ralloc: use rzalloc where it's necessary

No change in behavior. ralloc_size is equivalent to rzalloc_size.
That will change though.

Calls not switched to rzalloc_size:
- ralloc_vasprintf
- glsl_type::name allocation (it's filled with snprintf)
- C++ classes where valgrind didn't show uninitialized values

I switched most of non-glsl stuff to rzalloc without checking whether
it's really needed.

Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Edmondo Tommasina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c
index d79e0ea00c7..9658b48ca13 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_state_batch.c
@@ -46,9 +46,10 @@ brw_track_state_batch(struct brw_context *brw,
    if (!brw->state_batch_list) {
       /* Our structs are always aligned to at least 32 bytes, so
        * our array doesn't need to be any larger
+       * TODO: don't use rzalloc
        */
-      brw->state_batch_list = ralloc_size(brw, sizeof(*brw->state_batch_list) *
-					  batch->bo->size / 32);
+      brw->state_batch_list = rzalloc_size(brw, sizeof(*brw->state_batch_list) *
+                                           batch->bo->size / 32);
    }
 
    brw->state_batch_list[brw->state_batch_count].offset = offset;