diff options
author | Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> | 2015-03-04 18:14:31 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Emil Velikov <[email protected]> | 2015-03-07 17:54:17 +0000 |
commit | 47a3ae1f20a5e936c2f4bed864dd2d9427ed651d (patch) | |
tree | e872933403c5a2697c87e4e7370d314fe23df790 /src/mesa/drivers/dri | |
parent | dbf974636af53d15cd9b0924262a1f29d21dcfb1 (diff) |
i965: Split Gen4-5 BlitFramebuffer code; prefer BLT over Meta.
A while back I switched intel_blit_framebuffer to prefer Meta over the
BLT. This meant that Gen8 platforms would start using the 3D engine
for blits, just like we do on Gen6-7.5.
However, I hadn't considered Gen4-5 when making that change. The BLT
engine appears to be substantially faster on 965GM than using Meta to
drive the 3D engine. This isn't too surprising: original Gen4 doesn't
support tile offsets (that came on G45), and the level/layer fields
don't work for cubemap rendering, so for inconvenient miplevel
alignments, we end up blitting or copying data to/from temporaries
in order to render to it. We may as well just use the blitter.
I chose to use the BLT on Gen4-5 because they use the same ring for
both 3D and BLT; Gen6+ splits it out.
Fixes regressions on 965GM due to botched tile offset code (we should
fix those properly as well, but they're longstanding bugs - for now,
put things back to the status quo).
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89430
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Topi Pohjolainen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Cc: "10.5" <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit aa0705c06c03d2b882ac7b185ed123bc8a10d716)
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mesa/drivers/dri')
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_fbo.c | 50 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_fbo.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_fbo.c index 174cea06cbb..293b68e3699 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_fbo.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_fbo.c @@ -916,6 +916,51 @@ intel_blit_framebuffer(struct gl_context *ctx, } /** + * Gen4-5 implementation of glBlitFrameBuffer(). + * + * Tries BLT, Meta, then swrast. + * + * Gen4-5 have a single ring for both 3D and BLT operations, so there's no + * inter-ring synchronization issues like on Gen6+. It is apparently faster + * than using the 3D pipeline. Original Gen4 also has to rebase and copy + * miptree slices in order to render to unaligned locations. + */ +static void +gen4_blit_framebuffer(struct gl_context *ctx, + struct gl_framebuffer *readFb, + struct gl_framebuffer *drawFb, + GLint srcX0, GLint srcY0, GLint srcX1, GLint srcY1, + GLint dstX0, GLint dstY0, GLint dstX1, GLint dstY1, + GLbitfield mask, GLenum filter) +{ + /* Page 679 of OpenGL 4.4 spec says: + * "Added BlitFramebuffer to commands affected by conditional rendering in + * section 10.10 (Bug 9562)." + */ + if (!_mesa_check_conditional_render(ctx)) + return; + + mask = intel_blit_framebuffer_with_blitter(ctx, readFb, drawFb, + srcX0, srcY0, srcX1, srcY1, + dstX0, dstY0, dstX1, dstY1, + mask, filter); + if (mask == 0x0) + return; + + mask = _mesa_meta_BlitFramebuffer(ctx, readFb, drawFb, + srcX0, srcY0, srcX1, srcY1, + dstX0, dstY0, dstX1, dstY1, + mask, filter); + if (mask == 0x0) + return; + + _swrast_BlitFramebuffer(ctx, readFb, drawFb, + srcX0, srcY0, srcX1, srcY1, + dstX0, dstY0, dstX1, dstY1, + mask, filter); +} + +/** * Does the renderbuffer have hiz enabled? */ bool @@ -1049,7 +1094,10 @@ intel_fbo_init(struct brw_context *brw) dd->UnmapRenderbuffer = intel_unmap_renderbuffer; dd->RenderTexture = intel_render_texture; dd->ValidateFramebuffer = intel_validate_framebuffer; - dd->BlitFramebuffer = intel_blit_framebuffer; + if (brw->gen >= 6) + dd->BlitFramebuffer = intel_blit_framebuffer; + else + dd->BlitFramebuffer = gen4_blit_framebuffer; dd->EGLImageTargetRenderbufferStorage = intel_image_target_renderbuffer_storage; |