summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/mesa/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt Turner <[email protected]>2016-02-15 10:05:33 -0800
committerMatt Turner <[email protected]>2016-03-30 19:54:30 -0700
commit7b208a731277b4b99b86af3df98c1219099036d7 (patch)
treef5b3fc8a4fe65e3e7b36cfba605716cfbd5a6e16 /src/mesa/drivers
parentf60750968c66f7aa15181c4ba315bb594e615044 (diff)
i965: Relax restriction on scheduling last instruction.
I think when this code was written, basic blocks were always ended by a control flow instruction or an end-of-thread message. That's no longer the case, and removing this restriction actually helps things: instructions in affected programs: 7267 -> 7244 (-0.32%) helped: 4 total cycles in shared programs: 66559580 -> 66431900 (-0.19%) cycles in affected programs: 28310152 -> 28182472 (-0.45%) helped: 9577 HURT: 879 GAINED: 2 The addition of the is_control_flow() checks is not a functional change, since the add_insts_from_block() does not put them in the list of instructions to schedule. I plan to change this in a later patch. Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa/drivers')
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp23
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp
index 66eb07e6d1a..46b45a5ea01 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_schedule_instructions.cpp
@@ -923,15 +923,6 @@ fs_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
*/
schedule_node *last_fixed_grf_write = NULL;
- /* The last instruction always needs to still be the last
- * instruction. Either it's flow control (IF, ELSE, ENDIF, DO,
- * WHILE) and scheduling other things after it would disturb the
- * basic block, or it's FB_WRITE and we should do a better job at
- * dead code elimination anyway.
- */
- schedule_node *last = (schedule_node *)instructions.get_tail();
- add_barrier_deps(last);
-
memset(last_grf_write, 0, sizeof(last_grf_write));
memset(last_mrf_write, 0, sizeof(last_mrf_write));
@@ -940,7 +931,8 @@ fs_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
fs_inst *inst = (fs_inst *)n->inst;
if (inst->opcode == FS_OPCODE_PLACEHOLDER_HALT ||
- inst->has_side_effects())
+ inst->is_control_flow() ||
+ inst->has_side_effects())
add_barrier_deps(n);
/* read-after-write deps. */
@@ -1166,15 +1158,6 @@ vec4_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
*/
schedule_node *last_fixed_grf_write = NULL;
- /* The last instruction always needs to still be the last instruction.
- * Either it's flow control (IF, ELSE, ENDIF, DO, WHILE) and scheduling
- * other things after it would disturb the basic block, or it's the EOT
- * URB_WRITE and we should do a better job at dead code eliminating
- * anything that could have been scheduled after it.
- */
- schedule_node *last = (schedule_node *)instructions.get_tail();
- add_barrier_deps(last);
-
memset(last_grf_write, 0, sizeof(last_grf_write));
memset(last_mrf_write, 0, sizeof(last_mrf_write));
@@ -1182,7 +1165,7 @@ vec4_instruction_scheduler::calculate_deps()
foreach_in_list(schedule_node, n, &instructions) {
vec4_instruction *inst = (vec4_instruction *)n->inst;
- if (inst->has_side_effects())
+ if (inst->is_control_flow() || inst->has_side_effects())
add_barrier_deps(n);
/* read-after-write deps. */