diff options
author | Eric Anholt <[email protected]> | 2010-09-22 11:47:03 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric Anholt <[email protected]> | 2010-09-22 13:09:51 -0700 |
commit | b39e6f33b60ef9bbaf81f320aaca6a440d8a6a8f (patch) | |
tree | c3547819e402b729d84a4847aed95b81ec09fdbf /src/mesa/program | |
parent | 38da5c9cb636387539daaf5688c2a3badee32447 (diff) |
glsl: Rework assignments with write_masks to have LHS chan count match RHS.
It turns out that most people new to this IR are surprised when an
assignment to (say) 3 components on the LHS takes 4 components on the
RHS. It also makes for quite strange IR output:
(assign (constant bool (1)) (x) (var_ref color) (swiz x (var_ref v) ))
(assign (constant bool (1)) (y) (var_ref color) (swiz yy (var_ref v) ))
(assign (constant bool (1)) (z) (var_ref color) (swiz zzz (var_ref v) ))
But even worse, even we get it wrong, as shown by this line of our
current step(float, vec4):
(assign (constant bool (1)) (w)
(var_ref t)
(expression float b2f (expression bool >=
(swiz w (var_ref x))(var_ref edge))))
where we try to assign a float to the writemasked-out x channel and
don't supply anything for the actual w channel we're writing. Drivers
right now just get lucky since ir_to_mesa spams the float value across
all the source channels of a vec4.
Instead, the RHS will now have a number of components equal to the
number of components actually being written. Hopefully this confuses
everyone less, and it also makes codegen for a scalar target simpler.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa/program')
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp | 28 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp b/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp index f24dce79f65..de0cb1ac5bd 100644 --- a/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp +++ b/src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp @@ -1577,13 +1577,39 @@ ir_to_mesa_visitor::visit(ir_assignment *ir) assert(!ir->lhs->type->is_scalar() && !ir->lhs->type->is_vector()); l.writemask = WRITEMASK_XYZW; } else if (ir->lhs->type->is_scalar()) { - /* FINISHME: This hack makes writing to gl_FragData, which lives in the + /* FINISHME: This hack makes writing to gl_FragDepth, which lives in the * FINISHME: W component of fragment shader output zero, work correctly. */ l.writemask = WRITEMASK_XYZW; } else { + int swizzles[4]; + int first_enabled_chan = 0; + int rhs_chan = 0; + assert(ir->lhs->type->is_vector()); l.writemask = ir->write_mask; + + for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) { + if (l.writemask & (1 << i)) { + first_enabled_chan = GET_SWZ(r.swizzle, i); + break; + } + } + + /* Swizzle a small RHS vector into the channels being written. + * + * glsl ir treats write_mask as dictating how many channels are + * present on the RHS while Mesa IR treats write_mask as just + * showing which channels of the vec4 RHS get written. + */ + for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) { + if (l.writemask & (1 << i)) + swizzles[i] = GET_SWZ(r.swizzle, rhs_chan++); + else + swizzles[i] = first_enabled_chan; + } + r.swizzle = MAKE_SWIZZLE4(swizzles[0], swizzles[1], + swizzles[2], swizzles[3]); } assert(l.file != PROGRAM_UNDEFINED); |