmap_tree *mt, unsigned *width_px, unsigned *height); bool diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c index db9d94d3b34..878901ac1f9 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c @@ -516,7 +516,11 @@ intel_create_image(__DRIscreen *screen, int cpp; unsigned long pitch; - tiling = I915_TILING_X; + if (intelScreen->devinfo->gen >= 9) { + tiling = I915_TILING_Y; + } else { + tiling = I915_TILING_X; + } if (use & __DRI_IMAGE_USE_CURSOR) { if (width != 64 || height != 64) return NULL; @@ -1144,8 +1148,14 @@ intel_detect_swizzling(struct intel_screen *screen) drm_intel_bo *buffer; unsigned long flags = 0; unsigned long aligned_pitch; - uint32_t tiling = I915_TILING_X; uint32_t swizzle_mode = 0; + uint32_t tiling; + + if (screen->devinfo->gen >= 9) { + tiling = I915_TILING_Y; + } else { + tiling = I915_TILING_X; + } buffer = drm_intel_bo_alloc_tiled(screen->bufmgr, "swizzle test", 64, 64, 4, @@ -1571,7 +1581,12 @@ intelAllocateBuffer(__DRIscreen *screen, return NULL; /* The front and back buffers are color buffers, which are X tiled. */ - uint32_t tiling = I915_TILING_X; + uint32_t tiling; + if (intelScreen->devinfo->gen >= 9) { + tiling = I915_TILING_Y; + } else { + tiling = I915_TILING_X; + } unsigned long pitch; int cpp = format / 8; intelBuffer->bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc_tiled(intelScreen->bufmgr, |