summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/mesa
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2018-08-28 15:25:23 -0500
committerJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2018-08-30 11:41:50 -0500
commitd9cf4308ceea3762c1aab48f9c48e12a72162b5a (patch)
tree959f5381a8ea710457ed2d46c42118f481a05d49 /src/mesa
parent8c1b9882b2e0cde0b1ad9c6844fd5939d3bd4b24 (diff)
i965/screen: Allow modifiers on sRGB formats
This effectively reverts a26693493570a9d0f0fba1be617e01ee7bfff4db which was a misguided attempt at protecting intel_query_dma_buf_modifiers from invalid formats. Unfortunately, in some internal EGL cases, we can get an SRGB format validly in this function. Rejecting such formats caused us to not allow CCS in some cases where we should have been allowing it. This regressed the performance of some SynMark tests as well as GfxBench ALU2, Tessellation and Manhattan 3.0 tests There's some question of whether or not we really should be using SRGB "fourcc" formats that aren't actually in drm_foucc.h but there's not much harm in allowing them through here. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107223 Fixes: a26693493570 "i965/screen: Return false for unsupported..." Tested-By: Eero Tamminen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa')
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c14
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
index eaf5a3b9feb..e9de184cca6 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_screen.c
@@ -1274,9 +1274,9 @@ static bool
intel_image_format_is_supported(const struct gen_device_info *devinfo,
const struct intel_image_format *fmt)
{
- if (fmt->fourcc == __DRI_IMAGE_FOURCC_SARGB8888 ||
- fmt->fourcc == __DRI_IMAGE_FOURCC_SABGR8888)
- return false;
+ /* Currently, all formats with an intel_image_format are available on all
+ * platforms so there's really nothing to check there.
+ */
#ifndef NDEBUG
if (fmt->nplanes == 1) {
@@ -1302,6 +1302,14 @@ intel_query_dma_buf_formats(__DRIscreen *_screen, int max,
int num_formats = 0, i;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intel_image_formats); i++) {
+ /* These two formats are valid DRI formats but do not exist in
+ * drm_fourcc.h in the Linux kernel. We don't want to accidentally
+ * advertise them through the EGL layer.
+ */
+ if (intel_image_formats[i].fourcc == __DRI_IMAGE_FOURCC_SARGB8888 ||
+ intel_image_formats[i].fourcc == __DRI_IMAGE_FOURCC_SABGR8888)
+ continue;
+
if (!intel_image_format_is_supported(&screen->devinfo,
&intel_image_formats[i]))
continue;