summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/138-multi-line-comment-in-if-0.c.expected
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCarl Worth <[email protected]>2014-06-26 10:56:41 -0700
committerCarl Worth <[email protected]>2014-07-29 15:11:50 -0700
commit12d583b21a7e538d7fa44c3129e95b407d03c01a (patch)
tree4a422c7cf743ee45b50f6c4d165ecbd086133b2b /src/glsl/glcpp/tests/138-multi-line-comment-in-if-0.c.expected
parent346d712e87f09b434706ee21de02860f104c1c3c (diff)
glsl/glcpp: Add test for a multi-line comment within an #if 0 block
This test is written to exercise a bug which I recently wrote, (but fortunately caught and fixed before ever committing it). For the curious: The bug happened when the NEWLINE_CATCHUP code didn't actually return the NEWLINE token (due to the skipping). This resulted in the lexer continuing on through all the subsequent rules while still in the NEWLINE_CATCHUP start condition, (which then triggered the internal-compiler-error catch-all rule). What is intended is for the return of the NEWLINE token to start a new iteration of the lexer loop, at which time the NEWLINE_CATCHUP-handling code will reset from the <NEWLINE_CATCHUP> to the <INITIAL> start condition. Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/glsl/glcpp/tests/138-multi-line-comment-in-if-0.c.expected')
-rw-r--r--src/glsl/glcpp/tests/138-multi-line-comment-in-if-0.c.expected7
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/138-multi-line-comment-in-if-0.c.expected b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/138-multi-line-comment-in-if-0.c.expected
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0d6ef4d9ad4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/138-multi-line-comment-in-if-0.c.expected
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+SUCCESS
+