summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIago Toral Quiroga <[email protected]>2017-09-20 09:22:51 +0200
committerIago Toral Quiroga <[email protected]>2017-10-02 08:27:13 +0200
commit5e584a9db7f2900a8ed13575098940b79c84d98b (patch)
tree9a72eb54da18358da10a47c6ab7d8b3471376850 /src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
parent3cfd6ad01c857ba89a6d0ce6b658bb0c92819bdf (diff)
i965: skip reading unused slots at the begining of the URB for the FS
We can start reading the URB at the first offset that contains varyings that are actually read in the URB. We still need to make sure that we read at least one varying to honor hardware requirements. This helps alleviate a problem introduced with 99df02ca26f61 for separate shader objects: without separate shader objects we assign locations sequentially, however, since that commit we have changed the method for SSO so that the VUE slot assigned depends on the number of builtin slots plus the location assigned to the varying. This fixed layout is intended to help SSO programs by avoiding on-the-fly recompiles when swapping out shaders, however, it also means that if a varying uses a large location number close to the maximum allowed by the SF/FS units (31), then the offset introduced by the number of builtin slots can push the location outside the range and trigger an assertion. This problem is affecting at least the following CTS tests for enhanced layouts: KHR-GL45.enhanced_layouts.varying_array_components KHR-GL45.enhanced_layouts.varying_array_locations KHR-GL45.enhanced_layouts.varying_components KHR-GL45.enhanced_layouts.varying_locations which use SSO and the the location layout qualifier to select such location numbers explicitly. This change helps these tests because for SSO we always have to include things such as VARYING_SLOT_CLIP_DIST{0,1} even if the fragment shader is very unlikely to read them, so by doing this we free builtin slots from the fixed VUE layout and we avoid the tests to crash in this scenario. Of course, this is not a proper fix, we'd still run into problems if someone tries to use an explicit max location and read gl_ViewportIndex, gl_LayerID or gl_CullDistancein in the FS, but that would be a much less common bug and we can probably wait to see if anyone actually runs into that situation in a real world scenario before making the decision that more aggresive changes are required to support this without reverting 99df02ca26f61. v2: - Add a debug message when we skip clip distances (Ilia) - we also need to account for this when we compute the urb setup for the fragment shader stage, so add a compiler util to compute the first slot that we need to read from the URB instead of replicating the logic in both places. v3: - Make the util more generic so it can account for all unused slots at the beginning of the URB, that will make it more useful (Ken). - Drop the debug message, it was not what Ilia was asking for. Suggested-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp')
-rw-r--r--src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp7
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
index e33cb0e1186..a40b910c1a0 100644
--- a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
+++ b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs.cpp
@@ -1481,9 +1481,6 @@ fs_visitor::calculate_urb_setup()
}
}
} else {
- bool include_vue_header =
- nir->info.inputs_read & (VARYING_BIT_LAYER | VARYING_BIT_VIEWPORT);
-
/* We have enough input varyings that the SF/SBE pipeline stage can't
* arbitrarily rearrange them to suit our whim; we have to put them
* in an order that matches the output of the previous pipeline stage
@@ -1493,8 +1490,10 @@ fs_visitor::calculate_urb_setup()
brw_compute_vue_map(devinfo, &prev_stage_vue_map,
key->input_slots_valid,
nir->info.separate_shader);
+
int first_slot =
- include_vue_header ? 0 : 2 * BRW_SF_URB_ENTRY_READ_OFFSET;
+ brw_compute_first_urb_slot_required(nir->info.inputs_read,
+ &prev_stage_vue_map);
assert(prev_stage_vue_map.num_slots <= first_slot + 32);
for (int slot = first_slot; slot < prev_stage_vue_map.num_slots;