i965, mesa: Use the new DECLARE_R[Z]ALLOC_CXX_OPERATORS macros.

These classes declared a placement new operator, but didn't declare a
delete operator.  Switching to the macro gives them a delete operator,
which probably is a good idea anyway.

This also eliminates a lot of boilerplate.

v2: Properly use RZALLOC in Mesa IR/TGSI translators.  Caught by Eric
    and Chad.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chad Versace <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp b/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp
index cef32dc0712..c46a3d00541 100644
--- a/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp
@@ -149,17 +149,7 @@ dst_reg::dst_reg(src_reg reg)
 
 class ir_to_mesa_instruction : public exec_node {
 public:
-   /* Callers of this ralloc-based new need not call delete. It's
-    * easier to just ralloc_free 'ctx' (or any of its ancestors). */
-   static void* operator new(size_t size, void *ctx)
-   {
-      void *node;
-
-      node = rzalloc_size(ctx, size);
-      assert(node != NULL);
-
-      return node;
-   }
+   DECLARE_RZALLOC_CXX_OPERATORS(ir_to_mesa_instruction)
 
    enum prog_opcode op;
    dst_reg dst;