summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/compiler/nir
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2019-06-20 16:13:39 -0500
committerJuan A. Suarez Romero <[email protected]>2019-07-15 10:00:59 +0000
commitf5e70045e1ad7ff6c2cdd9a8eff682fcdd166067 (patch)
treefa18e5eaf0e645d7c2832cac25164f97e0dd7a8b /src/compiler/nir
parentd76ab7d9fb8898e5b1582d8b5dca14191787ae81 (diff)
nir/loop_analyze: Fix phi-of-identical-alu detection
One issue was that the original version didn't check that swizzles matched when comparing ALU instructions so it could end up matching very different instructions. Using the nir_instrs_equal function from nir_instr_set.c which we use for CSE should be much more reliable. Another was that the loop assumes it will only run two iterations which may not be true. If there's something which guarantees that this case only happens for phis after ifs, it wasn't documented. Fixes: 9e6b39e1d521 "nir: detect more induction variables" Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 9f7ffe41dd185487479ea8846df1f5cdbf1b83a6)
Diffstat (limited to 'src/compiler/nir')
-rw-r--r--src/compiler/nir/nir_loop_analyze.c55
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_loop_analyze.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_loop_analyze.c
index 0ae9533e007..20905be25f9 100644
--- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_loop_analyze.c
+++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_loop_analyze.c
@@ -274,6 +274,31 @@ compute_invariance_information(loop_info_state *state)
}
}
+/* If all of the instruction sources point to identical ALU instructions (as
+ * per nir_instrs_equal), return one of the ALU instructions. Otherwise,
+ * return NULL.
+ */
+static nir_alu_instr *
+phi_instr_as_alu(nir_phi_instr *phi)
+{
+ nir_alu_instr *first = NULL;
+ nir_foreach_phi_src(src, phi) {
+ assert(src->src.is_ssa);
+ if (src->src.ssa->parent_instr->type != nir_instr_type_alu)
+ return NULL;
+
+ nir_alu_instr *alu = nir_instr_as_alu(src->src.ssa->parent_instr);
+ if (first == NULL) {
+ first = alu;
+ } else {
+ if (!nir_instrs_equal(&first->instr, &alu->instr))
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return first;
+}
+
static bool
compute_induction_information(loop_info_state *state)
{
@@ -313,33 +338,11 @@ compute_induction_information(loop_info_state *state)
if (is_var_phi(src_var)) {
nir_phi_instr *src_phi =
nir_instr_as_phi(src_var->def->parent_instr);
-
- nir_op alu_op = nir_num_opcodes; /* avoid uninitialized warning */
- nir_ssa_def *alu_srcs[2] = {0};
- nir_foreach_phi_src(src2, src_phi) {
- nir_loop_variable *src_var2 =
- get_loop_var(src2->src.ssa, state);
-
- if (!src_var2->in_if_branch || !is_var_alu(src_var2))
+ nir_alu_instr *src_phi_alu = phi_instr_as_alu(src_phi);
+ if (src_phi_alu) {
+ src_var = get_loop_var(&src_phi_alu->dest.dest.ssa, state);
+ if (!src_var->in_if_branch)
break;
-
- nir_alu_instr *alu =
- nir_instr_as_alu(src_var2->def->parent_instr);
- if (nir_op_infos[alu->op].num_inputs != 2)
- break;
-
- if (alu->src[0].src.ssa == alu_srcs[0] &&
- alu->src[1].src.ssa == alu_srcs[1] &&
- alu->op == alu_op) {
- /* Both branches perform the same calculation so we can use
- * one of them to find the induction variable.
- */
- src_var = src_var2;
- } else {
- alu_srcs[0] = alu->src[0].src.ssa;
- alu_srcs[1] = alu->src[1].src.ssa;
- alu_op = alu->op;
- }
}
}