diff options
author | Matt Turner <[email protected]> | 2016-02-15 10:05:33 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matt Turner <[email protected]> | 2016-03-30 19:54:30 -0700 |
commit | 7b208a731277b4b99b86af3df98c1219099036d7 (patch) | |
tree | f5b3fc8a4fe65e3e7b36cfba605716cfbd5a6e16 /src/mesa | |
parent | f60750968c66f7aa15181c4ba315bb594e615044 (diff) |
i965: Relax restriction on scheduling last instruction.
I think when this code was written, basic blocks were always ended by a
control flow instruction or an end-of-thread message. That's no longer
the case, and removing this restriction actually helps things:
instructions in affected programs: 7267 -> 7244 (-0.32%)
helped: 4
total cycles in shared programs: 66559580 -> 66431900 (-0.19%)
cycles in affected programs: 28310152 -> 28182472 (-0.45%)
helped: 9577
HURT: 879
GAINED: 2
The addition of the is_control_flow() checks is not a functional change,
since the add_insts_from_block() does not put them in the list of
instructions to schedule. I plan to change this in a later patch.
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa')
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp | 23 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp index 66eb07e6d1a..46b45a5ea01 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp @@ -923,15 +923,6 @@ fs_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps() */ schedule_node *last_fixed_grf_write = NULL; - /* The last instruction always needs to still be the last - * instruction. Either it's flow control (IF, ELSE, ENDIF, DO, - * WHILE) and scheduling other things after it would disturb the - * basic block, or it's FB_WRITE and we should do a better job at - * dead code elimination anyway. - */ - schedule_node *last = (schedule_node *)instructions.get_tail(); - add_barrier_deps(last); - memset(last_grf_write, 0, sizeof(last_grf_write)); memset(last_mrf_write, 0, sizeof(last_mrf_write)); @@ -940,7 +931,8 @@ fs_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps() fs_inst *inst = (fs_inst *)n->inst; if (inst->opcode == FS_OPCODE_PLACEHOLDER_HALT || - inst->has_side_effects()) + inst->is_control_flow() || + inst->has_side_effects()) add_barrier_deps(n); /* read-after-write deps. */ @@ -1166,15 +1158,6 @@ vec4_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps() */ schedule_node *last_fixed_grf_write = NULL; - /* The last instruction always needs to still be the last instruction. - * Either it's flow control (IF, ELSE, ENDIF, DO, WHILE) and scheduling - * other things after it would disturb the basic block, or it's the EOT - * URB_WRITE and we should do a better job at dead code eliminating - * anything that could have been scheduled after it. - */ - schedule_node *last = (schedule_node *)instructions.get_tail(); - add_barrier_deps(last); - memset(last_grf_write, 0, sizeof(last_grf_write)); memset(last_mrf_write, 0, sizeof(last_mrf_write)); @@ -1182,7 +1165,7 @@ vec4_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps() foreach_in_list(schedule_node, n, &instructions) { vec4_instruction *inst = (vec4_instruction *)n->inst; - if (inst->has_side_effects()) + if (inst->is_control_flow() || inst->has_side_effects()) add_barrier_deps(n); /* read-after-write deps. */ |