summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/gallium/auxiliary
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Stellard <[email protected]>2017-05-05 01:07:00 +0000
committerEmil Velikov <[email protected]>2017-05-19 23:14:24 +0100
commite0df523795e406d5ae0cbc78fc8dc64b06ebb20f (patch)
tree8c384479cbdb87e09792b6270189c1ec2e918248 /src/gallium/auxiliary
parent6199b3d485a1b5cd609a458f6b23e0f81c0f1baa (diff)
gallivm: Make sure module has the correct data layout when pass manager runs
The datalayout for modules was purposely not being set in order to work around the fact that the ExecutionEngine requires that the module's datalayout matches the datalayout of the TargetMachine that the ExecutionEngine is using. When the pass manager runs on a module with no datalayout, it uses the default datalayout which is little-endian. This causes problems on big-endian targets, because some optimizations that are legal on little-endian or illegal on big-endian. To resolve this, we set the datalayout prior to running the pass manager, and then clear it before creating the ExectionEngine. This patch fixes a lot of piglit tests on big-endian ppc64. Cc: [email protected] (cherry picked from commit 14e525a4d70649eb10185bebd2aef9dc339fb5e6)
Diffstat (limited to 'src/gallium/auxiliary')
-rw-r--r--src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_init.c34
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_init.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_init.c
index ef2580e8263..9f1ade68c49 100644
--- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_init.c
+++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_init.c
@@ -125,19 +125,6 @@ create_pass_manager(struct gallivm_state *gallivm)
LLVMAddTargetData(gallivm->target, gallivm->passmgr);
#endif
- /* Setting the module's DataLayout to an empty string will cause the
- * ExecutionEngine to copy to the DataLayout string from its target
- * machine to the module. As of LLVM 3.8 the module and the execution
- * engine are required to have the same DataLayout.
- *
- * TODO: This is just a temporary work-around. The correct solution is
- * for gallivm_init_state() to create a TargetMachine and pull the
- * DataLayout from there. Currently, the TargetMachine used by llvmpipe
- * is being implicitly created by the EngineBuilder in
- * lp_build_create_jit_compiler_for_module()
- */
-
-#if HAVE_LLVM < 0x0308
{
char *td_str;
// New ones from the Module.
@@ -145,9 +132,6 @@ create_pass_manager(struct gallivm_state *gallivm)
LLVMSetDataLayout(gallivm->module, td_str);
free(td_str);
}
-#else
- LLVMSetDataLayout(gallivm->module, "");
-#endif
if ((gallivm_debug & GALLIVM_DEBUG_NO_OPT) == 0) {
/* These are the passes currently listed in llvm-c/Transforms/Scalar.h,
@@ -628,6 +612,24 @@ gallivm_compile_module(struct gallivm_state *gallivm)
}
if (use_mcjit) {
+ /* Setting the module's DataLayout to an empty string will cause the
+ * ExecutionEngine to copy to the DataLayout string from its target
+ * machine to the module. As of LLVM 3.8 the module and the execution
+ * engine are required to have the same DataLayout.
+ *
+ * We must make sure we do this after running the optimization passes,
+ * because those passes need a correct datalayout string. For example,
+ * if those optimization passes see an empty datalayout, they will assume
+ * this is a little endian target and will do optimizations that break big
+ * endian machines.
+ *
+ * TODO: This is just a temporary work-around. The correct solution is
+ * for gallivm_init_state() to create a TargetMachine and pull the
+ * DataLayout from there. Currently, the TargetMachine used by llvmpipe
+ * is being implicitly created by the EngineBuilder in
+ * lp_build_create_jit_compiler_for_module()
+ */
+ LLVMSetDataLayout(gallivm->module, "");
assert(!gallivm->engine);
if (!init_gallivm_engine(gallivm)) {
assert(0);